Started By
Message

re: Damn. People really bought into that 5 second video that his attorney released lmao

Posted on 10/8/25 at 8:09 am to
Posted by ApexTiger
cary nc
Member since Oct 2003
56550 posts
Posted on 10/8/25 at 8:09 am to
quote:

On the stand where? They can't have a GJ for a dead man.


I would think with all this attention, this case is going to court...

the family of the dead person is going to sue, the insurance companies involved are going to sue, the lady is going to be sued...

the Lacey family is coming after somebody because their son is dead, so I would imagine this gold truck driver at the very least is going to have to put his testimony on video tape under oath.
Posted by XbengalTiger
New Bama Standard...4 Losses.
Member since Oct 2003
5609 posts
Posted on 10/8/25 at 8:57 am to
quote:

The oncoming charger caused a truck to slam on it's brakes which caused the Kia to swerve into oncoming traffic
Only the driver of the truck said he DID NOT slam on his brakes and the Kia Driver was speeding behind him and she was the cause of the accident as she swerved into the other lane to avoid hitting his truck. LSP provided the statement that said the truck slammed on his brakes and the witness driving the truck REFUSED to sign the statement. LSP didn't use the statement provided by the witness driving the truck.

This entire narrative to blame the green charger was started by the man driving the tractor trailer that got pissed when Lacey passed him in a no passing area. This is obvious to see for anyone who has seen all the witness statements. The LSP jumped on this one statement that was proven false by all the video released this week and crafted a story that is also proving false.
Posted by XbengalTiger
New Bama Standard...4 Losses.
Member since Oct 2003
5609 posts
Posted on 10/8/25 at 9:20 am to
quote:

ApexTiger
You must work for LSP. Everything you are saying is fake news. The gold truck did NOT break or swerve out of his lane. Also, Lacey was back in his lane 92 yards in front of the gold truck. The video that LSP released has narration that contradicts what you are seeing with your own eyes. Why do you think the state AG is getting involved. The whole thing was a crafted story based on lies and manipulated witness statements.

The woman in the Kia behind the gold truck was also speeding +20 (same as Lacey) and eating (distracted driving) and swerved into traffic to avoid hitting the gold truck that was driving the speed limit in front of her.
Posted by Red Stick Tigress
Tiger Stadium
Member since Nov 2005
20826 posts
Posted on 10/8/25 at 10:39 am to
quote:

Lacey


Lacy.
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
63030 posts
Posted on 10/8/25 at 10:42 am to
quote:

You must work for LSP. Everything you are saying is fake news. The gold truck did NOT break or swerve out of his lane.


This is 100% false.
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
52193 posts
Posted on 10/8/25 at 11:27 am to
quote:

I’ve read your arguments and fully understand them. However, just playing devils advocate: Is LSP civilly liable for Lacy’s death? Following your logic(which I don’t disagree with, necessarily), had the LSP not overcharged him, he likely wouldn’t have killed himself.


Don’t be fricking dumb. Seriously man. Just don’t be fricking dumb.
This post was edited on 10/8/25 at 11:28 am
Posted by JPLSU1981
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2005
28424 posts
Posted on 10/8/25 at 11:38 am to
quote:

the Lacey family is coming after somebody because their son is dead


You’re probably right. But based on everything I see, they really don’t have a case IMO. I don’t think that lawsuit will go very far.
Posted by Triple Bogey
19th Green
Member since May 2017
6802 posts
Posted on 10/8/25 at 11:40 am to
quote:

and bad decision making by Lacy to speed in the wrong lane and to flee the scene.


This is why I think he got bigger charges. Dumb accident and bad driving by at least 2, if not 3 different drivers. But if he stays and at least tries to help and gives a statement, I don't think we are even discussing this.

Also let this be a lesson to the kids out there. Speeding doesn't save you any real amount of time. And don't drive cars/trucks that stand out.
Posted by Higgysmalls
Ft Lauderdale
Member since Jun 2016
7956 posts
Posted on 10/8/25 at 11:51 am to
quote:


I don’t think you can hold people responsible for how poorly others react to things.


I'm dumber just for reading this line
Posted by Nelson Biederman IV
New York, NY
Member since Apr 2014
628 posts
Posted on 10/8/25 at 12:06 pm to
quote:

I'm dumber just for reading this line


How so? I’m just following RB10’s reasoning, since apparently we’re dealing in absolutes. If you can hold people responsible for how others react to their actions, and as RB10 has said, the charges would have been plead down or reduced; then the LSP over charged and are therefore responsible for his death. I don’t think that’s true, but that’s the logic. For the record, I don’t think the LSP is liable, Lacy should have been cited for reckless operation, and the woman was at fault. If you disagree with that assertion, please address the squirrel scenario.
Posted by zuluboudreaux
God’s country USA
Member since Jan 2008
1173 posts
Posted on 10/8/25 at 12:08 pm to
The gold truck did NOT break or swerve out of his lane.
It did brake and it did exit the roadway to the right. This is undisputed except by you evidently.

Also, Lacey was back in his lane 92 yards in front of the gold truck.
Relevant in everyone is still. With 2 vehicles, green charger speeding in the wrong lane and the gold truck traveling in the same lane in the opposite direction, 92 yards / 276 feet is a situation that has an impact within seconds.

