- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Is it fair to say this is overall the best coached LSU team since the Saban era?
Posted on 11/11/19 at 9:30 pm to Lester Earl
Posted on 11/11/19 at 9:30 pm to Lester Earl
Melting
Yes, that's exactly what I'm doing.
Yes, that's exactly what I'm doing.
Posted on 11/11/19 at 9:30 pm to Fat Bastard
quote:
he was forced to keep jimbo for continuity
Ahh. Thanks. I was still in serious party mode in those days and don't recall that. Thanks for correcting.
Posted on 11/11/19 at 9:31 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
Then you're an idiot who thinks the W/L column is all you need to be informed.
most miles pumpers were like that man.
they gave zero fricks about or even knew what PERFORMANCE MEANT or process.
Posted on 11/11/19 at 9:31 pm to TigerLunatik
quote:
But, the question isn't about who is the better coach overall. It's about who did a better job in a given year. It's two seperate things.
That’s what I don’t understand why rob keeps freaking out. It’s about individual years and not the coach overall.
Posted on 11/11/19 at 9:31 pm to TigerLunatik
quote:
Ahh. Thanks. I was still in serious party mode in those days and don't recall that. Thanks for correcting.
Posted on 11/11/19 at 9:32 pm to TigerLunatik
quote:The fact you think the entire metric of this question is to count losses is where you get stupid.
But, the question isn't about who is the better coach overall. It's about who did a better job in a given year. It's two seperate things.
Trust me. Even when Belichick was having losing records at Cleveland, he was one of the best coaches in the NFL.
Posted on 11/11/19 at 9:32 pm to BeeFense5
quote:You think if a coach has 4 losses that means he's a worse coach that year than anyone with less than 4.
That’s what I don’t understand why rob keeps freaking out. It’s about individual years and not the coach overall.
This makes you an idiot.
Posted on 11/11/19 at 9:33 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
The fact you think the entire metric of this question is to count losses is where you get stupid.
Ok. Then tell us why Saban’s 2004 at LSU was better than miles 2005? This should be an electric factory of a response.
Posted on 11/11/19 at 9:33 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
Even when Belichick was having losing records at Cleveland, he was one of the best coaches in the NFL.
Of course he was. That still doesn't mean he was doing the best job of everyone in the league every year.
Posted on 11/11/19 at 9:33 pm to ShortyRob
Using your logic O was a good head coach at Ole Miss. Not sure that works out.
Posted on 11/11/19 at 9:33 pm to ShortyRob
Go on. Tell us why he was better than miles 2005 
Posted on 11/11/19 at 9:35 pm to TigerLunatik
quote:Of course it could mean that.
Of course he was. That still doesn't mean he was doing the best job of everyone in the league every year.
If Saban said frick it, and took the job at Vandy next year, do you think the final result would mean he was the 10th to 14th best coach in the SEC?
Posted on 11/11/19 at 9:35 pm to Fat Bastard
quote:
' first 3 years had a great staff. jimbo, pellini then crowton
Les hired Ed, Ensminger, Aranda and Raymond. We've had good coaches before.
It's hard to say because the offense definitely is, but that 2011 defense is still the best. Actually that stretch of 2010-2012 was pretty damn stout.
St I'd say not the best, but others might have a different opinion. I know coaching doesn't really go into a kicker fricking up.
Posted on 11/11/19 at 9:35 pm to BeeFense5
I must say I absolutely detested that 2004 club. It was painful to watch. It really was.
Posted on 11/11/19 at 9:36 pm to BeeFense5
quote:Because he's a better coach.
Go on. Tell us why he was better than miles 2005
It's really that simple.
That you don't understand this is a you problem.
Posted on 11/11/19 at 9:36 pm to ShortyRob
Saban has established what he is at this point. Not really an equal comparison
Posted on 11/11/19 at 9:36 pm to jgriffith
quote:
I must say I absolutely detested that 2004 club. It was painful to watch. It really was.
Rob thinks that squad was a better coached team than any team miles had
This post was edited on 11/11/19 at 9:38 pm
Posted on 11/11/19 at 9:37 pm to ShortyRob
Jesus man. We are talking about individual teams. How do you not understand this?
Posted on 11/11/19 at 9:37 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:Yeah. Because coaching 11 years apart with no HCing in between is totally the same...…..
Using your logic O was a good head coach at Ole Miss. Not sure that works out.
Popular
Back to top


0





