Started By
Message

re: Former tennis player goes public on Davis.*Interesting Updates*

Posted on 11/19/20 at 9:48 pm to
Posted by saintsfan22
baton rouge
Member since May 2006
71523 posts
Posted on 11/19/20 at 9:48 pm to
quote:

I'm saying her behavior ain't normal for one, that's bc she's being put up to this



Put up to what? You think this is a 3 year long con?
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
94906 posts
Posted on 11/19/20 at 9:51 pm to
quote:

the attacks on the victim or the white knighting for her.

Really? You are struggling with this?
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
94906 posts
Posted on 11/19/20 at 9:55 pm to
Not a coincidence. Weirdos like you I am sure have been ripping her on social media
Posted by Mithridates6
Member since Oct 2019
8220 posts
Posted on 11/19/20 at 9:58 pm to
Wrong. And there was another girl who went public just to cancel ZVR on Twitter a couple of days ago. She was that traumatized by Zack's statement of facts that she had to break her silence! Please don't put two and two together folks !!
LINK
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
94906 posts
Posted on 11/19/20 at 9:59 pm to
You realize Davis was arrested multiple times, is on video, and actually pled guilty to the abuse right?

I mean I’m just trying to see if you are really confused, trolling, or just crazy
Posted by DBG
vermont
Member since May 2004
71374 posts
Posted on 11/19/20 at 10:02 pm to
quote:

I’m not sure which is worse, the attacks on the victim or the white knighting for her.


Imagine having a hard time deciding which of these is worse. On one hand you have people attacking a known, confirmed abuse victim because she spoke out against the tennis coach and disgraced former football player, neither of which this board gave a flying frick about 72 hours ago. On the other you have people defending her and saying abuse isn’t okay.

Gee, very tough choice.
Posted by I20goon
about 7mi down a dirt road
Member since Aug 2013
12863 posts
Posted on 11/19/20 at 10:11 pm to
quote:

the attacks on the victim or the white knighting for her.
quote:

Really? You are struggling with this?
I'm sort of with him on that.

On one hand, the attacks on the victim are always bad. If it turns out the victim is scamming or lying later, well she's not a victim anymore so it isn't really "victim shaming" anymore. In this case, we know enough about what Davis did and she was attacked at least twice.

On the other hand, the white knighting comment isn't a comment on her, the victim. It's the people out there who will use her and her situation for their own ends. The white knighting he refers to is a skewing of information; and it almost always to benefit the one doing the skewing, not the victim. In fact, it usually hurts the victim because after the white knighting, the full and true story follows... and of course they don't match. She can be a victim with faults. Many have pointed that out many times already in this thread.

Anyone white knighting her is trying to skew or hide those faults. And when it comes out different later, it absolutely hurts the victim's credibility in many corner. It's best to use the facts and let the faults/imperfections be laid bare from the beginning.
Posted by misey94
Hernando, MS
Member since Jan 2007
23327 posts
Posted on 11/20/20 at 12:27 am to
quote:

I don’t know how anyone in the LSU admin survives this


The people who are directly linked and have evidence against them are going to get fired. It may not happen tomorrow, but it’s going to happen. It could even go worse for them than just being fired since Title IX is federal law. However, right now it’s the Tennis coaches, the trainer and Verge Ausberry. I’m sure others across the University will be implicated, but who knows how many and what departments they will be in.

If Alleva and Alexander were still here, I don’t think they could skate on this. However, I don’t think there is any way Woodward takes any kind of fall for this. He’s actually set up to be the hero if he handles the investigation and aftermath right. And the President is interim, so who knows with him. He may not be retained, but he isn’t to blame for any of this.

Unless ironclad evidence comes out against Orgeron, he’s not getting fired. He would sue over anything short of that and the school would still have to pay a big settlement in place of a buyout. The only way to fire him with cause and avoid a suit is to have irrefutable evidence. Im not saying that can’t happen, but you would think USA Today would have hammered that for more attention after a year of digging if they had any direct links. They trashed a few players who were cleared of their issues, but they clearly danced around pointing any direct allegations at Orgeron.
Posted by LSU2NO
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2007
1921 posts
Posted on 11/20/20 at 8:05 am to
Let me preface this by saying I believe strongly all the allegations are true. There is overwhelming evidence.

I might get blasted for this, but after reading the article Friday morning in the Advocate, it did not mention that the victim went directly to the Tennis coach. Stay with me. First it said that her father brought up 'potential' abuse in 2017 to the male coach, not the victim. Also, the other tennis players reached out to Julia Sells, but she did not act on it.

The Sells stated that the allegations where never disclosed to us and they complied with reporting protocols.

