View in: Desktop
Copyright @2024 TigerDroppings.com. All rights reserved.
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Posted by
Message
I Could See it was Clearly an Interception
Posted by blueridgeTiger on 7/18/19 at 10:29 am12811
Why couldn't the friggin' refs?
re: I Could See it was Clearly an InterceptionPosted by RB10 on 7/18/19 at 10:31 am to blueridgeTiger
re: I Could See it was Clearly an InterceptionPosted by 0 on 7/18/19 at 10:31 am to blueridgeTiger
Have you been living in a bomb shelter for the last 9 years?
re: I Could See it was Clearly an InterceptionPosted by The Creaux on 7/18/19 at 10:33 am to 0
Bruce Willis was a ghost!
re: I Could See it was Clearly an InterceptionPosted by LSU ATC on 7/18/19 at 10:34 am to blueridgeTiger
Clearly a PI no call.....wait, wrong team.
re: I Could See it was Clearly an InterceptionPosted by SammyTiger on 7/18/19 at 10:35 am to blueridgeTiger
SEC Officiating has a Twitter account now
Let them have it
Let them have it
re: I Could See it was Clearly an InterceptionPosted by JETigER on 7/18/19 at 10:43 am to blueridgeTiger
the ref on the field couldn't see it because number 3 was blocking his view.
if the ref on the field had seen it I believe he would have called it an interception.
but because the ref on the field couldn't see it because he was block by number 3, it was a 50/50 call and in 50/50 calls the call should always go to Alabama per the SEC office.
if the ref on the field had seen it I believe he would have called it an interception.
but because the ref on the field couldn't see it because he was block by number 3, it was a 50/50 call and in 50/50 calls the call should always go to Alabama per the SEC office.
re: I Could See it was Clearly an InterceptionPosted by tigerbaw20 on 7/18/19 at 10:43 am to blueridgeTiger
I see they only let you guys watch ESPN classic in prison..
re: I Could See it was Clearly an InterceptionPosted by TigerOnTheMountain on 7/18/19 at 10:44 am to blueridgeTiger
I ate at Chester’s in Blue Ridge last night
re: I Could See it was Clearly an InterceptionPosted by arcalades on 7/18/19 at 10:48 am to blueridgeTiger
They did see it. We all saw it.
TD SponsorTD Fan
USA
Member since 2001
USA
Member since 2001
Thank you for supporting our sponsors Posted by Site Sponsor to Everyone
Advertisement
re: I Could See it was Clearly an InterceptionPosted by ForeverEllisHugh on 7/18/19 at 10:50 am to JETigER
How was it a 50/50 call on replay? I get having a player dart in between the official and the play but there was indisputable video evidence.
re: I Could See it was Clearly an InterceptionPosted by Alldaylong on 7/18/19 at 11:31 am to blueridgeTiger
They in saban's pocket
re: I Could See it was Clearly an InterceptionPosted by Peepdip on 7/18/19 at 11:34 am to The Creaux
M. Night always has the best twists. Did you know that guy with the hair piece was Bruce Willis the entire time?
re: I Could See it was Clearly an InterceptionPosted by timm6971463 on 7/18/19 at 11:46 am to blueridgeTiger
The ref was doing his job making sure bama won!
re: I Could See it was Clearly an InterceptionPosted by Harry Caray on 7/18/19 at 11:48 am to blueridgeTiger
I mean how fricking clear was that replay. That was the day I realized that sports officiating will never be fully unbiased and fair.
re: I Could See it was Clearly an InterceptionPosted by KennesawTiger on 7/18/19 at 11:57 am to JETigER
quote:
if the ref on the field had seen it I believe he would have called it an interception.
It WAS actually called an interception on the field as I recall.
ETA: just re-watched and I guess I remember it wrong.
Still most egregious fix I'd ever seen
This post was edited on 7/18 at 12:04 pm
re: I Could See it was Clearly an InterceptionPosted by Meauxjeaux on 7/18/19 at 12:13 pm to blueridgeTiger
quote:
I Could See it was Clearly an Interception
Why couldn't the friggin' refs?
The only solution is to go to all black referee crews.
The athleticism and speed of the game is beyond the ability of old white men to keep up... even from viewing, much less participating on a rules-interpreting basis.
It is what it is.
(before I get ragged, I watch and slow-mo and rewind and slo-mo and rewind and am amazed at what today's athletes can do... they are making adjustments on the ball, the play, the motion of the other players in real-time speed that is fascinating to watch. I love it... just need to realize it's beyond regular unathletic white men to regulate it)
This post was edited on 7/18 at 12:15 pm
re: I Could See it was Clearly an InterceptionPosted by YouAre8Up on 7/18/19 at 12:14 pm to blueridgeTiger
JFC
re: I Could See it was Clearly an InterceptionPosted by SoulGlo on 7/18/19 at 12:15 pm to KennesawTiger
quote:
Still most egregious fix I'd ever seen
Auburn 06
re: I Could See it was Clearly an InterceptionPosted by xiv on 7/18/19 at 12:34 pm to blueridgeTiger
Because it was an incomplete pass. Before PP possessed the ball, the ball hit the hand of a receiver who was out of bounds.
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News