- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Do y'all realize how pinched the CFP committee could have been if LSU beat Florida?
Posted on 12/8/24 at 1:01 pm
Posted on 12/8/24 at 1:01 pm
The final SEC standings before the conference championship would be
1. Texas (7 - 1) 2. Tennessee (6 - 2). 3. LSU (6 - 2) 4. Georgia (6 - 2) 5. Alabama (5 - 3) 6. S Carolina (5 - 3).
I hate being the hypothetical guy, but I do not think Tennessee beats Texas in SECCC. Either way, the committee has laid a solid precedent for rewarding those who qualify for a conference championship. So Texas and Tennessee IN (as they currently are). But the log jam of LSU Georgia and Bama is intriguing, considering the committee all but put SMU in before the conference champ. This leaves one spot in CFP, and it most likely would have been UGA over BAMA, LSU, and Miami.
The committee has harped on 3 things: eye test, head-to-head, and strength of schedule. This would have really worked the hierarchy of their own rules.
UGA passes the eye test, BAMA has head-to-head, and LSU has the best wins in the strength of common opponents.
Yes, the bar was significantly lowered this year, and play around the country reflected that.
It's just amusing to me how the sky is falling for some of you, and others remain optimistic. Look, LSU isn't at the table right now, but that doesn't mean we weren't capable this season. We have the roster and coaches to be favored in games at UF and USCw. The sky may be falling if we aren't favored in those types of games in the future.
1. Texas (7 - 1) 2. Tennessee (6 - 2). 3. LSU (6 - 2) 4. Georgia (6 - 2) 5. Alabama (5 - 3) 6. S Carolina (5 - 3).
I hate being the hypothetical guy, but I do not think Tennessee beats Texas in SECCC. Either way, the committee has laid a solid precedent for rewarding those who qualify for a conference championship. So Texas and Tennessee IN (as they currently are). But the log jam of LSU Georgia and Bama is intriguing, considering the committee all but put SMU in before the conference champ. This leaves one spot in CFP, and it most likely would have been UGA over BAMA, LSU, and Miami.
The committee has harped on 3 things: eye test, head-to-head, and strength of schedule. This would have really worked the hierarchy of their own rules.
UGA passes the eye test, BAMA has head-to-head, and LSU has the best wins in the strength of common opponents.
Yes, the bar was significantly lowered this year, and play around the country reflected that.
It's just amusing to me how the sky is falling for some of you, and others remain optimistic. Look, LSU isn't at the table right now, but that doesn't mean we weren't capable this season. We have the roster and coaches to be favored in games at UF and USCw. The sky may be falling if we aren't favored in those types of games in the future.
Posted on 12/8/24 at 1:36 pm to Settlement Alliance
I though LSU would've been in the SECCG if we'd beaten UF. Is that not the case?
Posted on 12/8/24 at 1:38 pm to Settlement Alliance
quote:the sky isn’t falling, but we didn’t even finish ranked. That’s straight up unacceptable
It's just amusing to me how the sky is falling for some of you, and others remain optimistic.

Posted on 12/8/24 at 1:38 pm to Settlement Alliance
Well none of the 3 loss SEC teams got in so I don’t think adding another would have changed things for them this year.
Posted on 12/8/24 at 1:38 pm to LSUAce007
Yes they would have. Everything they needed to happen, happened.
Posted on 12/8/24 at 1:47 pm to crownNbull
quote:
Yes they would have. Everything they needed to happen, happened.
Pretty sure Tennessee would have been in SEC Championship over LSU because Mizzou beat Arkansas.
Posted on 12/8/24 at 1:54 pm to John Casey
I think that only mattered until Alabama lost to Oklahoma
Posted on 12/8/24 at 1:58 pm to trux83LSU
According to the SEC Standings Calculator, if the LSU-UF game is changed to LSU win, Tennessee finishes 2nd and LSU 3rd.
Posted on 12/8/24 at 2:03 pm to Settlement Alliance
quote:
It's just amusing to me how the sky is falling for some of you, and others remain optimistic. Look, LSU isn't at the table right now, but that doesn't mean we weren't capable this season
We didn’t even finish ranked this season lol
Posted on 12/8/24 at 2:09 pm to TackySweater
And people will hype up this team. It's a trash season.
Posted on 12/8/24 at 2:13 pm to Settlement Alliance
Nope. If LSU wins vs UF then they are in SECCG over Tenn/Bama/UGA
Posted on 12/8/24 at 2:18 pm to John Casey
Bad coaching cost us 4 losses. LSU could easily have been 10/2.
Posted on 12/8/24 at 2:21 pm to Settlement Alliance
You do realize Heupel is in year 3 as well and is in CFP, meanwhile LSU sitting at home waiting on a scrap bowl
Posted on 12/8/24 at 2:26 pm to John Casey
quote:
Pretty sure Tennessee would have been in SEC Championship over LSU because Mizzou beat Arkansas.
Tennessee would have been because they beat Bama and Georgia and LSU lost to them.
Posted on 12/8/24 at 2:41 pm to MikeTheTiger71
quote:
Tennessee would have been because they beat Bama and Georgia and LSU lost to them.
Tenn lost to Uga
Posted on 12/8/24 at 2:44 pm to GillGo37
quote:
Tenn lost to Uga
That wouldn’t have mattered because LSU didn’t play either team. The head-to-head tiebreaker only applies if all tied teams played each other. It would have gone next to the common opponent record, which favored Tennessee because of Alabama.
Posted on 12/8/24 at 2:46 pm to tjtiger9
quote:
You do realize Heupel is in year 3 as well and is in CFP, meanwhile LSU sitting at home waiting on a scrap bowl
And last year Tennessee was in the same position LSU is this year. Believe it or not, programs actually have up and down years.
Posted on 12/8/24 at 2:57 pm to MikeTheTiger71
But that was year 2, not 3. Generally you judge the coaching based on year 3 when they are able to establish their system with their recruits and their people.
Posted on 12/8/24 at 3:19 pm to tjtiger9
Heupel hired 1/27/21 (4)
Kelly hired 11/30/21 (3)
Kelly hired 11/30/21 (3)
Posted on 12/8/24 at 4:21 pm to tjtiger9
quote:
But that was year 2, not 3. Generally you judge the coaching based on year 3 when they are able to establish their system with their recruits and their people.
Like Saban when he went 8-5? There’s nothing magical about Year 3.
Popular
Back to top
