Started By
Message

re: If we lose the UNC game....

Posted on 6/10/10 at 10:50 am to
Posted by mtnhighTiger
Scottsdale, AZ
Member since Jan 2010
3943 posts
Posted on 6/10/10 at 10:50 am to
quote:

sure could use another nelson stokley


Zach Lee
Posted by jrich11
baton rouge
Member since Jan 2010
993 posts
Posted on 6/10/10 at 10:55 am to
quote:

Anyone thinking this is an easy LSU win knows absolutely nothing about football and is embarrassing themselves posting on the board.


well, obviously you don't know anything about football.

1. you don't have a legit defense with only 3 good players. a good oc will take care of that (and before you tell me about how bad gary is, look what he's done in his 3 bowls here.

2. i was very worried about washington. you don't upset people with a great defense, you upset teams with a great offense. if you can't score you wont win, that was the problem with washington, their qb was very good and underrated.

3. now the only way to lose is to beat ourselves. or if the conditions are terrible, like the penn st game last year. well, jj dont throw pics, takes sacks, but dont throw pics, to a fault almost. and it's in a dome, so no weather.

i'm more worried about miss st. much more worried about miss st.
Posted by ironsides
Nashville, TN
Member since May 2006
8153 posts
Posted on 6/10/10 at 10:57 am to
quote:




People claimed the same crap before the Washington game, LSU should win by 30...easily....and if not, the season is over.

UNC has a very legit defense, and it's offense is no worse than LSU's. The defense may be more talented than the Tigers. UNC has had some decent skill position players since Butch got there on offense.

Anyone thinking this is an easy LSU win knows absolutely nothing about football and is embarrassing themselves posting on the board.


Meh, the only schools they beat by more than 2 touchdowns were Citadel, GA Southern, and Boston College. Only one of those teams is even in Division 1.

They had a weak arse schedule against weak arse competition. We are going to smack them in the mouth and kiss their mommas.
Posted by Choctaw
Pumpin' Sunshine
Member since Jul 2007
77774 posts
Posted on 6/10/10 at 11:08 am to
quote:

and it's offense is no worse than LSU's


don't let the rankings fool you....their offense is WAAAYYY worse than LSU's.

im not saying its going to be an easy win, but it won't be because of their offense.
This post was edited on 6/10/10 at 11:09 am
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
261256 posts
Posted on 6/10/10 at 11:29 am to
quote:


don't let the rankings fool you....their offense is WAAAYYY worse than LSU's.


Not really. There offense is no worse than LSU's. You just have the P&G shade to taint your view. You may want to go back and review LSU's offensive play during the last season. LSU just has more potential but is hampered by a shitty game plan and poor offensive coaching. I would argue that their defense is better as well.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
261256 posts
Posted on 6/10/10 at 11:34 am to

quote:


well, obviously you don't know anything about football.



I certainly predicted a close game against UDub last year unlike 90% of the fanbase. Have predicted the last 4 BCS NCG participants and nailed the final record for last season before LSU played one game.


quote:


1. you don't have a legit defense with only 3 good players. a good oc will take care of that (and before you tell me about how bad gary is, look what he's done in his 3 bowls here.



UNC has 4 projected NFL high draft picks, at the minimum. Their defense is more sound than LSU's. They finished 6th in total defense last season. Yeah, not legit.

This is beginning to look a lot like pre UDub last season. I was at that game, there were a lot of upset folks after that game. No 30 point win.
Posted by Choctaw
Pumpin' Sunshine
Member since Jul 2007
77774 posts
Posted on 6/10/10 at 11:35 am to
quote:

LSU just has more potential but is hampered by a shitty game plan and poor offensive coaching.


i can't really argue with that....but i watched some UNC games last year and they have nothing...no talent or coaching. Our offense was hampered by our OC being a pussy but the talent and potential have always been there...UNC has none of that...its like a trainwreck. UW's offense is much, much better.

Their defense has much better individual players at certain positions but im not sure they play as well as a unit. They got smoked every time they played an offense that was worth a damn.
This post was edited on 6/10/10 at 11:37 am
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
261256 posts
Posted on 6/10/10 at 11:36 am to
quote:


Their defense has much better individual players at certain positions but im not sure they play as well as a unit. They got smoked every time they played an offense that was worth a damn.


