- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Do we really have no offensive solution for a 3-man rush?
Posted on 9/28/25 at 7:33 am
Posted on 9/28/25 at 7:33 am
As bad as our line is, how could we not dial up plays to run on that? I imagine Nuss could have rolled out and taken off on many of those? Why did we just keep forcing throws into that level of coverage? I’m so confused.
Posted on 9/28/25 at 7:35 am to Addison Tiger
quote:
As bad as our line is, how could we not dial up plays to run on that?
How many a defense rushes the passer with has nothing to do with how hard it is to run on them. They could have 8 in the box and only rush three.
Posted on 9/28/25 at 7:36 am to Addison Tiger
We needed to bring a 6th man in to help block
Posted on 9/28/25 at 7:49 am to Addison Tiger
quote:
As bad as our line is, how could we not dial up plays to run on that? I imagine Nuss could have rolled out and taken off on many of those? Why did we just keep forcing throws into that level of coverage? I’m so confused.
If MVB was the QB, then he would have made OM pay for that three man front. He would have run on it all night and made them change their defense.
Posted on 9/28/25 at 8:19 am to Penrod
quote:
How many a defense rushes the passer with has nothing to do with how hard it is to run on them. They could have 8 in the box and only rush three.
In those cases, couldn't we go 5 wide with a dump off routes if they send guys, delay a draw, or have a QB who will run when the guys in the box bail, or run some jet sweeps (just not to the short side of the field)?
Posted on 9/28/25 at 8:27 am to Addison Tiger
Not with the idiot we have running our offense. And the bigger idiot that put him there.
Posted on 9/28/25 at 8:28 am to Addison Tiger
We honestly should have tried Van Buren just to give them a different look. A running qb would have kept them honest
Posted on 9/28/25 at 8:29 am to Addison Tiger
Nope. O line is BK. SOFT.
Posted on 9/28/25 at 8:32 am to heatwave
Heatwave; we did, the RB stayed in several times and we still could not protect Nuss. Bad line play, bad scheme, bad play calls, bad QB decisions and bad execution.
All that bad and the coaches could not find a solution.
All that bad and the coaches could not find a solution.
Posted on 9/28/25 at 8:33 am to Addison Tiger
Time to hand over the keys to Atkins. The lack of a running game vs a 3 man front was criminal
Posted on 9/28/25 at 9:13 am to mdomingue
quote:
In those cases, couldn't we go 5 wide with a dump off routes if they send guys, delay a draw, or have a QB who will run when the guys in the box bail, or run some jet sweeps (just not to the short side of the field)?
1. 5 wide will work against an 8 man zone if the QB has enough time. Ours doesn’t
2. They are not sending guys because they are getting there with a three man rush.
3. Our QB can’t run.
4. We could run jet sweeps. Maybe they’d work. But the one thing we are already having success with is the flare to the WR getting to the outside. It’s like a jet sweeps with a long handoff.
I’ve been watching football for almost 60 years, and I’ve never seen a scheme work when your offensive line is being dominated by three linemen. Maybe Mike Leach’s Air Raid would give you a chance?
Posted on 9/28/25 at 9:14 am to Penrod
them getting pressure and disrupting our Mickey Mouse offense with 3 rushers was more embarrassing than when Les kneeled the ball with 3 minutes left.
Posted on 9/28/25 at 9:16 am to Addison Tiger
quote:
I imagine Nuss could have rolled out and taken off on many of those
That’s why Nuss is bad for this offense, he won’t run
A qb with even just a threat to run, would have forced Ole Miss to abandon that 3 man rush strategy and given us a much better chance.
The 2023 line was not very good but JD made up for it. Nuss can’t and that’s why he should sit
Posted on 9/28/25 at 9:24 am to Penrod
Nice breakdown on it - the simple truth is that any run capable QB would have torched that defense last night. Every other team that has played them did it with even a minimally running QB. Two designed QB draw plays early on for 8-10 yards would have changed the whole defensive game plan.
Posted on 9/28/25 at 12:59 pm to Bedtiger
I was just doing a joke like we needed to double team everybody to be able to block
Posted on 9/28/25 at 2:02 pm to Addison Tiger
Yesterday, there is no reason why Adams takes the end on his side one on one and the other 4 double the other 2 DL. That was pathetic. Sloan and Davis need to go.
Popular
Back to top
9







