Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

It was mcneese but the offensive line was fantastic last night

Posted on 10/4/26 at 10:54 am
Posted by Cd104
Member since Aug 2018
2522 posts
Posted on 10/4/26 at 10:54 am
They have played strong ball since the ole Miss game. In both pass blocking and run blocking they handled their business. Weston Davis deserves some love he’s been playing the best ball of his career.


This kid was. Former 5 star so if the light is truly turning on that is massive esp since we have the best pass blocker LT in the country on the other side in Seaton. Moore has been stable, bah has been solid. The only real question mark on the line is LG but outside of that this unit looks strong.
This post was edited on 10/4/26 at 11:00 am
Posted by Tigerpride18
Lubbock TX
Member since Sep 2017
33640 posts
Posted on 10/4/26 at 10:57 am to
"but it was mcneese" means more than yall are giving it credit for. that team was so bad that you literally cant take a single thing away from that game that a starter did. maybe the backups and 3rd string can be evaluated . all you have to do is look at how wide open our receivers were and that will tell you that you cant take anything from that game.

negative things are magnified though...not worried about Watkins. those drops will just make him put in more work
This post was edited on 10/4/26 at 10:58 am
Posted by Cd104
Member since Aug 2018
2522 posts
Posted on 10/4/26 at 10:58 am to
quote:

but it was mcneese" means more than yall are giving it credit for. that team was so bad that you literally cant take a single thing away from that game that a starter did. maybe the backups and 3rd string can be evaluated . all you have to do is look at how wife open our receivers were and that will tell you that you cant take anything from that game


For sure agree with you which is why I said since the ole Miss game lol. The o line as a whole is stacking good performances. They will get a test this week vs a good Kentucky front
This post was edited on 10/4/26 at 11:00 am
Posted by Maximus
Member since Feb 2004
81681 posts
Posted on 10/4/26 at 10:59 am to
Bordelons still playing 60% of the time at LG and your only concern is RG.
Posted by dstone12
Texan
Member since Jan 2007
42209 posts
Posted on 10/4/26 at 10:59 am to
quote:

"but it was mcneese" means more than yall are giving it credit for. that team was so bad that you literally cant take a single thing away from that game that a starter did. maybe the backups and 3rd string can be evaluated . all you have to do is look at how wide open our receivers were and that will tell you that you cant take anything from that game. negative things are magnified though...not worried about Watkins. those drops will just make him put in more work


This.

Rant would be on fire if we weren’t near perfect.
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
292189 posts
Posted on 10/4/26 at 11:00 am to
the OL slobfest is premature AF
Posted by Cd104
Member since Aug 2018
2522 posts
Posted on 10/4/26 at 11:00 am to
quote:

Bordelons still playing 60% of the time at LG and your only concern is RG.


Brainfart on my end meant LG. Borderlon is by far the biggest liability on the offensive line esp in pass protection. He’s a solid run blocker tho that’s prob why he still plays
Posted by Cd104
Member since Aug 2018
2522 posts
Posted on 10/4/26 at 11:01 am to
quote:

the OL slobfest is premature AF


We’ll learn a lot more about them Saturday at Kentucky. I’ve jus liked the way they’ve responded since ole Miss punched them in the mouth
Posted by Jest a game
Member since Aug 2024
2916 posts
Posted on 10/4/26 at 11:09 am to
Blowing them out
Posted by burke985
UGANDA
Member since Aug 2011
29526 posts
Posted on 10/4/26 at 11:12 am to
They played well during the Texas A&M game too, got to build continuity don't matter who you playing
Posted by Cito2point0
Member since Aug 2024
244 posts
Posted on 10/4/26 at 11:14 am to
O-line played well last weekend too. Certainly improved from week 1.
Posted by Paul Allen
Montauk, NY
Member since Nov 2007
79052 posts
Posted on 10/4/26 at 11:24 am to
I really think the top 5 high school teams in the nation could have beaten McNeese last night.
Posted by Barbellthor
Columbia
Member since Aug 2015
11882 posts
Posted on 10/4/26 at 11:39 am to
quote:

"but it was mcneese" means more than yall are giving it credit for.

Not untrue. But you're supposed to beat teams you're supposed to beat in the way you're supposed to. We didn't do that to Tech (which ain't a bad team, but still), but did here. Looking meh like we used to would have means more than looking good.

It's something like, "We don't know if we're even though we looked good because of the opponent, but we know we are bad because we looked sloppy." But we didn't look sloppy. So that's new, and I like that.
Posted by Meauxjeaux
102836 posts including my alters
Member since Jun 2005
47795 posts
Posted on 10/4/26 at 12:42 pm to
All I know is for a long time there,
Ryan Mirets’ snaps were way better than Braelin Moore’s snaps.
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
58170 posts
Posted on 10/4/26 at 12:42 pm to
We are extremely weak at LG. Number 50 is about the same as #67.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•X•Instagram