- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 9/13/16 at 10:54 am to roygu
quote:
Maybe! He started under Miles and started one game. Woulda been coulda been doesn't count
RP was 2-0 in 2007. Flynn went 10-2.
Posted on 9/13/16 at 10:57 am to ccox11
Mile's said this, and I believe it's true, when the quarterback makes the throws, the offense works. With just the few completions Etling made that did damage (converting 3rd down, long TD), the run game was able to be dominant and eat the clock. That is Miles' offensive scheme forever. The qb don't have to win games, but he has to pose the threat of being able to win games. Harris' problem is that he is an excellent practice guy. Everyone who played sports has seen these guys who tear it up at practice and suck in the games. That is Harris, and it's a mental problem. Miles problem is that he is so narrow minded he can't swallow the fact that Harris is not going to be the same in games that he is in practice. Now Etling has a small windoW to prove himself, but if he struggles too much, we will be back to Harris.
This post was edited on 9/13/16 at 11:10 am
Posted on 9/13/16 at 11:08 am to YouAre8Up
quote:
HIs love affair with JJ was too strong for Mett to see the field.
Jordan Jefferson and Jarrett Lee in 2011 both completed a higher percentage of passes and had a higher QB rating than Mett had in 2012. You may think the NC game goes differently with Mett back there, but there is nothing that supports that statistically.
Posted on 9/13/16 at 11:11 am to Mo Jeaux
quote:Still nothing of substance, smh.
Keep trying, sweetie. I'm sure Miles will change his ways!
Posted on 9/13/16 at 11:17 am to bellewr
quote:LSU 2011 QBR 147+
The reason Mett didn't play in 2011 was because of CLM's affinity for seniority. With the play that we could put together that year, there would have been no doubt of victory at Bama, and thus, no rematch. Les was just too hard-headed to give Mett a chance
LSU 2012 QBR , 127
Keep up, or at least try.
Posted on 9/13/16 at 11:23 am to Mayhawman
If Mett had seen more PT during all the blowouts in 2011 I would bet he would've beaten bama in 2012. We had plenty of opportunities to develop him more in 2011
Posted on 9/13/16 at 11:24 am to ready4something
quote:
perrilloux would have been great.
RP WAS great in his limited 2 starts.
20 for 25 vs. MTSU
20 for 30 vs. Tenn (SEC-CG MVP)
40 for 55 as a starter.
Posted on 9/13/16 at 11:30 am to Topwater Trout
quote:Hell, if Mett and Jarvis would have just been given a chance to complete that 3rd and 6 at the end of the game, Mett *would* have beaten Bama. I'm still pissed about that call. Mett played great that game. We absolutely handed Bama a chance at game-and-Chavis on that stupid, conservative 3rd down call. ARGH!
If Mett had seen more PT during all the blowouts in 2011 I would bet he would've beaten bama in 2012.
This post was edited on 9/13/16 at 11:31 am
Posted on 9/13/16 at 11:36 am to Topwater Trout
quote:
has thrown 14 passes chief...lets not anoint him as the next Hodson yet
We're not. But he can hit a 10 yd curl. So he's instantly better.
Posted on 9/13/16 at 11:45 am to Topwater Trout
quote:In game development is overblown by folks who only trust what they see.
We had plenty of opportunities to develop him more in 2011
Check Flynn's att prior to Miami. Explain RP success on maybe 10 att priot to MTSU and 50 att prior to UTk.
Explain the number of 1st year starters rantards constantly spout off about who do well.
Posted on 9/13/16 at 12:02 pm to ccox11
This is true. But it's been pointed out about a million times in the last 2 years. It certainly doesn't warrant a new thread.
Posted on 9/13/16 at 12:11 pm to ccox11
Ryan Perriloux was a good QB 
Posted on 9/13/16 at 12:24 pm to Choctaw
quote:
Didn't Flynn get here in '04?
No. Flynn and Russell both got here in 2003 and spent 2 years under Saban.
Posted on 9/13/16 at 12:30 pm to Mayhawman
Etling will prove to be very good if our Oline improves. He's the perfect qb for this system. Traditional pro system is still successful in college and NFL if ran properly with the right qb. Etling is that guy. And so is Brennan. Too bad miles can't see what he truly needs at qb
This post was edited on 9/13/16 at 12:32 pm
Posted on 9/13/16 at 12:34 pm to ccox11
Of course the narrative would have completely changed if Ryan P had stayed. He would have flourished as the starter after Flynn left IMO
Posted on 9/13/16 at 12:39 pm to slackster
Im still bugged by the fact that they went with the duel threat approach and implemented Jennings over Rettig. I think Rettig had the tools to be solid in a pro style offense if someone in this organization had the slightest ability to develop a QB.
Posted on 9/13/16 at 12:51 pm to BeauxNArreaux
quote:
Im still bugged by the fact that they went with the duel threat approach and implemented Jennings over Rettig
Jennings was a pro-style QB too.
Posted on 9/13/16 at 1:08 pm to slackster
quote:
You may think the NC game goes differently with Mett back there, but there is nothing that supports that statistically.
the point was Les didn't even TRY a different QB to try to generate a spark on 1/9/12.
Nobody is saying for certain that Lee or Mett would've won that game, but damn, they didn't even get a chance. That's what's lingering.
Posted on 9/13/16 at 1:28 pm to Mayhawman
Says Les, that's not a trustworthy source.
Back to top


0




