Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Flock camera news out of God’s country

Posted on 9/24/26 at 10:19 am
Posted by SuperSaint
Sorting Out OT BS Since '2007'
Member since Sep 2007
151883 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 10:19 am
LINK

quote:

On a 3-2 vote, the Board of Supervisors declined to negotiate a contract with Flock, and told the Sheriff’s Office to direct Flock to end its access to an existing 63 cameras across the county and to remove the cameras as soon as possible, or within 60 days.




Posted by Cosmo
glassman's guest house
Member since Oct 2003
133135 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 10:27 am to
People there are probably worried ICE is using the cameras to get illegals
Posted by Cycledude
Member since Jul 2018
2473 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 10:29 am to
It’s like throwing the baby out with the bathwater.
Posted by East Coast Band
Member since Nov 2010
67164 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 10:36 am to
Cameras will eventually be installed by someone at some point.
Posted by lsufan1971
Zachary
Member since Nov 2003
24527 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 10:52 am to
All of these people ppl e that are outraged don’t realize their every day activities are being monitored just by driving around with the smart phones on. Also anytime you walk into a major airport your face is getting scanned. Your checked bags are being opened and rifled through.

Public highways are just that public and there isn’t a right to privacy. Any officer can run your tag anytime he wants. These Flock cameras aren’t hitting live DMV databases. They are hitting hit sheets of stolen vehicles, amber alerts and BOLO.
This post was edited on 9/24/26 at 10:55 am
Posted by el Gaucho
He/They
Member since Dec 2010
60656 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 10:55 am to
quote:

Gods country

quote:

county

God’s country is a parish
Posted by LegendInMyMind
Member since Apr 2019
76737 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 10:55 am to
quote:

All of these people ppl e that are outraged don’t realize their every day activities are being monitored just by driving around with the smart phones on. Also anytime you walk into a major airport your face is getting scanned. Your checked bags are being opened and rifled through.

Alright.

Then, we have zero need for this new surveillance, do we?
Posted by lsufan1971
Zachary
Member since Nov 2003
24527 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 10:57 am to
quote:

Then, we have zero need for this new surveillance, do we?


ALPR isn’t new. It’s been used since the 90’s.
Posted by LegendInMyMind
Member since Apr 2019
76737 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 10:58 am to
quote:

These Flock cameras aren’t hitting live DMV databases. They are hitting hit sheets of stolen vehicles, amber alerts and BOLO.

They do a whole hell of a lot more than that, and it has been admitted by Flock in its own testing and demonstrations.
Posted by LegendInMyMind
Member since Apr 2019
76737 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 10:59 am to
quote:

ALPR isn’t new. It’s been used since the 90’s.

Cool.

We already have it, so we don't need Flock, right? It is waste of money and a needless redundancy.
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
78460 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 11:02 am to
quote:

ALPR isn’t new. It’s been used since the 90’s.
Then why do we need Flock?
Posted by lsufan1971
Zachary
Member since Nov 2003
24527 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 11:04 am to
quote:

Then why do we need Flock?


Flock is just one company doing ALPR. I could care less about Flock.
Posted by lsufan1971
Zachary
Member since Nov 2003
24527 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 11:07 am to
quote:

It is waste of money and a needless redundancy.


I’m speaking of ALPR in general. It helps solve 1000’s of violent crimes per year. It helps find missing kids, dementia patients etc. it’s a valuable tool. Whether you agree with it or not.
This post was edited on 9/24/26 at 11:08 am
Posted by LegendInMyMind
Member since Apr 2019
76737 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 11:09 am to
quote:

Flock is just one company doing ALPR. I could care less about Flock.

If Flock and similar companies are breaking no new technological ground that advances the surveillance state beyond what it is already capable of, why the push for these new systems? We don't need them if everything it does is already being done. It offers no advantage, per you and others who share your opinion. Therefore, it has to be a waste of taxpayer money on a needless system that is at best wholly redundant.

Why do we need it?
This post was edited on 9/24/26 at 11:10 am
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
78460 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 11:09 am to
quote:

Flock is just one company doing ALPR. I could care less about Flock.
So, no one should care if it is banned then.

Will save taxpayer money.
This post was edited on 9/24/26 at 11:10 am
Posted by LegendInMyMind
Member since Apr 2019
76737 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 11:10 am to
quote:

I’m speaking of ALPR in general.

Do Flock and similar systems have any difference beyond traditional ALPR? Do these systems have any new technological capabilities?
This post was edited on 9/24/26 at 11:11 am
Posted by jbgleason
Bailed out of BTR to God's Country
Member since Mar 2012
20539 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 11:19 am to
quote:

lsufan1971


I think you are missing the point here. Law Enforcement organizations have ALPR and have had it for years. That's one thing.

Having the government team up with FLOCK (a private company) is something else entirely. FLOCK is collecting all this info as a third party non-governmental organization and then selling that info to other private organizations. Obviously they can buy their own land, put out their own cameras and capture this info in 4th Amendment allowable ways. That's fine.

But I don't want my tax dollars and my government assisting them.

Second point, ALPR is a system that captures some pretty specific data. FLOCK systems are capturing way, way more. For instance, tracking bluetooth identifiers and WiFi signal identifiers. Grabbing facial recognition. Things that are way more intrusive than my plate number.
This post was edited on 9/24/26 at 11:21 am
Posted by IndianPower
Louisiana
Member since May 2021
2435 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 12:11 pm to
You are partially correct.

Until you gather all your facts please come back and tell us what you have learned.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram