- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
I think the SEC just ended any chance of self-governance approval.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 8:08 am
Posted on 9/9/26 at 8:08 am
If anything, this LSU mess has shown that the SEC has done a terrible job proving it can govern itself fairly.
This started over two former NFL players. LSU disagreed with how the SEC handled it and went through the court system instead of just ignoring the rules. LSU also never put Wright or Harris on the final 105-man roster. Yet somehow this turned into talk of huge penalties, federal lawsuits, and even kicking LSU out of the conference.
That is where the SEC’s argument starts falling apart. The SEC is an association made up of its member schools, and LSU is one of its founding members. LSU disagreeing with the commissioner, voting differently, or challenging a rule in court does not mean LSU has “lost institutional control.” It means one member of the association disagrees with how the association is being run.
The SEC cannot argue both ways. It cannot say, “We are a private association and our members govern themselves,” while also acting like LSU has no right to challenge the conference or disagree with its leadership. If LSU is truly part of the SEC, then LSU has every right to speak up when it thinks the SEC is wrong.
What should concern Congress is how quickly this went from a disagreement over two players to the possible removal of a major public university from a billion-dollar conference. A small group of presidents and chancellors can make a decision with enormous financial consequences, while the rules for doing so are extremely broad.
The SEC keeps saying this is about its authority. Maybe that is exactly why Congress should take a closer look. After watching this whole thing play out, “trust us, we can govern ourselves” is becoming a harder argument for the SEC to make.
This started over two former NFL players. LSU disagreed with how the SEC handled it and went through the court system instead of just ignoring the rules. LSU also never put Wright or Harris on the final 105-man roster. Yet somehow this turned into talk of huge penalties, federal lawsuits, and even kicking LSU out of the conference.
That is where the SEC’s argument starts falling apart. The SEC is an association made up of its member schools, and LSU is one of its founding members. LSU disagreeing with the commissioner, voting differently, or challenging a rule in court does not mean LSU has “lost institutional control.” It means one member of the association disagrees with how the association is being run.
The SEC cannot argue both ways. It cannot say, “We are a private association and our members govern themselves,” while also acting like LSU has no right to challenge the conference or disagree with its leadership. If LSU is truly part of the SEC, then LSU has every right to speak up when it thinks the SEC is wrong.
What should concern Congress is how quickly this went from a disagreement over two players to the possible removal of a major public university from a billion-dollar conference. A small group of presidents and chancellors can make a decision with enormous financial consequences, while the rules for doing so are extremely broad.
The SEC keeps saying this is about its authority. Maybe that is exactly why Congress should take a closer look. After watching this whole thing play out, “trust us, we can govern ourselves” is becoming a harder argument for the SEC to make.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 8:13 am to Ebridg3
Sankey was running this like a dictatorship, but like you said, civil debate should be allowed
Sankey instead went the “well if you disagree we will just kick you out” approach.
Sankey instead went the “well if you disagree we will just kick you out” approach.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 8:14 am to schwartzy
Even though you’d think the evidence would have come out already, I keep thinking that the SEC….or someone has something on Kiffin.
That’s all I have. It’s really the only explanation that they have not even mentioned Texas/sc/kentucky/Mizz etc.
It’s like they know they have Kiffin so dead to rights that they are afforded the right to completely ignore the pros on their teams.
That’s all I have. It’s really the only explanation that they have not even mentioned Texas/sc/kentucky/Mizz etc.
It’s like they know they have Kiffin so dead to rights that they are afforded the right to completely ignore the pros on their teams.
This post was edited on 9/9/26 at 8:17 am
Posted on 9/9/26 at 8:18 am to dstone12
If they had something they’d have used it already. Instead we’re getting this clown show.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 8:19 am to Ebridg3
quote:
LSU disagreed with how the SEC handled it and went through the court system instead of just ignoring the rules.
What court system did LSU go through?
Posted on 9/9/26 at 8:20 am to ezride25
quote:
If they had something they’d have used it already. Instead we’re getting this clown show
THIS!!!!
Posted on 9/9/26 at 8:22 am to Ebridg3
I think the conference is inept. They’re making outrageous moves with this, and it makes me wonder if they’re capable of understanding their actions.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 8:37 am to dstone12
Nobody got shite on Kiffin........... at the end of the day this is all about OLE MISS getting KIFFIN cause he went to LSU...would it have been different if it would have been Florida or another school ??????who knows
Kiffin did what was best for Kiffin, and Ole Miss thought they owned him, kiffin ain't done nothin wrong
Kiffin did what was best for Kiffin, and Ole Miss thought they owned him, kiffin ain't done nothin wrong
Posted on 9/9/26 at 8:43 am to Ebridg3
quote:
This started over two former NFL players. LSU disagreed with how the SEC handled it and went through the court system instead of just ignoring the rules.
Not true.
The only court case LSU is a party of is the SEC''s suit filed in ND of Alabama.
This post was edited on 9/9/26 at 8:44 am
Posted on 9/9/26 at 8:52 am to Ebridg3
quote:
LSU disagreed with how the SEC handled it and went through the court system instead of just ignoring the rules.
LSU was not part of the lawsuit. The players filed it.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 9:27 am to ole man
quote:
Nobody got shite on Kiffin........... at the end of the day this is all about OLE MISS getting KIFFIN cause he went to LSU...would it have been different if it would have been Florida or another school ??????who knows
But you don’t double, then triple down with a federal lawsuit and a conference expulsion vote.
Thats what has me thinking that mean ole Lane Kiffin dissing ole miss isn’t all of it.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 10:18 am to dstone12
If you’re an egotistical a-hole you do. If the had shite on KIFFIN it would been exposed long ago
This has turned into a witching and ANY judge worth a shite will call it for what it is ole miss being pissed KIFFIN
Left their arse for a better job. Who the frick do they think they are
This has turned into a witching and ANY judge worth a shite will call it for what it is ole miss being pissed KIFFIN
Left their arse for a better job. Who the frick do they think they are
Popular
Back to top
6









