- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Could you Tigers live with this schedule model???
Posted on 7/30/21 at 11:00 pm to G&P
Posted on 7/30/21 at 11:00 pm to G&P
To be honest, I would want to have the strongest schedule as possible each year. I know a lot of fans want to have as many several "gimmie wins", but I want to see us play Bama, Florida, UGA, Auburn, Oklahoma, A&M.. and Texas, Arkansas & Ole Miss..If we can get the first 6 games I listed that would be good and if they have to be rotated, I'd like to see the last 3 I mentioned thrown in..
Posted on 7/31/21 at 9:13 am to G&P
I don’t like that we don’t get to play Ole Miss, Florida, Auburn, or Alabama. I could take losing 2 of those games, but not all 4.
Posted on 7/31/21 at 9:47 am to G&P
A & C are the Varsity pods.
B & D are the Junior Varsity pods.
B & D are the Junior Varsity pods.
Posted on 7/31/21 at 10:08 am to G&P
Pod C is brutal.
Pods B and D are pillow fights. At least that would give Tennessee a chance to get back on their feet.
Posted on 7/31/21 at 10:29 am to G&P
the only pods that make sense:
A: OU UT Arky Mizzou
B: LSU Aggie Ole Miss MSU
c: Auburn Bama Tenn Vandy
D: Florida Georgia SC Kentucky
A: OU UT Arky Mizzou
B: LSU Aggie Ole Miss MSU
c: Auburn Bama Tenn Vandy
D: Florida Georgia SC Kentucky
Posted on 7/31/21 at 10:32 am to G&P
quote:
Imbalance schedules create animosity.
Your pods create schedule imbalances
Posted on 7/31/21 at 12:34 pm to KingofthePoint
Thinking this is the setup ESPN/Sankey will want.
Makes perfect sense for their purposes. $$$
Makes perfect sense for their purposes. $$$
Posted on 7/31/21 at 12:41 pm to G&P
If they do the pod approach from a competitive standpoint and a traditional rival standpoint, it just makes a ton of sense to do:
Pod1: Ok, UT, Ark, Missouri
Pod2: TAMU, LSU, MSU, OM
Pod3: Bama, Aub, Tenn, SC
Pod4: UGA, UF, Vandy, UK
Each group has 2 perennial powers and it is reasonable grouped by area.
Specifically for LSU, I’d want my every year opponent from other pods to be Bama and Aub. Ark really does nothing for me and the “Boot” rivalry always just seemed forced.
I’d miss playing UF but I still would much prefer Bama and Aub over UF
Pod1: Ok, UT, Ark, Missouri
Pod2: TAMU, LSU, MSU, OM
Pod3: Bama, Aub, Tenn, SC
Pod4: UGA, UF, Vandy, UK
Each group has 2 perennial powers and it is reasonable grouped by area.
Specifically for LSU, I’d want my every year opponent from other pods to be Bama and Aub. Ark really does nothing for me and the “Boot” rivalry always just seemed forced.
I’d miss playing UF but I still would much prefer Bama and Aub over UF
This post was edited on 7/31/21 at 12:53 pm
Posted on 7/31/21 at 12:45 pm to STEVED00
Perennial power feels strong for A&M but I get what you mean
Posted on 7/31/21 at 12:54 pm to wildtigercat93
On second thought, I would swap SC and Uk
Posted on 7/31/21 at 1:02 pm to STEVED00
It’s not about pod balance.
Posted on 7/31/21 at 1:38 pm to G&P
So pods A&C will play for the championship every year?
Or will those pods beat up on each other while the weaker pods might have a more dominant team and squeak in with a better record
Or will those pods beat up on each other while the weaker pods might have a more dominant team and squeak in with a better record
Posted on 7/31/21 at 1:55 pm to fr33manator
quote:
Or will those pods beat up on each other while the weaker pods might have a more dominant team and squeak in with a better record
How many games are we talking about inside each pod? 3 correct.
It's still a nine game SEC schedule. Maybe a 7-2 team makes it to the Championship game, but that team would still have to win 7 SEC games. Right?
Posted on 7/31/21 at 3:06 pm to G&P
Just an East and a West division done geovraphically will work
Posted on 7/31/21 at 3:38 pm to G&P
Somebody is smoking crack! No way the SEC approves those Pods LOL!! Most likely they stay with East division / West divisions. Rotating 2 other oppo divisions teams. 
This post was edited on 7/31/21 at 3:43 pm
Posted on 7/31/21 at 4:08 pm to G&P
I am one of your three upvotes.
Posted on 7/31/21 at 4:09 pm to G&P
Pod A and C are way better than B and D lol
Posted on 7/31/21 at 4:14 pm to St Jean The Baptiste
quote:
I am one of your three upvotes.
Super-duper!
Posted on 7/31/21 at 8:39 pm to Big4SALTbro
quote:
Pod A and C are way better than B and D lol
By design - hard / easy.
Popular
Back to top


0






