- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 10/2/08 at 8:52 am to Rouge
Winning is winning. 4-0 is winning. Old Miss beating Fla. is proof you can't take teams for granted. SEC play has started and Vandy is 4-0-that's a fact. He said "right now." Well, Vandy's record is the best it can be right now-undefeated. The fact that Old Miss has been a "bottom feeder" doesn't take away from the fact that they beat Fla. Past seasons don't count towards the current season record. It was a good win for Old Miss and makes Vandy look better for having beat the team that beat Fla. Many different ways to look at it. 4-0 is a good start.
Posted on 10/2/08 at 9:01 am to shrevetigertom
quote:
I agree. I tire of the constant negative posts about the team. My God, if you had told me in the '90's that we would be a perennial top-5 team with 2 NC's I would have laughed my arse off. Keep up the good work.
+1
eta: We will always get the barners best shot. It doesn't matter how bad of a team they have. They just don't seem to play as hard against other teams as they play against us.
This post was edited on 10/2/08 at 9:04 am
Posted on 10/2/08 at 9:06 am to Oily Tigah
quote:
and anyone that keeps up with football knows that's the ranter way of judging a football team.
There, a little more fitting for this board.
I saw where you were going with this Prominent. The sentiment usually goes from thinking the team are world-beaters to having Chicken Little syndrome (the sky is falling). Relax and let some things play out before jumping on or off the bandwagon.
Posted on 10/2/08 at 9:45 am to Croozin2
Remember last year after the Bama game. People said we were lucky, and Bama was a better team. Tell that to the ULM fans. 
Posted on 10/2/08 at 9:49 am to VernonPLSUfan
quote:
How bad does LSU suck?
...they dont
Posted on 10/2/08 at 9:50 am to VernonPLSUfan
quote:
Drunk,stupid people with Tide boxes with rolls or toilet paper on each side in their back windshields who beat their fat wives who wear short sleeve tops to show their flabby arms said we were lucky, and Bama was a better
Fixed it fer 'ya.
Posted on 10/2/08 at 9:52 am to I-59 Tiger
quote:
Drunk,stupid people with Tide boxes with rolls or toilet paper on each side in their back windshields who beat their fat wives who wear short sleeve tops to show their flabby arms said we were lucky, and Bama was a better
SHAKERS!! You forgot the shakers in the back winder of the pick-up truck, 59!!!
Posted on 10/2/08 at 10:01 am to Prominentwon
quote:
...if Vanderbilt beats Auburn? I mean, because since LSU had to come back and all to beat the Tigers in Auburn.
The rules of transitivity do not apply to the outcomes of college football games. Everyone knows that.
Posted on 10/2/08 at 10:05 am to Prominentwon
quote:
that's the retard way of judging a football team.
agree 100%
just too bad the writers don't see it that way.
Posted on 10/2/08 at 10:07 am to Prominentwon
quote:
There was ALOT of comparing schedules and scores for a few days. ...and anyone that keeps up with football knows that's the retard way of judging a football team.
I agree. Goofy thing is, it seems to be about the main basis for the whole computer polling system.
Posted on 10/2/08 at 10:09 am to Prominentwon
quote:
How bad does LSU suck if Vanderbilt beats Auburn?
4-0...not too bad IMHO. Would suck for Auburn though. Maybe they lose because we destroyed their year so early. How does Aubbie losing affect our win? It doesn't, so what's the point?
Posted on 10/2/08 at 10:15 am to TigerWatch
Another retarded post... what kind of answer are you looking for??
"oh yea, well if Vandy beats Auburn, then LSU will increase in suckage by 73.2%" Retarded
Also, look at LSU/Bama last year... it was an incredibly close game that came down to a late game fumble that went to LSU's favor... Alabama, SUCKED last year, but pulled their A game out for LSU. If Auburn plays shitty for the rest of the year, it certainly won't translate into LSU "sucking"... especially if LSU continues to win. The worst it will do is hurt our strength of schedule.

"oh yea, well if Vandy beats Auburn, then LSU will increase in suckage by 73.2%" Retarded
Also, look at LSU/Bama last year... it was an incredibly close game that came down to a late game fumble that went to LSU's favor... Alabama, SUCKED last year, but pulled their A game out for LSU. If Auburn plays shitty for the rest of the year, it certainly won't translate into LSU "sucking"... especially if LSU continues to win. The worst it will do is hurt our strength of schedule.
Posted on 10/2/08 at 10:32 am to Prominentwon
dude really?
your a mcneese fan
your a mcneese fan
Posted on 10/2/08 at 11:08 am to iambigwilley
quote:
dude really?
your a mcneese fan
um......BOOM?
Posted on 10/2/08 at 11:26 am to TigerWatch
quote:
...if Vanderbilt beats Auburn? I mean, because since LSU had to come back and all to beat the Tigers in Auburn.
LSU had lost "one game" experience due to hurricane.
...besides, I did not realize that points in the first half counted more than those in the second half...go figure.
Posted on 10/2/08 at 12:22 pm to Archie Bengal Bunker
you cant compare two teams by common opponents. Even tho it can be used as a tie breaker, it is ridiculous to think that Auburn will get as hyped for Vandy as they would for us. All teams play all other teams differently.
Posted on 10/2/08 at 1:01 pm to Prominentwon
i agree prom.
and it seems there are a lot of people on here that cannot detect sarcasm.
and it seems there are a lot of people on here that cannot detect sarcasm.
Posted on 10/2/08 at 1:53 pm to Prominentwon
quote:
How bad does LSU suck?
...if Vanderbilt beats Auburn? I mean, because since LSU had to come back and all to beat the Tigers in Auburn.
AU could lose to Vandy by 40 and LSU would still not suck the way you do sonny.
Popular
Back to top

0









