- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Does anyone know if the original 2pt playcall
Posted on 11/7/22 at 6:14 am
Posted on 11/7/22 at 6:14 am
Was the same play AFTER Saban called the timeout? Or did they change the play after timeout was called and have a new formation?
12
Posted on 11/7/22 at 6:15 am to Tiger_n_ATL
They were in the same formation before and after the timeout.
Posted on 11/7/22 at 6:17 am to FreddieMac
And they still beat dat arse
Posted on 11/7/22 at 6:17 am to Tiger_n_ATL
Yea, they were lined up the same. That play was good no matter who they put on the field. It got JD out of the pocket with multiple options.
Posted on 11/7/22 at 6:18 am to Tiger_n_ATL
quote:
AFTER Saban called the timeout
And they still came out with 12 men on the field.
And Satan was 0 for 2 on 2PCs
This post was edited on 11/7/22 at 6:19 am
Posted on 11/7/22 at 6:21 am to Honkus
Man i was wishing we would have hiked the ball with Bama having 12 on the field.
Posted on 11/7/22 at 6:24 am to Tiger_n_ATL
Looks like Kelly had his play call and he was gonna stick with it, no matter what.
Posted on 11/7/22 at 6:27 am to FreddieMac
quote:
They were in the same formation before and after the timeout.
While they were in the same set they were not in the same formation. Wrs we’re spread out farther after timeout. They were bunched close to line before.
I think it was the same call but coaches adjusted the formation from something they saw before timeout.
Posted on 11/7/22 at 6:28 am to Tiger_n_ATL
Listening to BK he said one of the reasons they went for two is because they had a call they wanted to run. A play that had not been run yet that night and something Bama had not seen. I can't imagine he would decide to go for two based on that call then let Denbrock change the call in the TO.
Posted on 11/7/22 at 6:38 am to LSUfan4444
The variations of that play were run earlier in the game and they worked. That is a lethal play going forward.
The only plays that didn’t work were the WR screens in the 1st half. The 2nd and 3rd attempts put us behind the chains on 2consecutive drives (2nd downs). I’m glad we scrapped those after the mid 2Q.
The only plays that didn’t work were the WR screens in the 1st half. The 2nd and 3rd attempts put us behind the chains on 2consecutive drives (2nd downs). I’m glad we scrapped those after the mid 2Q.
Posted on 11/7/22 at 6:43 am to Big Gorilla
quote:
While they were in the same set they were not in the same formation. Wrs we’re spread out farther after timeout. They were bunched close to line before. I think it was the same call but coaches adjusted the formation from something they saw before timeout.
This. We had a bunch set closer to the LOS before the TO, but Taylor was going in motion, so likely the same play.
The more traditional formation worked well because it allowed the WRs to fire straight ahead and set their screens faster for Taylor. The other set would have made it a slightly slower developing play.
Posted on 11/7/22 at 6:48 am to Tiger_n_ATL
The formation was different. The two WRs were tighter before the TO. Unless told we don’t know if the play was changed.
Posted on 11/7/22 at 7:03 am to Tiger_n_ATL
I was there and remember certain players being on the field for the first formation, but not on field for the second
Posted on 11/7/22 at 7:05 am to Tiger_n_ATL
We did caught Bama D off guard; they didn’t know what to do atm. CBK is a genius!!!
Posted on 11/7/22 at 7:08 am to WylieTiger
It was basically the sane okay ND ran against FSU a few years ago. ND got called for offensive PI.
Posted on 11/7/22 at 7:11 am to Big Gorilla
quote:I think they were guessing, with plenty of evidence from the alignment, that it was man coverage. Was confirmed by Taylors motion.
While they were in the same set they were not in the same formation. Wrs we’re spread out farther after timeout. They were bunched close to line before.
I think it was the same call but coaches adjusted the formation from something they saw before timeout.
So moving the WRs out was to potentially (and successfully) rub out coverage coming from the tackle box. Secondarily, IF JD had to run it put two blockers in better position to block down for JD to run behind Taylor and get to the pylon.
Posted on 11/7/22 at 7:14 am to Tiger_n_ATL
I believe that was their favorite 2 point play-call, so that's what it was always going to be. I think Kelly answered a question basically saying this.
Posted on 11/7/22 at 7:18 am to beauchristopher
It honestly surprised me who lost Bama was.
12 men on field after a timeout on the most important play of the guy is very Les Miles not Nick Saban.
12 men on field after a timeout on the most important play of the guy is very Les Miles not Nick Saban.
Posted on 11/7/22 at 7:44 am to Big Gorilla
quote:
While they were in the same set they were not in the same formation. Wrs we’re spread out farther after timeout. They were bunched close to line before. I think it was the same call but coaches adjusted the formation from something they saw before timeout.
This is likely true.
But you can see Taylor going in motion right before Saban gets the timeout called. It was going to be the same play. But like you said, the LSU coaches were able to get the receivers lined up exactly where they needed to be for the maximum amount of “rub”.
Page 1 of 2
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News