The video that LSP released has narration that contradicts what you are seeing with your own eyes.
Plain & simple to see the green charger driving fast in the wrong lane of travel, then suddenly braking hard and then sliding over to the correct lane of travel. See gold truck veer to the right shoulder in apparent response to oncoming head on collision with the green charger. As a result of this, other vehicle behind gold truck, takes an action of entering the opposing lane and colliding with the brown vehicle.

Why do you think the state AG is getting involved.
Because she has released a statement on the incident and a review in progress.

The whole thing was a crafted story based on lies and manipulated witness statements.
The whole thing? Really? Witnesses immediately approached the Trooper and implicated the green charger as the cause of the crash. So you are saying it was all a total conspiracy with the intent to harm Kyren Lacy?

The woman in the Kia behind the gold truck was also speeding +20 (same as Lacey)
No not speeding (+20) like you state the green charger was doing,
she was doing 49.6 in a 45mph zone according to the Ory data.

and eating (distracted driving) and swerved into traffic to avoid hitting the gold truck that was driving the speed limit in front of her.
Eating / Possibly distracted - we can agree on that.

Gold truck driving the speed limit - No he was slowing and exiting the roadway to the right - which was under the speed limit according to Ory data.
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
52193 posts
Posted on 10/8/25 at 12:15 pm to
quote:

Also, Lacey was back in his lane 92 yards in front of the gold truck. Relevant in everyone is still. With 2 vehicles, green charger speeding in the wrong lane and the gold truck traveling in the same lane in the opposite direction, 92 yards / 276 feet is a situation that has an impact within seconds.


Calculation for time before objects traveling opposite directions meet:

Time = Distance/Velocity 1 + Velocity 2

Time = 92/70+30

Time = .92

Roughly .92 seconds before Lacy and the gold truck would collided head on.
This post was edited on 10/8/25 at 12:20 pm
Posted by Grinder
Member since Nov 2007
2685 posts
Posted on 10/8/25 at 12:28 pm to
There are some people in this thread trying hard for Lacy to be declared innocent.

I hope none of you are ever on a jury. The video evidence is pretty clear about the events that took place that day.

And Lacy’s family will be laughed out of court if they try to sue someone to make a buck on this accident.
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
52193 posts
Posted on 10/8/25 at 12:30 pm to
quote:

How so? I’m just following RB10’s reasoning, since apparently we’re dealing in absolutes. If you can hold people responsible for how others react to their actions, and as RB10 has said, the charges would have been plead down or reduced; then the LSP over charged and are therefore responsible for his death. I don’t think that’s true, but that’s the logic. For the record, I don’t think the LSP is liable, Lacy should have been cited for reckless operation, and the woman was at fault. If you disagree with that assertion, please address the squirrel scenario.


No one is holding Lacy responsible for the woman’s actions. He’s being held responsible for his own actions that triggered a wreck.

It’s also not another’s fault that he killed himself. He made that choice. Just like he made a choice to drive like an a-hole. The lady didn’t choose to make a defensive driving maneuver, she’s was forced into that situation by Lacy’s actions.

Like I said. Please, try not to be a fricking moron and stop trying to blame anyone but Lacy for his shitty actions.
This post was edited on 10/8/25 at 12:39 pm
Posted by Zippydog
metairie , La
Member since Jan 2020
1149 posts
Posted on 10/8/25 at 12:30 pm to
Lacy initiated the accident by driving extremely aggressively in the wrong lane way over the speed limit , passing 2 cars and an 18 wheeler, in a no passing zone , mind you .
Lacy had to brake hard to get back in his lane . The truck driver slowed or swerved to avoid Lacy . The woman behind the truck may be at fault for following too closely . But ,
really … who got the party started ? Who left the scene of an accident and called a criminal defense attorney ?
Posted by Lige
Member since Nov 2015
2086 posts
Posted on 10/8/25 at 1:39 pm to
I posted this earlier .

I agree with your take and I don’t think Lacy’s actions were the main reason for the collision. I think that the charges would have been thrown out or reduced for sure. I do wonder if every person charged with a crime, legit or not, that goes off the deep end are we gonna hold law enforcement liable. His defense team should have stressed to him to hang in there. I do think social media beating up on the kid was a major factor.
Posted by PurpNGold1985
Member since Mar 2025
622 posts
Posted on 10/8/25 at 1:55 pm to
Nobody and no situation can CAUSE another human to off themselves. It’s a personal choice made of their own free will and volition. Nobody is liable for that. If so, you could sue someone for bullying someone and they take their life. That’s not a thing. It’s wrong, but it’s not something that another party can be found liable for.
Posted by Nelson Biederman IV
New York, NY
Member since Apr 2014
628 posts
Posted on 10/8/25 at 2:28 pm to
quote:

Please, try not to be a fricking moron


Look, I’m not insulting your intelligence. I am, however, trying to illustrate how obtuse you are being and how rigid your application of reason is on this matter. I am not absolving Lacy of any guilt. I am talking about the application of the law and reason. Again, I’ll ask you to answer the squirrel scenario. You don’t seem to be looking at this very objectively.
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 9 of 9Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram