- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
If the SEC wins in Alabama court
Posted on 9/3/26 at 5:18 pm
Posted on 9/3/26 at 5:18 pm
Does that supersede what happened today and the players are still ineligible? I’m not the sharpest bowl in the bowl drawer here so I’m just trying to understand what happens after tomorrow?
This post was edited on 9/3/26 at 5:25 pm
Posted on 9/3/26 at 5:20 pm to ArkTiger55
quote:
I’m not the sharpest bowl in the bowl drawer
Obviously.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 5:21 pm to ArkTiger55
quote:
I’m not the sharpest bowl in the bowl drawer here
Ask the forks to help you out
Posted on 9/3/26 at 5:22 pm to RummelTiger
Thanks for being in agreement. And answering the question. Very cosmopolitan.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 5:23 pm to ArkTiger55
Tomorrow?
No one has even been served yet. Get a grip.
No one has even been served yet. Get a grip.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 5:23 pm to SpartanSoul
A grip on what? Not freaking out just trying to follow the timeline here.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 5:27 pm to ArkTiger55
The SEC wants that federal court date pushed out as far as possible so it’s just sitting out there like a ticking time bomb as a deterrent to us rostering the players. They don’t want it heard quickly and then dismissed as they would lose all their leverage.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 5:27 pm to ArkTiger55
quote:
I’m not the sharpest bowl in the bowl drawer here so I’m just
wtf is this??
Posted on 9/3/26 at 5:28 pm to ArkTiger55
That lawsuit should get thrown out.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 5:35 pm to ArkTiger55
The two players will not be added to the roster (tomorrow). The federal case is gonna block that choice for lsu because it won’t be worth it, SEC is threatening to remove LSU with the filing of the case, IMO that is the message. which was the point of filing it. Idk about what you asked directly I think the federal would over rule the state one.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 5:36 pm to ArkTiger55
quote:
If the SEC wins in Alabama court
Doesn't matter what the Court does, it will be appealed by whatever side losses. The rub is if the appellate process drags out beyond the season, and the SEC ultimately prevails, and a player deemed ineligible played in Conference games, those Teams could be forfeiting games.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 5:37 pm to jorconalx
quote:
wtf is this??
quote:
I’m not the sharpest bowl in the bowl drawer
A mixed metaphor, akin to a malapropism
Posted on 9/3/26 at 5:44 pm to ArkTiger55
Alabama case has nothing to do with players eligibility, it is with specific university employees.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 6:05 pm to OchoDedos
quote:
Doesn't matter what the Court does, it will be appealed by whatever side losses. The rub is if the appellate process drags out beyond the season, and the SEC ultimately prevails, and a player deemed ineligible played in Conference games, those Teams could be forfeiting games.
This is the exact reason we should not put them on the roster.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 6:06 pm to ArkTiger55
That suit won't make it past motion practice
Popular
Back to top
9










