- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Did Alabama outplay LSU ? Every Bama fan I talk to says this.
Posted on 11/10/11 at 8:56 am to bpope
Posted on 11/10/11 at 8:56 am to bpope
While LSU's defense and special teams certainly deserve most of the credit for the win, one thing worth mentioning about the offense is that LSU managed to rush for 148 yards against Alabama when the Tide were allowing an average of only 45 yards per game. As for the outstanding defensive performance, something worth mentioning that I wasn't aware of until last night is that once Alabama was inside the 30-yard-line, they gained a total of minus 17 yards.
Yes they out played LSU......

Yes they out played LSU......
Posted on 11/10/11 at 8:57 am to TigerstuckinMS
quote:It's not stupid if he makes it. He would have been a hero then. Hindsight makes it look like a stupid decision but Saban probably felt with our ferocious defense this would be his only opportunity to try to get points, and he went for it. It's a gamble that didn't pay off.
if your kicker is unable to make the kick, it is not an opportunity. It's stupid coaching.
Posted on 11/10/11 at 8:59 am to Tiger_n_ATL
Saban has shown time and again, he is a terrible gambler. Les has shown time and again, he is a very good gambler. Queue Kenny Rogers.
Posted on 11/10/11 at 9:02 am to TN Bhoy
They are starting to sound like O'll Piss with moral victory's. Kind a sounds like Tulane when they were in the SEC. 
Posted on 11/10/11 at 9:04 am to bpope
Of course Alabama outplayed LSU on many plays during the game. The key is that LSU outplayed Alabama on most of the critical plays during the game. On the plays where LSU performed better than Alabama it is not important whether Alabama made a bad play or LSU a great play. All that matters is the results of the scoring plays. And the scoreboard is objective evidence of which team played better.
Posted on 11/10/11 at 9:06 am to Poodlebrain
quote:
Of course Alabama outplayed LSU on many plays during the game. The key is that LSU outplayed Alabama on most of the critical plays during the game. On the plays where LSU performed better than Alabama it is not important whether Alabama made a bad play or LSU a great play. All that matters is the results of the scoring plays. And the scoreboard is objective evidence of which team played better.
Finally someone who can actually think.
Posted on 11/10/11 at 9:07 am to theunknownknight
quote:
Right there, all they had to do was run the ball up the middle
Aw shite! They should of thought of that.
You're not showing much grasp of the game.
There's a reason why they would attempt the Maze play. The same reason they gained -12 yards on 17 plays from inside the 30.
Once the field shortens, the defense stiffens, and takes away the run up the middle. Safeties, corners, LBer's, all have less coverage responsibility.
Alabama was unable to move the point of attack, due to an immobile QB. We moved the ball inside their 30, and all of significant yardage, because Saban had to commit a man to cover Jefferson.
Do you remember the Auburn game in '06, before JR took his first steps beyond the LOS? We moved the ball at will b/w the 30's.
Plays don't happen b/w the 30's when you're facing elite, SEC-style defenses.
Come on, mannnn!
Posted on 11/10/11 at 9:19 am to Tiger Authority
Bama did outplay LSU. They had four missed field goals and a controversial interception at the 1 yard line. I was pulling for LSU and glad you all won the game, but Bama did indeed outplay you. With a rematch, Bama rolls (honestly not flaming).
Posted on 11/10/11 at 9:21 am to wahoocs
quote:
Once the field shortens, the defense stiffens, and takes away the run up the middle. Safeties, corners, LBer's, all have less coverage responsibility.
Anyone who watched that game and knows football could see LSU was playing conservative on defense. But when Bama got near the redzone LSU played more aggresively and made plays. Also how many yards did bama gain on busted coverages....is blowing an assignment on a play considered being outplayed? I don't think so.
Posted on 11/10/11 at 9:24 am to Tiger_n_ATL
quote:
quote:
if your kicker is unable to make the kick, it is not an opportunity. It's stupid coaching.
It's not stupid if he makes it. He would have been a hero then. Hindsight makes it look like a stupid decision but Saban probably felt with our ferocious defense this would be his only opportunity to try to get points, and he went for it. It's a gamble that didn't pay off.
Field position would have been the better call. Saban's call was a fail and he kept repeating the fail. Stupid decision when you consider their kicker sucks. It is not like Saban hand Drew on his side of the field. If that were the case then your argument might have legs.
If you can only kick the ball 46 yards and your stupid coach repeatedly ask you to try one that long or longer then that is stupid. Just throwing away field position.
Posted on 11/10/11 at 9:28 am to omegaman66
Ok new rule for just Bama and nobody else. For every 2 missed field goals, they get a free do over right after the second missed field goal.
Posted on 11/10/11 at 9:30 am to theunknownknight
I somewhat agree w/ unknownknight.
Bama's O moved the ball better but LSU moved the ball when it counted. Also, Saban's play calling screwed bama over a few times. In the end, LSU won...that's all that matters.
Bama's O moved the ball better but LSU moved the ball when it counted. Also, Saban's play calling screwed bama over a few times. In the end, LSU won...that's all that matters.
