- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Is OC Tony Peterson at Louisiana Tech good enough for LSU?
Posted on 12/27/15 at 11:22 pm to tFearIsReal
Posted on 12/27/15 at 11:22 pm to tFearIsReal
LOL.
Driskel was a basketcase under Muschamp.
Driskel was a basketcase under Muschamp.
Posted on 12/27/15 at 11:27 pm to BigCat69
quote:
long as LM maintains that Attitude, and doesn't bring the LSU offensive playbook into the 21st century, he will gradually lose one more game each year than the previous year, and will finally be fired as LSU's coach, and instead of going out with a legacy of success, he will be fired and despised at what he has done with his stubborness in the last years of his contract.
He has a better record than last season. He didn't get fired.
Posted on 12/28/15 at 12:21 am to LSUAlum2001
Wouldn't matter. Les doesn't let any coor. fully install everything they want to do. I've never seen any of our OC's show the offensive schemes they're known for while coaching under Les. Remember Gary Crowton? You should of seen the offenses he ran at Tech and BYU. He gets to LSU, and the offense looks nothing like the ones he coached everywhere else. Same with Cam. So no, Tony Peterson couldn't come in and make a difference under Les.
Posted on 12/28/15 at 1:49 am to LSUAlum2001
No way you can convince some people of that.
It's an urban legend. Les calls all plays...... Period.
It's an urban legend. Les calls all plays...... Period.
Posted on 12/28/15 at 1:54 am to LSUAlum2001
quote:
Hire TP and pay him $400k. He's making $200K at La Tech; you'll be able to give raises to the other coaches who deserve it.
More like give him 700k, but that's still less than half of what they pay Cam this year for this shitastic offense and at least 300k less than any year Cam has been here. We are paying Cam out the arse on name recognition alone. His money was already set like that back when we first brought him on.
Our offense this year has been, 1. run LF, 2. throw deep. Guice has got some yardage in the second half of games as well as Williams, but the offense has pretty much been the LF show.
Look at Oklahoma who took a young 30 something OC from East Carolina, a walk on QB, who is really damn good but was a walk nontheless, and completely turned their offense around. They went from being the Perine show with awful passing last year, to one of the most balanced and potent offenses this year. They lost nothing in the run game, and actually improved dramatically. Same on defense. The defense is actually much better than last year and is one of the best defenses in all of college ball when you factor in the offenses they play.
Posted on 12/28/15 at 1:55 am to evangelfan
quote:
Tony Peterson couldn't come in and make a difference under Les.
He could come in and make a difference on what matters most, and that is QB coaching.
Posted on 12/28/15 at 7:23 am to LSUAlum2001
Yes - CC's offense is too complicated for our QBs.
Posted on 12/28/15 at 7:49 am to Datbayoubengal
Lol. You were wrong then and you are wrong now. Its hilarious all you kids and underdeveloped adults have all the answers. Sure, let's completely change our identity...we won't play power football and won't be able to effectively run the spread for a few years....secretly, this is the ploy to finally get LSU below .500. LSU doesn't need mass changes. They need a qb that can execute this offense...and some changes on route selection and to mix it up more and be less predictable. LSU COULD have a great offense with this philosophy with minor changes and a competent qb. But, I really we have the Xbox generation out there.
Posted on 12/28/15 at 8:56 am to LSUAlum2001
quote:
if Les called the plays, and he said no. However, he did say he had major input into the offensive game plans every week
its pretty effin simple to see that he gives a list of plays that are "approved", he does NOT and I repeat NOT keep his hands out of the cookie jar
Posted on 12/28/15 at 8:58 am to Tigerinthehollow
quote:
Its hilarious all you kids and underdeveloped adults have all the answers
its hilarious that you had to put this in your post, shows that you are threatened by the younger generation
Posted on 12/28/15 at 9:05 am to Ignignot
How? Give me one good reason how I'm threatened by the younger generation. That generation has completely changed some beliefs from my generation. I always believed under promise, over deliver. They believe over promise, under deliver. Which philosophy you think wins in the end?
Posted on 12/28/15 at 9:36 am to LSUAlum2001
quote:
Is OC Tony Peterson at Louisiana Tech good enough for LSU?
Maybe a better question is how would Driskel have done with this same LSU offense? If we had a QB that could make the throws, would a change be necessary. Would it be more like Mett's last year?
Posted on 12/28/15 at 9:41 am to LSUAlum2001
I posted few days ago that watching la tech play offense vs LSU was embarrassing and an eye opener.
This dumbfrick named 5alive got butt hurt about it.
La tech is fun to watch on offense and they prob avg 40 a game.
Let that sink in and then You decide.
This dumbfrick named 5alive got butt hurt about it.
La tech is fun to watch on offense and they prob avg 40 a game.
Let that sink in and then You decide.
Posted on 12/28/15 at 9:50 am to LSUAlum2001
quote:
I asked a former player, who played under Les, if Les called the plays, and he said no. However, he did say he had major input into the offensive game plans every week.
this is the way it should be!
Posted on 12/28/15 at 10:23 am to Makinbacon
Let what sink in? That they scored less than 20 points a ccouple times down the stretch and that southern miss beat the shite out of them? Yes I agree that's embarrassing. What how LSU plays offense tomorrow night you stupid arse. The opponent does matter.
Posted on 12/28/15 at 10:27 am to LSUAlum2001
He is absolutely good enough, the question surrounds how willing is Les to adapt the offense. The NFL game is moving to a hybrid offense where you are under center and also spread out, he needs to get that figured out.
We don't need to move to wide open spread offense, however, we need to make sure it is in the arsenal.
We don't need to move to wide open spread offense, however, we need to make sure it is in the arsenal.
Posted on 12/28/15 at 10:27 am to Tigerinthehollow
quote:
What how LSU plays offense tommorrow night you stupid arse
Ok, I will.
Let's revisit it this after the game and see who the stupid frick here is.
Posted on 12/28/15 at 10:33 am to Tigerinthehollow
quote:
What how LSU plays offense tomorrow night you stupid arse. The opponent does matter.
well yeah...TT defense is perfect for LSU's offense
this game should be Les's wet dream
Posted on 12/28/15 at 10:37 am to Salmon
1900 passing
2300 rushing
40 tds
Vs
4200 passing
1300 rushing
55 tds
That's the difference in offensive production of the two teams.
2300 rushing
40 tds
Vs
4200 passing
1300 rushing
55 tds
That's the difference in offensive production of the two teams.
Posted on 12/28/15 at 10:38 am to LSUAlum2001
quote:
I asked a former player, who played under Les, if Les called the plays, and he said no. However, he did say he had major input into the offensive game plans every week
And he is correct. I think our passing plays suck, the timing of plays called during games suck. Les has to make a change ASAP.
Popular
Back to top


0






