- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: I Could See it was Clearly an Interception
Posted on 7/18/19 at 4:02 pm to xiv
Posted on 7/18/19 at 4:02 pm to xiv
quote:
It was ruled that the ball touched an out-of-bounds player before possession was attained by PP, and there is no conclusive evidence to the contrary. Notice Ritter said that the call "stands" and not "is confirmed."
That's the whole point. Peterson catches it cleanly and has a foot on the ground. When the receiver touched the ball (if he did) then the play is dead when/if the receiver touches the ball while Peterson has the control.
1
Posted on 7/18/19 at 4:03 pm to xiv
If you are saying the ref pulled that rule out of his arse to make that real time call I would highly doubt it. Or is this you Ritter?
I would say go back to the poliboard but on second thought stay here.
I would say go back to the poliboard but on second thought stay here.
Posted on 7/18/19 at 4:04 pm to xiv
quote:
Whether or not PP possesses the ball is not in question.
Again if he possesses the ball when in bounds the ONLY argument you have is that the player who appears to still be inbounds in your last photo later steps out while touching the ball and thus it is incomplete......now my advice to you is since you have been obviously unmasked as a Bama troll in this post....stick to their boards.
Posted on 7/18/19 at 4:04 pm to TigerLunatik
quote:This is an opinion that you can't prove. Therefore, the call stands.
That's the whole point. Peterson catches it cleanly and has a foot on the ground. When the receiver touched the ball (if he did) then the play is dead when/if the receiver touches the ball while Peterson has the control.
Posted on 7/18/19 at 4:05 pm to themunch
quote:Yeah the refs know the rules of football.
If you are saying the ref pulled that rule out of his arse to make that real time call I would highly doubt it.
Posted on 7/18/19 at 4:05 pm to LSU Bayou Jim
quote:No need to read the rest, then, since you already said it.
Again
Posted on 7/18/19 at 4:13 pm to xiv
Again, PP possesses the ball.....by your own admission.
Again YOUR photos appear to show Bama rec. in with one foot and second foot suspended. THAT, ANYWAY YOU LOOK AT IT IS A CATCH. Your argument is that the receiver was out and touched the ball. PP possesses the ball mkes any touch there after mute. So your only argument is that it does not matter if PP has possession, because a bama player later touches the ball out of bounds.......it just does not hold water AGAIN. AGAIN go to your beloves Bama's boards where every call an SEC ref make is right.....because they ALWAYS favor Bama.
Again YOUR photos appear to show Bama rec. in with one foot and second foot suspended. THAT, ANYWAY YOU LOOK AT IT IS A CATCH. Your argument is that the receiver was out and touched the ball. PP possesses the ball mkes any touch there after mute. So your only argument is that it does not matter if PP has possession, because a bama player later touches the ball out of bounds.......it just does not hold water AGAIN. AGAIN go to your beloves Bama's boards where every call an SEC ref make is right.....because they ALWAYS favor Bama.
Posted on 7/18/19 at 4:15 pm to Thorny
It's an interception. No arguement can be made.
Posted on 7/18/19 at 4:16 pm to LSU Bayou Jim
quote:
Again
quote:Except when applying the rule in the rule book.
ANYWAY YOU LOOK AT IT IS A CATCH
quote:Underlined is problem 1. In bold is problem 2.
PP possesses the ball mkes any touch there after mute.
quote:I'm gonna go out on a limb and guess that my degree from LSU is one more than you have.
AGAIN go to your beloves Bama's boards where every call an SEC ref make is right.....because they ALWAYS favor Bama.
The call was that the ball was touched by an out-of-bounds player before possession was attained by PP, and there is no conclusive evidence to the contrary.
Speaking of "mute" points, the next play was a 3rd and 7, and LSU lost the game by 9. The idea that this call cost LSU the game is the kind of argument a loser makes.
Posted on 7/18/19 at 4:17 pm to ShreveportTiger1987
quote:I'll never stop loving the rant.
No arguement can be made.
Posted on 7/18/19 at 4:17 pm to blueridgeTiger
The NOLA No Call is in a class by itself as an example of bad officiating. Other than that, this is the worst call I have ever seen that had the possibility of being overturned by replay.
Posted on 7/18/19 at 4:18 pm to xiv
quote:
The idea that this call cost LSU the game is the kind of argument a loser makes.
Wow. We actually agree on something.
Posted on 7/18/19 at 4:19 pm to xiv
YOU said he possessed the ball so you are talking yourself in circles........Go back and worship at the alter of Satan.
Posted on 7/18/19 at 4:22 pm to xiv
BY the way, I doubt you have any degree of Louisiana, much less LSU in you and Wrong on the degree. But we see that you have no issue with being wrong and just not having the ability to see.......go to the Little Nicky site now
Posted on 7/19/19 at 10:39 am to blueridgeTiger
Decent photoshop job. What were you really watching on that monitor? Porn?
Posted on 7/19/19 at 12:03 pm to xiv
quote:
In 2009, LSU lost to Alabama by 9. The PP call—a Correct call, as inconvenient as that fact may be—wasn’t worth 9 points.
LSU was one score down with very little time left in the game. The reason we were down 9 is because they gave the ball back to Bama and they scored on that drive. Had they called it an int LSU would have had the chance to go downfield and win the game. That opportunity, however unlikely you think it was, was taken away.
Posted on 7/19/19 at 12:06 pm to blueridgeTiger
I was at that game and they never really showed the replay. The Bama fans around us were saying people at home were saying it was OOB or juggled. LSU fans were texting me saying it was an INT. We got back to the rv not knowing either way and saw the replay. I felt like punching one of those frickers after that.
Posted on 7/19/19 at 12:12 pm to xiv
quote:
you can see clearly that at some point the receiver's hand deflects off the ball.
Uhh, WAT? Peterson cut in front and beat the receiver to the ball. No way that should be ruled that the receiver touched the ball. His hand got knocked out of the way by Peterson's hand and wrist.
No, that was definitely an interception. Bama's defense was dominating our offense, and I give us little to no chance of driving down for a TD, but we should have had the chance to try.
Posted on 7/19/19 at 12:22 pm to Penrod
quote:
Peterson cut in front and beat the receiver to the ball. No way that should be ruled that the receiver touched the ball. His hand got knocked out of the way by Peterson's hand and wrist.
This is the exact same thought I had earlier in the thread. IF the WR touched the ball at all, Peterson already had possession of it with both feet in the field of play.
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News