They were 6th in total defense last year, returning almost everyone.
Posted by Choctaw
Pumpin' Sunshine
Member since Jul 2007
77774 posts
Posted on 6/10/10 at 11:38 am to
quote:

They were 6th in total defense last year, returning almost everyone.


They padded their stats against patsies. Im at work so i can't look it up but check out the stats against teams that had a decent offense.
Posted by byubengalboy
Cypress, tx.
Member since Nov 2008
3719 posts
Posted on 6/10/10 at 11:40 am to
quote:

If we lose the UNC game....
I should say when we lose but that would be too controversial....


you said it...now shut the frick up dweeb.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
261256 posts
Posted on 6/10/10 at 11:46 am to
quote:


They padded their stats against patsies. Im at work so i can't look it up but check out the stats against teams that had a decent offense.




That is subjective and open to interpretation..You could say the same for LSU's defense. Though UF didn't score a lot, they had almost 500 yards.

UNC's worst games last season, defensively were against FSU, GT and NC State and Clemson (an OT loss) Their defense gave up 50 fewer YPG than LSU's. They were 8-5, 4-4 conference, lost to PITT in their bowl, though they only gave up 19 pts in the game.

They are legit. Not awesome. People claiming this isn't a legit defense are making a fool of themselves.
Posted by Choctaw
Pumpin' Sunshine
Member since Jul 2007
77774 posts
Posted on 6/10/10 at 11:50 am to
quote:

They are legit. Not awesome. People claiming this isn't a legit defense are making a fool of themselves.


Don't get me wrong...i know they're legit. I just don't think they are the world beaters some are making them out to be....and i don't think it'll be enough to make up for their offense.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
261256 posts
Posted on 6/10/10 at 11:52 am to
quote:


Don't get me wrong...i know they're legit. I just don't think they are the world beaters some are making them out to be....and i don't think it'll be enough to make up for their offense.




I know you do, I was pointing out the post I originally responded to.

quote:

I just don't think they are the world beaters some are making them out to be....and i don't think it'll be enough to make up for their offense.


Remains to be seen. I think this will be a 19-17 type of game with the two inept offenses, though I think LSU will ultimately win.

Posted by Tigerdandy
Member since May 2007
726 posts
Posted on 6/10/10 at 2:15 pm to
quote:

Anyone thinking this is an easy LSU win knows absolutely nothing about football and is embarrassing themselves posting on the board.


That defense you are raving about played in the weak ACC, played Citadel, UConn, E. Carol, G. So, and gave up 400 yds to a poor 4-7 N.C. St. at the end of the yr.

Before you start attacking others for not knowing as much as you, try to know something yourself.
Posted by LSUeehaws25
Member since Feb 2010
143 posts
Posted on 6/10/10 at 2:18 pm to
negatiger
Posted by LSUeehaws25
Member since Feb 2010
143 posts
Posted on 6/10/10 at 2:19 pm to
quote:

That defense you are raving about played in the weak ACC, played Citadel, UConn, E. Carol, G. So, and gave up 400 yds to a poor 4-7 N.C. St. at the end of the yr. Before you start attacking others for not knowing as much as you, try to know something yourself.



+1

The ACC sucks, they dont have an offense
Posted by Nuts4LSU
Washington, DC
Member since Oct 2003
25468 posts
Posted on 6/10/10 at 2:26 pm to
quote:

when les plays an out of conference opponent, when he has time to make a statement, and gary has a chance to put on a show, we roll.


Happy New Year!
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
261256 posts
Posted on 6/10/10 at 2:32 pm to
quote:


Before you start attacking others for not knowing as much as you, try to know something yourself.



UNC finished 6th in total defense. Their whole team is basically returning. I have proved I know more than you in this...and pretty much every other thread you participate in. Not bragging, its not that difficult to know more than you.
Posted by Tigerdandy
Member since May 2007
726 posts
Posted on 6/10/10 at 2:57 pm to
quote:

UNC finished 6th in total defense


Doesn't mean shite when you look at who they played, clueless.

ULL was a top 10 rushing team in the NCAA 2 yrs ago. That didn't mean shite either.

Any team or player can look great in the stats, but when u look at who they played you get a true idea of their ability.

For someone making 800 post a month, you don't know much about football stats or anything else.

Because you post a lot, it don't mean you know a lot.

When you get past college football 101, we can talk again.
Posted by noonan
Nassau Bay, TX
Member since Aug 2005
36904 posts
Posted on 6/10/10 at 3:03 pm to
quote:

negatiger


huh?
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram