- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Is there any reason not to roster them
Posted on 9/3/26 at 9:18 pm to RBTiger
Posted on 9/3/26 at 9:18 pm to RBTiger
Word is the federal judge is likely to essentially reverse the ruling today, which he can do.
I think it’s possible…very seriously…that the SEC member institutions vote to remove LSU after the academic school year.
That’s a real possibility now
I think it’s possible…very seriously…that the SEC member institutions vote to remove LSU after the academic school year.
That’s a real possibility now
3
Posted on 9/3/26 at 9:20 pm to RBTiger
They can say they were operating under the TRO prior to new adjusted rules. Honestly, if alabama can play a guy who played in the G-league for 3 years then we should put them on the roster and play them.
Ask Sankey why he didn’t sue Nate Oaks or Alabama etc.
Ask Sankey why he didn’t sue Nate Oaks or Alabama etc.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 9:21 pm to GeorgeWest
quote:
Should the CFP Committee choose to NOT rank LSU, a 10-2 LSU could easily be left out of the cfp. I am not predicting that, but it is a possibility.
I want LSU to 12-0 and just beat the dogshit out of every SEC team on the schedule.
Then let them leave us out of the playoff and prove (again) how much a sham this all is.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 9:21 pm to trussthetruzz
quote:
Could the college football playoff leave us out?
Not if we win the conference
Posted on 9/3/26 at 9:21 pm to WONTONGO
quote:
Sankey said, ok, you want to sue me personally, let's do
What???
Who has sued Sankey personally?
Posted on 9/3/26 at 9:22 pm to DeltaDoc
Where is this word from?
The federal lawsuit is against LSU, Kiffin, Verge, and Rousse. Their argument is a infringement of their first amendment rights.
The federal lawsuit is against LSU, Kiffin, Verge, and Rousse. Their argument is a infringement of their first amendment rights.
This post was edited on 9/3/26 at 9:24 pm
Posted on 9/3/26 at 9:24 pm to Buga
quote:
I just read where LSU by law has to roster them.
No law can make a school accept a player. That makes no sense what so ever.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 9:24 pm to TT
Besides the Sankey 15 voting us out of the conference… not really. LSU is added to the lawsuit now. So could get hit with contempt and sanctions if we don’t… at least Wright I would guess. Our hands are tied Sankey.
This post was edited on 9/3/26 at 9:28 pm
Posted on 9/3/26 at 9:24 pm to Buga
quote:
I just read where LSU by law has to roster them.
It says they can’t decide not to roster them based on SEC/Ncaa penalties or retribution
If we say they’re not good enough then that’s fine
Posted on 9/3/26 at 9:25 pm to Raging Tiger
Seen this on other boards and heard a couple of national outlets mention the federal court likelihood throughout the day.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 9:26 pm to TT
If we roster but don’t play them and the SEC wins in federal, can the SEC then void our wins and penalize us?
Posted on 9/3/26 at 9:28 pm to DeltaDoc
quote:I don’t think so.
Word is the federal judge is likely to essentially reverse the ruling today, which he can do.
quote:There is absolutely zero chance of that happening.
I think it’s possible…very seriously…that the SEC member institutions vote to remove LSU after the academic school year.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 9:35 pm to TT
if you roster them but do not play them does that provide cover until the federal lawsuit can be addressed?
If AG is correct the fed lawsuit will get tossed quickly
If AG is correct the fed lawsuit will get tossed quickly
Posted on 9/3/26 at 9:35 pm to TT
quote:
What’s the risk?
An appeals court overruling this decision, allowing the SEC to punish LSU retroactively.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 9:36 pm to rltiger
I seriously wonder about anyone who believes LSU could be expelled from the league.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 9:37 pm to TT
No reason not to. We are going to do it.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 9:44 pm to Indefatigable
Sometimes you have to wonder if being "right" is worth the squeeze. I'm not sure I am comfortable with the risk of having wins stripped due to playing players found ineligible due to the final disposition of the case - assuming the worst case outcome.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 9:45 pm to TutHillTiger
College football teams must submit a 105-player roster to the College Athlete Payment System 24 hours before their first game, but limited exceptions allow replacements for injuries, suspensions, withdrawals, and designated student-athletes who do not count against the cap.Key points:All FBS teams must file their rosters with CAPS no later than 24 hours before their season opener.CAPS operates under the oversight of the College Sports Commission.A submitted roster of 105 players remains fixed for the season unless specific exceptions apply.Teams can add players up to the 105-player limit if they did not initially submit a full roster.Injured or ill players, permanently suspended players, and students who fully withdraw from the institution can be replaced on the roster.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 5:52 am to Mobiletiger
quote:
Question is does Lane try to continue the pursuit or just say we proved our point and these two guys are not going to make or break this team.
Blatantly use players for a poltical agenda then abandon them? He would never convince another kid he is trustworthy and with their best interest at heart. That would be absolute image suicide. Hell his supporters would turn on him for such scummy behavior
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News