Started By
Message

Is CFB committee signaling 9-3 might be in?

Posted on 9/24/26 at 12:27 pm
Posted by Yaboylsu63
Member since Mar 2014
3758 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 12:27 pm
I still believe we can go 10-2.. so this is not a doomer post. Kiffin is great and will improve the team.

But in the case we do go 9-3, tons of people will ask if there’s scenarios where we are in.

Well it seems the committee is slightly giving credence to that with the new 9 game SEC schedule.

Posted by FireGoodell
Member since Mar 2019
9099 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 12:30 pm to
Yes, I just saw this.

9-3 with our losses being close losses can definitely get us in if this is their new metric.

Lets ride baws

Posted by FortWorthLSU
Fort Worth, TX
Member since Dec 2020
50 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 12:30 pm to
What does this mean for Notre Dame?
Posted by Hold That Tiger 10
Member since Oct 2013
25994 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 12:30 pm to
Under the right circumstances I believe a 9-3 SEC team can get in, especially if the trend we are seeing now where S. Carolina and Arkansas appear to be the only really bad teams in the conference.

A lot of posters on here will not be able to comprehend a 9-3 team getting in, because it hasn't happened before. They will not be able to comprehend the 9 game conference schedule.
Posted by horsesandbulls
Destin, FL
Member since Jun 2008
5246 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 12:30 pm to
Seems like strength of record with more steps.
Posted by Tigers Win Again
Member since Sep 2026
38 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 12:32 pm to
I am quite sure Notre Dame has a built in clause that lets them in even if they lose to Little Sisters of the Poor.
Posted by Yaboylsu63
Member since Mar 2014
3758 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 12:32 pm to
Posted by evantiger123
stanford montana
Member since Mar 2021
87 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 12:33 pm to
I don't care what they do or what they look at for strength of schedule. What needs to stop is these bids of people like Tulane and James Madison getting in there last year which made for absolutely nonsensical games not even competitive. Thank God I was working and didn't have to watch that s*** that's what needs to happen and I have no problem with Notre Dame as long as they're in the top 12 making it in that's fine with me cuz I know they're a quality team but I'm sorry too. Lane grainy weenies and James Madison. Whatever you are. Y'all had no business being in the playoffs last year. Just taking up space. That's what needs to change
Posted by Tigers Win Again
Member since Sep 2026
38 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 12:33 pm to
Alabama got in with a 9-3 record last year then beat Oklahoma in the 1st round.
Posted by Yaboylsu63
Member since Mar 2014
3758 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 12:36 pm to
That’s inaccurate.
They were 10-2 heading into the SEC champ and lost that game.
Posted by Tigers Win Again
Member since Sep 2026
38 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 12:36 pm to
I believe 9-3 gets us in with our schedule, but that might be testing the limit. How good will Miss State be down the stretch? Same thing with Auburn?

I believe 10-2 is our most realistic landing spot, but 9-3 might do it as well. Heck, now that the Ole Miss game isn't looming, 11-1 could happen-that one depending on the TE utilization until Green returns.
Posted by Tigers Win Again
Member since Sep 2026
38 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 12:37 pm to
You're right, I stand corrected. Thank you.
Posted by Hold That Tiger 10
Member since Oct 2013
25994 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 12:38 pm to
quote:

Alabama got in with a 9-3 record last year


Incorrect
Posted by Diesel88
Idaho
Member since Oct 2018
956 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 12:40 pm to
quote:

especially if the trend we are seeing now where S. Carolina and Arkansas appear to be the only really bad teams in the conference.


Vandy needed a miracle to beat a bad NC State team, and beat Austin Peay and Delawarew by 19 and 9 at home, respectively. South Caroline would beat Vanderbilt by 30. Including them in the same breath as Arkansas is assinine.
Posted by nicholastiger
Member since Jan 2004
57884 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 12:40 pm to
I still say tiers are needed
You could have a separate playoff for non power conferences

eventually I'm not even sure having conferences anymore is the way to go
Posted by Alt26
Member since Mar 2010
36549 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 12:40 pm to
quote:

That’s inaccurate.
They were 10-2 heading into the SEC champ and lost that game.


This.

The committee just chose not to penalize them for losing the SECCG. The only 9-3 (regular season) team to get in is Clemson. But that was an auto-bid by winning the ACCCG

I think what the committee is basically saying without expressly saying it is that there will be no more JMU's getting in simply because they went 12-1 against a weak schedule
Posted by Bestbank Tiger
Premium Member
Member since Jan 2005
83112 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 12:41 pm to
If the 9-3 team is the gumps or Notre Dame they're in for sure.
Posted by paulb52
Member since Dec 2019
9432 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 12:42 pm to
Of course it depends a lot on how other teams in the running have faired. Hence, 9-3 could sneak in. Any team with four losses has no business being in the playoffs. Especially Notre Dame, with their schedule.
Posted by JimTiger72
LA
Member since Jun 2023
20423 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 12:45 pm to
That is why Kiffin was saying 9 game SEC schedule was dumb
Posted by Ironhead985
Member since Jun 2013
10383 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 12:52 pm to
quote:

They were 10-2 heading into the SEC champ and lost that game
Was that game against another tournament team even close? Was it even a game?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•X•Instagram