- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Coach O expects Pelini to move to a 4-3 “attacking” defense
Posted on 2/5/20 at 3:18 pm
Posted on 2/5/20 at 3:18 pm
quote:
Orgeron says the defense is shifting to a 4-3 "attack style defense" under Bo Pelini. "He's going to put them in the best position to attack. I expect us to get more sacks and more tackles for loss because of his defense."
Cody Worsham Twitter
22
Posted on 2/5/20 at 3:21 pm to LSUTigers_00
This is my preference. Aranda is a GREAT DC and a brilliant mind but I can't say I am as much a fan of his schemes.
Posted on 2/5/20 at 3:23 pm to LSUTigers_00
Guess we will see. I’ve personally liked the 3-4.
Posted on 2/5/20 at 3:26 pm to Fun Bunch
Coverage scheme wise aranda is the best..never really seen alot of blown assignments or guys out of place in his defense...blitz wise aranda was so so..he could have if he wanted to but aranda likes to play numbers against yards
Posted on 2/5/20 at 3:30 pm to LSUTigers_00
I like the attacking style defense
Posted on 2/5/20 at 3:32 pm to cas4t
I like 3-4 too. Better against the spread
Posted on 2/5/20 at 3:33 pm to Lester Earl
I think we see a more 4-2-5 base look than traditional 4-3, which should be fine against the spread.
Posted on 2/5/20 at 3:35 pm to LSUTigers_00
Can’t wait very excited about this.
Posted on 2/5/20 at 3:37 pm to LSUTigers_00
This is the same statement that Every DC hire ever has had
Posted on 2/5/20 at 3:38 pm to LSUTigers_00
We thin at LB for 2020...moving to a 43 should help
Posted on 2/5/20 at 3:38 pm to cas4t
quote:
Guess we will see. I’ve personally liked the 3-4.
One slightly down year and people act like Aranda wasn't the fricking truth.... YOU WANNA KNOW WHO ALSO RUNS A 4-3.... God Damn Kevin Steele. Do we have that short of a memory? We were horrible under him in the 4-3.... and you have to love recruiting and building kids for one scheme.. just to change it now. Say goodbye to players like Marcel Brooks and Divinity rushing the passer. They are far too small to rush the passer in a 4-3.
Steele's 4-3 has only been good because he had the best D line in the nation. we don't have Brown and Davidson.. and we definitely don't have the talent on D line we had back in the mid 2000s. we are about to lose A TON of athleticism at edge. you guys wonder why we have been so great at stopping running QBs the past few years...
This post was edited on 2/5/20 at 3:41 pm
Posted on 2/5/20 at 3:39 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
I like 3-4 too. Better against the spread
Yea in base but how much do we run base.
For the last 4 games Chaisson was on the line a lot and we pretty much have 2 hybrid players in Brooks and Stevens that give a lot of versatility
Ohio St and Clemson run a 4-3 with lighter DEs than what old school 4-3s used
Posted on 2/5/20 at 3:39 pm to LSUTigers_00
Would prefer a 3-4
Posted on 2/5/20 at 3:43 pm to SoFunnyItsNot
quote:
Say goodbye to players like Marcel Brooks and Divinity rushing the passer.
You are trying to pigeon hole scheme way too much
Clemson's base is a 4-3 and Isiah Simmons (who is very similar to Brooks and Stevens) and that white LB were rushing the passer the whole NC game
Auburn had big cat bryant who is essentially the same player as Chaisson at DE
Posted on 2/5/20 at 3:44 pm to deaux
Well definitely be in more 4-2-5 than base 4-3 but I am interested in seeing what we do DL wise. We could easily run a 4-3
I don’t remember much about the pure Xs and Os of pelini’s 4-3.
I don’t remember much about the pure Xs and Os of pelini’s 4-3.
Posted on 2/5/20 at 3:46 pm to Midtiger farm
quote:
Yea in base but how much do we run base.
Under Aranda not much
But if they are talking about being able to attack more cause of 4 DL, you’d have to think that’s the plan. It won’t so much be a base defense but I’d guess 4 DL most of the time with back end variables
I’m sure it will be fine. Just prefer 3-4
Posted on 2/5/20 at 3:47 pm to LSUTigers_00
With the debate and disagreement between 3-4 and 4-3, why not split the difference and run a 3.5 - 3.5?
Posted on 2/5/20 at 3:48 pm to SoFunnyItsNot
quote:
Say goodbye to players like Marcel Brooks and Divinity rushing the passer. They are far too small to rush the passer in a 4-3.
Yea, that’s just false
Brooks especially, was basically a blitzer they put up near the line. That fits in any scheme. It’s not like he put his hand in the dirt
Posted on 2/5/20 at 3:49 pm to Midtiger farm
quote:
You are trying to pigeon hole scheme way too much Clemson's base is a 4-3 and Isiah Simmons (who is very similar to Brooks and Stevens) and that white LB were rushing the passer the whole NC game
Bro WHAT... Isaiah Simmons is 6'4 23.... Marcel Brooks is 6'2 194... you CANNOT play 4-3 end at that size. people would run the ball right down our throats... He is able to rush the passer in a 3-4 because you have 3 big guys eating blocks and stuffing the run. this isn't incredibly difficult stuff to understand...
Most 3-4 outside rushers ONLY rush the passer. will sometimes make a play on the ball carrier. but that's not what there are there for. Von Miller is there to attack the QB.. not tackle ball carriers for a 3 yard gain. some of you need to google 4-3 and 3-4 defenses before we start talking about them seriously.
This post was edited on 2/5/20 at 3:50 pm
Posted on 2/5/20 at 3:53 pm to SoFunnyItsNot
Relax funny man I’m sure O knows just a tad bit more about what defense to run than you do. Call me crazy but I really believe that.
Page 1 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News