Posted on 11/10/11 at 9:37 am to Poodlebrain
There is so much stupid in this thread.
Alabama DID NOT outplay LSU. The only reason Alabama was in the game at all is because, for 3 quarters ABSOLUTELY EVERYTHING went Alabama's way, and after that, as another poster has already mentioned, LSU wore them down, took over and beat them. Here are the facts:
(1) Alabama had exactly 6 possessions prior to McCarron's interception at the very end of Q3 (at which point LSU took over). Five of those were FG attempts, one was a punt. Of the 5 FG attempts, ONLY ONE was a legit drive NOT set up by a HUGE LSU mistake. That was the first drive, and that was on the strength of JUST TWO positive plays, including one where Richardson fumbled, and Alabama got a lucky bounce!!
(2) Of the other 4 FG attempts, two were set up by Lee's unforced interceptions, and BOTH of the other two were set up by BOTH a HUGE personal foul call, AND exactly ONE big positive play (including the big 40+ yard pass).
(3) Meanwhile LSU had several sustained drives that were cut short by mistakes, or in the case of the FG, cut short by the clock with LSU kicking a FG from the 2 yard line on 3rd down.
(4) Bottom line: Without Lee's unforced interceptions, and the two big PF calls, Alabama attempts ONLY ONE FG the ENTIRE FRICKING GAME!!!!!!!!!!!!!! THAT IS NOT OUTPLAYING!!!!!!!!!
Alabama DID NOT outplay LSU. The only reason Alabama was in the game at all is because, for 3 quarters ABSOLUTELY EVERYTHING went Alabama's way, and after that, as another poster has already mentioned, LSU wore them down, took over and beat them. Here are the facts:
(1) Alabama had exactly 6 possessions prior to McCarron's interception at the very end of Q3 (at which point LSU took over). Five of those were FG attempts, one was a punt. Of the 5 FG attempts, ONLY ONE was a legit drive NOT set up by a HUGE LSU mistake. That was the first drive, and that was on the strength of JUST TWO positive plays, including one where Richardson fumbled, and Alabama got a lucky bounce!!
(2) Of the other 4 FG attempts, two were set up by Lee's unforced interceptions, and BOTH of the other two were set up by BOTH a HUGE personal foul call, AND exactly ONE big positive play (including the big 40+ yard pass).
(3) Meanwhile LSU had several sustained drives that were cut short by mistakes, or in the case of the FG, cut short by the clock with LSU kicking a FG from the 2 yard line on 3rd down.
(4) Bottom line: Without Lee's unforced interceptions, and the two big PF calls, Alabama attempts ONLY ONE FG the ENTIRE FRICKING GAME!!!!!!!!!!!!!! THAT IS NOT OUTPLAYING!!!!!!!!!
Posted on 11/10/11 at 9:40 am to bpope
out·play (out-pl)
tr.v. out·played, out·play·ing, out·plays
To surpass (an opponent) in skill or technique or in scoring points.
Nope sorry.
tr.v. out·played, out·play·ing, out·plays
To surpass (an opponent) in skill or technique or in scoring points.
Nope sorry.
Posted on 11/10/11 at 9:41 am to TDlurker
quote:
(4) Bottom line: Without Lee's unforced interceptions, and the two big PF calls, Alabama attempts ONLY ONE FG the ENTIRE FRICKING GAME!!!!!!!!!!!!!! THAT IS NOT OUTPLAYING!!!!!!!!!
This is why I can't stand the Rant. People can't reason past their own noses.
Lee plays for LSU genius. And the last time I checked, no one forced Saban to call the Maze pass to the one yard line. And AJ had another interception himself. You remove all interceptions and BAMA might have the advantage bc the LSU INT might have prevented a BAMA touchdown.
This post was edited on 11/10/11 at 9:43 am
Posted on 11/10/11 at 9:42 am to TDlurker
quote:
Lee's unforced interceptions
quote:
ONE big positive play (including the big 40+ yard pass).
quote:
everal sustained drives that were cut short by mistakes
I love the purple and gold spin on the facts
Posted on 11/10/11 at 9:43 am to Tiger_n_ATL
quote:
Saban probably felt with our ferocious defense this would be his only opportunity to try to get points
In the first half?? In the first quarter?? With a merely above-average kicker, from the edge of his range, into a breeze? What do you think Miles would have done (if he had the 'Bama FG kicker) against an equally (or more) ferocious defense? Seems pretty clear that he would have had his punter try to stick it on the 3-yard line and play field position. Maybe not late in the 4th. But in the 1st or 2nd? Close to a no-brainer.
Posted on 11/10/11 at 9:43 am to theunknownknight
quote:
Most likely, the way they were running on us on that drive, they would have scored a TD just keeping the ball on the ground.
Based on what, richardson's 5 good carries or the other 18 for 15 yards
Or maybe it was the fact that they ran 17 plays inside the 30 for -12 total yards. That's a pretty good indication they are going to score. God what a moron go take another mirror pic and post on the OT.
Popular
Back to top


0




