- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Is this bad enough HOLDING for it to be called? Did this non call impact the game?
Posted on 10/14/19 at 12:41 pm
Posted on 10/14/19 at 12:41 pm
SEC
>
>
This post was edited on 10/14/19 at 1:46 pm
Posted on 10/14/19 at 12:44 pm to bayoubengals88
His head didn't come off, so nothing to see here. Move along.
Posted on 10/14/19 at 12:45 pm to liquid rabbit
Yes that was the worse non-call of the night. Second was calling Brooks for hiting low when he planted his helment in the guy's arse.
Posted on 10/14/19 at 12:46 pm to bayoubengals88
It blows my mind when it is a guy almost chasing down the ball carrier
WHERE ELSE ARE YOU LOOKING?
WHERE ELSE ARE YOU LOOKING?
Posted on 10/14/19 at 12:46 pm to bayoubengals88
The one with Trask in the end zone was just as obvious and bad.
Should have been a safety.
You just have to realize that the game is played now less on the field and in the court of opinion and judgement, and can be controlled and manipulated to their discretion.
The entire validity of what you are witnessing is in question, so fully investing in following it is at your own peril.
Should have been a safety.
You just have to realize that the game is played now less on the field and in the court of opinion and judgement, and can be controlled and manipulated to their discretion.
The entire validity of what you are witnessing is in question, so fully investing in following it is at your own peril.
Posted on 10/14/19 at 12:47 pm to liquid rabbit
despite that non call, there's no reason they should have scored there, and we should have had the ball. That play's outcome was still in our hands, and we lost it.
Our luck is going to change defensively. We probably have as many dropped interceptions as we do passes on offense. We're too talented to keep doing that.
Patrick Queen played an awesome game though.
Our luck is going to change defensively. We probably have as many dropped interceptions as we do passes on offense. We're too talented to keep doing that.
Patrick Queen played an awesome game though.
Posted on 10/14/19 at 12:47 pm to FreddieMac
quote:
Second was calling Brooks for hiting low when he planted his helment in the guy's arse.
Third was the holding in the endzone when we had them backed up, which immediately preceded the intentional grounding, IMO
Posted on 10/14/19 at 12:48 pm to wahoocs
A hold yes ....but obviously there was no one around that had a clear view of what was going on to make that call with any confidence.
Posted on 10/14/19 at 12:50 pm to bayoubengals88
Jacoby Stevens busted that coverage, he was lost and should’ve been on one of the receivers
Posted on 10/14/19 at 12:52 pm to bayoubengals88
Holding can be called on every play.
In this one the DT got a hand on the QB and affected the throw...which hit the LSU LB in the goddamn hands. Could holding have been called? Probably, as it could on many, many plays on both sides. But LSU couldn't have gotten a better outcome (4th and goal pass that hits a defender in the hands) if the defender actually makes the play right in front of him.
In this one the DT got a hand on the QB and affected the throw...which hit the LSU LB in the goddamn hands. Could holding have been called? Probably, as it could on many, many plays on both sides. But LSU couldn't have gotten a better outcome (4th and goal pass that hits a defender in the hands) if the defender actually makes the play right in front of him.
Posted on 10/14/19 at 12:54 pm to TeddyPadillac
quote:
despite that non call, there's no reason they should have scored there, and we should have had the ball. That play's outcome was still in our hands, and we lost it.
What? If he doesn't get blatantly held, he has a sack. Or alternatively, they call the hold and the touchdown is waved off.
Posted on 10/14/19 at 12:54 pm to Alt26
quote:
Holding can be called on every play.
Every holding where the play is made as a result of the holding should be called.
Posted on 10/14/19 at 12:54 pm to bayoubengals88
If Stevens stays with his man maybe the ball never gets thrown.
Posted on 10/14/19 at 12:54 pm to ValleyofDeath
Patrick Queen did a good job under the circumstances. Defending two players he was still in a position to make a play....which he ultimately didn't make but still.
Posted on 10/14/19 at 12:55 pm to bayoubengals88
They're practicing these no calls for the Alabama game.
Posted on 10/14/19 at 12:56 pm to bayoubengals88
...but theres "holding on every play" or that's what they said on TV.
shite was pathetic Saturday
shite was pathetic Saturday
Posted on 10/14/19 at 12:58 pm to bayoubengals88
someone PLEASE photoshop a blind-man cane into the hands of that ref to the right.
Posted on 10/14/19 at 1:02 pm to fblainen11
Do you not see the center judge standing in view four yards behind the Qb
Posted on 10/14/19 at 1:05 pm to wahoocs
quote:I went back and looked at that one because I thought it was really bad. After re-watching it, I don't think it was holding.
The one with Trask in the end zone was just as obvious and bad.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News