My question is, does the 'protocols' require the abused/victim to reach out to the LSU official personally or does any form of allegations by close family and friends sufficient enough to start the Title IX process? The same question could be said for Verge. Protocol.

Edited: I answered my question. Verge and the Sells should have contacted LSU official and proceeded with Title IX.

The policy is clear "Any member of the University community who believes that he or she has been subjected to sexual harassment has a right and an obligation to report it to any University official, supervisor, or the Office of Human Resource Management."
This post was edited on 11/20/20 at 8:13 am
Posted by Nutriaitch
Montegut
Member since Apr 2008
7489 posts
Posted on 11/20/20 at 8:20 am to
quote:

My question is, does the 'protocols' require the abused/victim to reach out to the LSU official personally or does any form of allegations by close family and friends sufficient enough to start the Title IX process? The same question could be said for Verge. Protocol.


my understanding (may not be correct) is that once a University official become aware of an allegation, they must report it to Title IX.
i don’t think it specifies that the victim themselves have to make the accusation.
Posted by SlidellCajun
Slidell la
Member since May 2019
10349 posts
Posted on 11/20/20 at 8:22 am to
This is more of an indictment of coach Sell than LSU in general. The athletic director also gets lumped in since this seems to be systemic in the athletetic department.

Inn not aware of any NON athletic sexual assaults that have been ignored


What will happen here is that the atheistic dept likely gets a heavy weeding if not a gut job.
Posted by Roscoe
Member since Sep 2007
2913 posts
Posted on 11/20/20 at 8:58 am to
quote:

This is more of an indictment of coach Sell than LSU in general.


Seems like the Sells were doing pretty well rebuilding the program. Not sure how they survive this.

UVas former head coach is from Lafayette and did pretty well there making UVa into an ACC Champion and regular NCAA tournament team during his tenure there. He also did pretty well at Kentucky before going to UVa. He stepped down a few years ago and returned back to Lafayette.

May be a great hire if he is interested in returning to coaching if the Sells get canned.
Posted by misey94
Hernando, MS
Member since Jan 2007
23327 posts
Posted on 11/20/20 at 8:59 am to
quote:

Edited: I answered my question. Verge and the Sells should have contacted LSU official and proceeded with Title IX.


Yep. Considering that there are already multiple witnesses lined up against the Sells, I don’t see how they survive. Ausberry is in the same boat since his has now gone on record about his involvement. It will be interesting to see how many more people school-wide this thing will eventually connect to.
Posted by Peepdip
Member since Aug 2016
4946 posts
Posted on 11/20/20 at 9:56 am to
quote:

I was thinking the same thing. If a woman wears a provocative piece of clothing and goes to a casino then it's okay to rape her?
To the incels on this board, yes
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
81604 posts
Posted on 11/20/20 at 10:02 am to
quote:

If you're talking about victims who are minors, it's not the same thing.


Why?
Posted by Old Money
Member since Sep 2012
36321 posts
Posted on 11/20/20 at 10:24 am to
This girl has 0 to gain going public with this. Some of the comments in this thread are just awful. Imagine if this was your daughter, sister, or something your mother had to go through... we all love the University and its reputation is everything. A rape culture is not a safe place for young women, and the girls are frankly the best part about LSU. The part we all love, and we should protect as men.

Sad to see adults fail these kids. Very sad.
This post was edited on 11/20/20 at 10:24 am
Posted by tigerbaitlawyer
Member since Jun 2016
1733 posts
Posted on 11/20/20 at 10:26 am to
A large fact is missing. The Tennis player was not a student at LSU when the incident occurred. Drake told Verge she was lying in the phone conversation. Verge told Drake to cooperate with the police and to report the incident. Verge took all necessary steps.

A title IX report would not pertain to non LSU students. Drake was punished by LSU and prosecuted by the 19th JDC DA.
This post was edited on 11/20/20 at 10:29 am
Posted by Tzanghi
Member since Nov 2020
757 posts
Posted on 11/20/20 at 10:30 am to
Apparently that’s not enough for the public these days.
Posted by dagrippa
Saigon
Member since Nov 2004
11286 posts
Posted on 11/20/20 at 10:37 am to
I've been wondering if there is some reason for this title IX case to shake out like it has. Up until this report it seems that LSU had been overzealously safe when handling serious issues. We will see.
Posted by tigerbaitlawyer
Member since Jun 2016
1733 posts
Posted on 11/20/20 at 10:41 am to
This is nothing more than a shake up to get LSU to pay a non-student!!!!

Lsu took the proper actions. Drake was removed and prosecuted.
Jump to page
Page First 15 16 17 18 19 ... 21
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 17 of 21Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram