Started By
Message

re: Footballscoop says Joe “burned away $1.5M” with Les payment

Posted on 11/18/18 at 4:37 pm to
Posted by Tigers4life
The great US of A
Member since May 2004
1976 posts
Posted on 11/18/18 at 4:37 pm to
Yep...LSU got squeezed...plan and simple. Only thing is...they didn't care because they were able to get miles off there balance sheet at a discounted price.
Posted by Battle
Member since Oct 2018
164 posts
Posted on 11/18/18 at 4:38 pm to
Yes. Every decision Alleva makes is the wrong decision
Posted by TheDeathValley
Louisiana
Member since Sep 2010
20616 posts
Posted on 11/18/18 at 4:45 pm to
Alleva made a hedge bet.
Posted by supatigah
CEO of the Keith Hernandez Fan Club
Member since Mar 2004
90064 posts
Posted on 11/18/18 at 4:46 pm to
This was not Alleva's decision alone

Alleva doesnt have approval level high enough to stroke a $1.5mm check

He definitely recommended to FKA that they cut the check, but JA didnt make that decision on his own

The thing is, they cut the check and are now done with it. So regardless what happens with Miles now, they are free and clear.

Only Miles, his agent and Jeff Long know how close they were to a deal. Alleva certainly didnt know.

Even if JA suspected KU and Miles were close, he has an opportunity to get the Miles deal off the books with $5mm savings, you take it. Now it doesnt matter what happens with KU, Miles is in the rearview window for LSU
This post was edited on 11/18/18 at 4:49 pm
Posted by Walnut
Houston, TX
Member since Nov 2014
3943 posts
Posted on 11/18/18 at 4:54 pm to
I don't like Alleva but this is one of the few times he *didn't* frick up

LSU got a good deal on this
Posted by JPinLondon
not in London (currently NW Ohio)
Member since Nov 2006
7873 posts
Posted on 11/18/18 at 5:57 pm to
quote:

Looks like Kansas would of paid off the balance during his remaining term.

Why do smart people type "would of" when such a gaffe makes it appear as if you don't know basic grammar? Because, clearly, you DO have basic grammar skills.

And don't say "typo" or "auto-correct". Bull shite.
Posted by Nutriaitch
Montegut
Member since Apr 2008
10923 posts
Posted on 11/18/18 at 6:08 pm to
quote:

LSU got a good deal on this


paid $1.5 million MORE than they would have owed if they waited less than a week.
Posted by lostinbr
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Oct 2017
12849 posts
Posted on 11/18/18 at 6:24 pm to
quote:

paid $1.5 million MORE than they would have owed if they waited less than a week.

So your contention is that, week ago, everyone should have assumed there was a 100% chance that Les Miles would:
1. Sign a contract immediately
2. Sign a contract that was worth more than $1.6MM/year
3. Sign a contract that was not back-loaded to take advantage of the LSU buyout money in the first 1-2 years
And,
4. Keep getting paid on that new contract through 2022.

Because all of these things have to happen for LSU to be completely free of their obligations to Les Miles without a deal. Anyone saying the athletic department should have given him $0 is saying that a there was a 100% chance all of these things would happen a week ago.
Posted by Walnut
Houston, TX
Member since Nov 2014
3943 posts
Posted on 11/18/18 at 6:43 pm to
quote:

paid $1.5 million MORE than they would have owed if they waited less than a week.

You're applying hindsight to contract negotiations; it doesn't really work that way

LSU had no knowledge of how much Kansas would offer Les or even if a solid offer was in hand, and they were looking to settle and save as much money as possible. Frankly it would've been a bone headed move to roll the dice and wait, because there was a high probability that Kansas low-balled Les' salary, leaving LSU to foot the remainder of the bill and pay more than $1.5 million.

Les ended up ahead by making more money overall than he would have, LSU ended up ahead by getting Les off of the books for $5 million less than they contractually had projected, Kansas ended up ahead by getting a slam dunk hire by their standards secure and in their camp.
Posted by Nutriaitch
Montegut
Member since Apr 2008
10923 posts
Posted on 11/18/18 at 6:49 pm to
quote:

So your contention is that, week ago, everyone should have assumed there was a 100% chance that Les Miles would:


my contention is that a week ago it was widely reported that he was the front runner for a Power 5 head coaching gig.

waiting another couple weeks or so to see what happens wasn’t going to hurt LSU.

Les jumping at giving up $5mil told me right away the Kansas thing was all but done. Posted as much on other boards almost immediately after it was announced.

said then that it would soon be announced that Les was gonna sign with KU for enough money that LSU would have owed $0.




Posted by The Mick
Member since Oct 2010
45124 posts
Posted on 11/18/18 at 6:58 pm to
I agree with the article ( I think). Someone tell me how it’s wrong.
Posted by TriumphTiger
Alpharetta, GA
Member since Sep 2007
10446 posts
Posted on 11/18/18 at 6:59 pm to
This was all above the board (but behind the scenes). LSU, Kansas, and Les all worked together to come up with the numbers. LSU did just fine. Kansas and Les could have stuck it to LSU.
Posted by nitwit
Member since Oct 2007
13091 posts
Posted on 11/18/18 at 6:59 pm to
Les has no duty to mitigate.
He is entitled to the full benefit of his bargain.
Both sides did the right thing here, but Les could have driven a harder bargain if he was not a gentleman.
Posted by The Mick
Member since Oct 2010
45124 posts
Posted on 11/18/18 at 7:00 pm to
How could Les and Kansas have driven a harder bargain?
Posted by lostinbr
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Oct 2017
12849 posts
Posted on 11/18/18 at 7:07 pm to
quote:

my contention is that a week ago it was widely reported that he was the front runner for a Power 5 head coaching gig.

Ok, I think that addresses point number 1:
quote:

1. Sign a contract immediately
although I would argue that it still wasn’t a 100% lock.

Regardless, that doesn’t address the other 3 things that have to happen for LSU to owe Les Miles $0:
quote:

2. Sign a contract that was worth more than $1.6MM/year
3. Sign a contract that was not back-loaded to take advantage of the LSU buyout money in the first 1-2 years
And,
4. Keep getting paid on that new contract through 2022.

quote:

waiting another couple weeks or so to see what happens wasn’t going to hurt LSU.

Unless Miles doesn’t sign a contract that meets all four of the criteria above, in which case he walks away from the negotiating table. And even if he DID sign a contract, we would still potentially be out more money if he got fired before 2022.
Posted by The Mick
Member since Oct 2010
45124 posts
Posted on 11/18/18 at 7:11 pm to
Nice breakdown, makes sense
Posted by lostinbr
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Oct 2017
12849 posts
Posted on 11/18/18 at 7:14 pm to
quote:

How could Les and Kansas have driven a harder bargain?

For one, they could have agreed to a contract that was mostly incentive-based for the first two years, with more guaranteed money in years 3-4. They could have done this in a way that allowed Les to make the same amount of money over the four-year period but still milked his buyout money from LSU early, which would allow Kansas to pay less out of their pockets.
Posted by The Mick
Member since Oct 2010
45124 posts
Posted on 11/18/18 at 7:17 pm to
Gotcha, thx
Posted by boxcar willie
kenner
Member since Mar 2011
16174 posts
Posted on 11/18/18 at 7:22 pm to
Les could have sat back and made 5 mill for doing nothing. The 1.5 was money well spent just to be free and clear of him. Anyone who thinks other wise is plainly a simple minded fool.
Posted by supatigah
CEO of the Keith Hernandez Fan Club
Member since Mar 2004
90064 posts
Posted on 11/18/18 at 7:23 pm to
quote:

Les ended up ahead by making more money overall than he would have, LSU ended up ahead by getting Les off of the books for $5 million less than they contractually had projected, Kansas ended up ahead by getting a slam dunk hire by their standards secure and in their camp.


yes, a rare example of "everybody wins"
why is this bad? negotiations dont always have to have a winner and a loser, there can simply be a fair deal for both sides and that is it

first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram