- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 11/9/25 at 5:52 pm to Tiger1242
He disnt fulfill expected job duties expected of him
Posted on 11/9/25 at 5:53 pm to Tiger on the Rag
If he doesn’t want his peccadillos exposed he will agree to a lower buyout.
Posted on 11/9/25 at 5:58 pm to idlewatcher
quote:
“I’m open to a negotiated buyout” His words. Now of course he’s backtracking like the b*tch he is
He’s not backtracking.
Everything he says is calculated and a PR move.
He says that statement to make folks think, wow, what a stand up guy.
But he knew all along he’s getting the full amount, period.
Kelly is the biggest sleezebag in sports. Did you really think he was going to take less than he was promised?
Posted on 11/9/25 at 6:06 pm to Tiger1242
Only thing I would negotiate is the date each payment is to be made and to which account
Posted on 11/9/25 at 6:22 pm to idlewatcher
If someone owed you $54 million, would you take less? The answer is no.
Posted on 11/9/25 at 6:27 pm to idlewatcher
quote:
“I’m open to a negotiated buyout” His words. Now of course he’s backtracking like the b*tch he is
“open to negotiate” does not mean “take whatever offer LSU throws out”
Posted on 11/9/25 at 6:28 pm to Tiger1242
Time value of money
Posted on 11/9/25 at 7:04 pm to Tiger1242
Because he clearly failed ABYSMALLY, so if he had any integrity as a man, he'd stop stealing from us. He clearly took the job then half assed it. He's pure scum. It's amazing how that doesn't bother some of you. He's a thief with no integrity.
This post was edited on 11/9/25 at 7:06 pm
Posted on 11/9/25 at 7:06 pm to RGT
quote:
If he doesn’t want his peccadillos exposed he will agree to a lower buyout.
This is stupid. Do you not understand how the termination for cause works?
Posted on 11/9/25 at 7:16 pm to Tiger1242
If he gets another Job, LSU only owes the difference in salary from what he was getting here.
If he is planning on coaching again, he would be wise to negotiate a one time lump sum of 25-30 million.
Example. Lets say he goes to UCLA for 8 mill/year 5 year deal. He would only get 2 mill/yr from LSU. So in theory he would get 10ish mill from LSU.
If he negotiated the one time up front lump sum of 25 million, then he would get 25 mill + 8 mill/yr new job.
Over 5 years the difference in that scenario would be 65 million to 50 million.
If he doesn't want to coach again, then he should not settle
If he is planning on coaching again, he would be wise to negotiate a one time lump sum of 25-30 million.
Example. Lets say he goes to UCLA for 8 mill/year 5 year deal. He would only get 2 mill/yr from LSU. So in theory he would get 10ish mill from LSU.
If he negotiated the one time up front lump sum of 25 million, then he would get 25 mill + 8 mill/yr new job.
Over 5 years the difference in that scenario would be 65 million to 50 million.
If he doesn't want to coach again, then he should not settle
Posted on 11/9/25 at 7:30 pm to Tiger1242
He learned real estate and gymnastics during his time in Baton Rouge
This post was edited on 11/9/25 at 7:31 pm
Posted on 11/9/25 at 7:31 pm to Tiger1242
It is called the "present value of money".
Posted on 11/9/25 at 7:33 pm to Tiger1242
Because we threaten him with the mafia
Posted on 11/9/25 at 7:39 pm to Tiger1242
Muh affair.
Posted on 11/9/25 at 7:46 pm to Tiger1242
Because we have justifiable cause. He ain’t getting more than he was offered.
Posted on 11/9/25 at 7:49 pm to Tiger1242
The 54 is tied to an offset. If he gets a coaching job that pays 5 million a year, our payments would use the 5 million as an offset. If we do a negotiated buyout for 25 million, he gets the 25 million with no offset.
If he plans to coach again, he wants a buyout. If he is retiring, he will take all of his 54 million
If he plans to coach again, he wants a buyout. If he is retiring, he will take all of his 54 million
Posted on 11/9/25 at 7:56 pm to WaydownSouth
quote:
If he gets another Job, LSU only owes the difference in salary from what he was getting here. If he is planning on coaching again, he would be wise to negotiate a one time lump sum of 25-30 million. Example. Let’s say he goes to UCLA for 8 mill/year 5 year deal. He would only get 2 mill/yr from LSU. So in theory he would get 10ish mill from LSU. If he negotiated the one time up front lump sum of 25 million, then he would get 25 mill + 8 mill/yr new job. Over 5 years the difference in that scenario would be 65 million to 50 million. If he doesn't want to coach again, then he should not settle
Great explanation. He wants to coach again from my understanding. Like you said it allows him to maximize his money in his next contract.
Posted on 11/9/25 at 7:58 pm to TheDrunkenTigah
quote:
Y’all have this backwards. If he plans to work again he is going to make 9.5 mil a year no matter what. He has no reason to accept any reduction if he plans to work for the next 6 years either way.
Nah. You got it backwards. If he doesn’t settle, and LSU continues his monthly payments, whatever he gets from his next school will subtracted, or fully cancel out what LSU owes him, depending on the amount.
Posted on 11/9/25 at 8:04 pm to Tiger1242
Up front money.
Won’t have to subtract future income.
Skeletons in the closet.
Won’t have to subtract future income.
Skeletons in the closet.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News