- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Brooks had possession
Posted on 11/6/22 at 11:11 am
Posted on 11/6/22 at 11:11 am
18
Posted on 11/6/22 at 11:11 am to HtxDr
No he never had it while down.
This post was edited on 11/6/22 at 11:12 am
Posted on 11/6/22 at 11:11 am to HtxDr
They had this view when they reviewed it btw.
Posted on 11/6/22 at 11:11 am to HtxDr
He had 2 hands on the ball but he didn’t have possession. Total shite rule but, it was the right call.
Posted on 11/6/22 at 11:11 am to HtxDr
I agree. Two hands and control with a knee down. LSU ball
Posted on 11/6/22 at 11:12 am to FreddieMac
Patrick Peterson did too
Posted on 11/6/22 at 11:12 am to HtxDr
He didn't have possession at the moment in this picture, the ball was still moving. Absolutely awful call and complete BS but this picture is worthless, show the video.
Posted on 11/6/22 at 11:12 am to FreddieMac
quote:
No he never had it
thanks for your input Nick.
Posted on 11/6/22 at 11:12 am to HtxDr
And the finger moved on the PI call.
Posted on 11/6/22 at 11:13 am to HtxDr
If he didn’t then I don’t know wtf is going on in Destin or wherever they make up some of these idiotic rules
Posted on 11/6/22 at 11:13 am to FreddieMac
quote:
No he never had it while down.
I don't see how that matters. We were the last team to posses it when it was ruled dead.
Posted on 11/6/22 at 11:14 am to Rocko527
quote:
He had 2 hands on the ball but he didn’t have possession. Total shite rule but, it was the right call.
Please explain (seriously).
Posted on 11/6/22 at 11:16 am to Kingpenm3
quote:
Please explain (seriously).
The ball was still moving while on the ground, I'm just talking about the moment of pic in OP. I don't even personally think it's the right call, complete BS all around, but moment OP pic is showing the player did not have full possession of the ball.
Posted on 11/6/22 at 11:16 am to Kingpenm3
He had it secured in his hands with a knee on the ground when the Bama player slapped at it and it bobbled.
The subjective bullshite “degrees of possession” argument is a stupid one. You either possess it or you don’t.
The subjective bullshite “degrees of possession” argument is a stupid one. You either possess it or you don’t.
Posted on 11/6/22 at 11:16 am to Kingpenm3
quote:
Please explain (seriously).
Watch the whole play. He didn’t have possession of it before the other player was out of bounds (seriously).
Posted on 11/6/22 at 11:18 am to Rocko527
Doesn’t matter. He possessed it before said out of bounds player slapped it loose. It’s a bullshite call.
Posted on 11/6/22 at 11:19 am to HtxDr
immediately before his left knee hits the ground in that image, is when the ball touch (and move) occurs. Then while the ball was being bobbled, his knee is on the ground but, the ball touch had already occurred.
Posted on 11/6/22 at 11:21 am to HtxDr
Refs made the right call within the boundaries of the rule. Rule is shite though.
Posted on 11/6/22 at 11:22 am to Kingpenm3
quote:
I don't see how that matters. We were the last team to posses it when it was ruled dead.
It’s a loose ball until you establish possession. By rule, possession is established the same way for loose balls as it is for catches, the only difference being a loose ball is still live if it hits the ground.
The snapshots of him with two hands on the ball aren’t as meaningful as folks seem to think. I wish someone would post a gif instead.
I’m sure I could find a screenshot of a WR in the endzone with two hands on a football right before it gets knocked out.. doesn’t mean he had possession in the endzone, which is what is required for a touchdown.
The fact that he had a knee down means nothing until he completes the recovery. Just like it means nothing that a WR’s feet are in the endzone until he completes a catch.
I don’t really agree with it being overturned, but I also think they probably got the call right by the letter of the rule.
Posted on 11/6/22 at 11:23 am to Rocko527
Stupid rule. It should be changed. If you leave the field with the ball still in play, but not in your possession, you should have to reestablish yourself back in play before you touch the ball. If you don't reestablish yourself in play, it should be a penalty for an illegal touch. Your team doesn't get to maintain the ball because you touched the ball illegally.
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News