- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Brian Kelly Files Suit Against LSU
Posted on 11/11/25 at 10:29 am to LetsGeauxbb
Posted on 11/11/25 at 10:29 am to LetsGeauxbb
If lsu is making up shite about "cause" this will kill lsu football
Posted on 11/11/25 at 10:31 am to PP7 for heisman
quote:
That will potentially limit LSU's hiring opportunities.
Surely they realize this, but I guess they're too stupid to care.
We'll be lucky to get a CUSA level coach once this is all said and done.
The second that Landry got involved, we were screwed.
I think it might be time to take a break from LSU football for a while. I'll still watch other sports until such time that LSU manages to frick those up too.
Posted on 11/11/25 at 10:34 am to OceanMan
quote:
Notice of termination was required either way.
The contract called for a 7 day notice if there was intent to fire for cause. There was no requirement to give prior notification of intent to terminate without cause. You don't tell a coach that he's going to be fired after his next game.
quote:
As far as we know, Kelly is getting paid and has been given a fair settlement offer.
Unfortunately, Kelly doesn't need to accept anything other than what was agreed to in the contract. Now, he may accept less as a lump sum with no offset verbiage, but offering half while threatening to find "cause" after the fact is a bold strategy indeed.
This post was edited on 11/11/25 at 10:35 am
Posted on 11/11/25 at 10:36 am to LSBoosie
quote:
Also using this as a tactic to force BK to settle.
The issue is that there is no cause and no secret dirt that would actually provide leverage.
The man is 64. Had a rough spot with his wife and they got over it: no one cares. He coached well, just not to expectations. He was a known red faced, yelling a-hole before he was hired.
He is owed 54 million dollars. Very little they could release to provide enough"motivation" to truly affect him.
He is old enough to not have to work or coach again. He can just tune out social media.
All LSU is doing is setting themselves up for more liability in a larger lawsuit, which may be the plan to get insurance to cover/offset the expense.
Just pay the man.
Posted on 11/11/25 at 10:37 am to Red Stick Tigress
quote:Well of course they’re playing semantics with words
They're playing semantics with words. Separation with the head football coach probably means fired to 99.9% of all people with half a brain, including judges.
Brian Kelly was relieved of his job duties but still maintained his paycheck, maintained other monetary perks, etc.
Despite him being “fired”, was his employment contract officially terminated? We don’t know that.
Posted on 11/11/25 at 10:40 am to LouisianaLonghorn
quote:
That will potentially limit LSU's hiring opportunities.
In other words the next LSU coach is fricked
Posted on 11/11/25 at 10:40 am to LetsGeauxbb
Where can I find a copy of the 48 page lawsuit?
Posted on 11/11/25 at 10:43 am to JanaK306
quote:
Where can I find a copy of the 48 page lawsuit?
It is not out yet. ClerkConnect will not update until tomorrow because of the holiday. I am working angles to get a copy.
Posted on 11/11/25 at 10:43 am to Chris_topher
quote:
In other words the next LSU coach is fricked
Going from team vote to self-coached. It may work out.
Posted on 11/11/25 at 10:45 am to sharkfhin
Remember when it was said that Landry didn't like rewarding mediocrity. Sounds to me like he's not wanting LSU to fit the bill for this one even though they have the ability to do so. Maybe just negotiate how he will receive the money but just give him the damn money and move on.
Remember that it was the BOS who approved this contract. If they had issue with the buyout, they never should've accepted it. You just don't assume everything will work out and go on about your business. You hope things work out, but protect yourself financially just in case it doesn't. At this point, honor the contract and move on. But simply the fact of calling him bluff and allowing the suit to go through is crazy. Just simply allowing this makes LSU and the athletic dept look really bad yet again.
It could be that Landry doesn't think he's doing anything wrong, but again the optics look bad because well we can't get out of our own way.
Remember that it was the BOS who approved this contract. If they had issue with the buyout, they never should've accepted it. You just don't assume everything will work out and go on about your business. You hope things work out, but protect yourself financially just in case it doesn't. At this point, honor the contract and move on. But simply the fact of calling him bluff and allowing the suit to go through is crazy. Just simply allowing this makes LSU and the athletic dept look really bad yet again.
It could be that Landry doesn't think he's doing anything wrong, but again the optics look bad because well we can't get out of our own way.
Posted on 11/11/25 at 10:48 am to RanchoLaPuerto
Let us know when you get your hands on it sooner. Can’t wait to read it. Thanks!
Posted on 11/11/25 at 10:50 am to LetsGeauxbb
LSU has killed its chances of hiring a “skins on the wall” coach.
Posted on 11/11/25 at 10:50 am to Lakeboy7
quote:
Prospective coaches are watching their phone buzz when they see 225.
Agents are blocking any calls from 225 area code.
Posted on 11/11/25 at 10:54 am to sharkfhin
LSU has already offered $30M and to waive duty to mitigate, after Kelly said he is open to negotiating. They seem to be demonstrating more good faith than Kelly.
I’ve read the contract a couple times this morning. Kelly can be fired for cause for refusing to perform the duties assigned by Woodward. He can be fired for taking an unauthorized vacation. Whether this would stick in court or not, who knows, hence the negotiations.
LSU not having a President at the time of the assumed termination, and quick termination of Woodward clouds the picture quite a bit as far as timelines go.
I’ve read the contract a couple times this morning. Kelly can be fired for cause for refusing to perform the duties assigned by Woodward. He can be fired for taking an unauthorized vacation. Whether this would stick in court or not, who knows, hence the negotiations.
LSU not having a President at the time of the assumed termination, and quick termination of Woodward clouds the picture quite a bit as far as timelines go.
Posted on 11/11/25 at 10:55 am to OceanMan
quote:by default this is incorrect. His contract states such. He is owed the 54. However the clause can reduce it like your saying. If LSU is using some bs shite to get him to fold and loses, huge bad look for LSU. SMDH
They seem to be demonstrating more good faith than Kelly.
Burger King's final frick you to LSU. "Yall wanna fire me, okay ill make sure no coach wants to come here" smdh
This post was edited on 11/11/25 at 10:59 am
Posted on 11/11/25 at 10:59 am to sharkfhin
quote:
by default this is incorrect. His contract states such. He is owed the 54. However the clause can reduce it like your saying. If LSU is using some bs shite to get him to fold and loses, huge bad look for LSU. SMDH
quit being a pussy. that's a bad look.
Posted on 11/11/25 at 11:01 am to OceanMan
quote:
I’ve read the contract a couple times this morning. Kelly can be fired for cause for refusing to perform the duties assigned by Woodward. He can be fired for taking an unauthorized vacation. Whether this would stick in court or not, who knows, hence the negotiations.
They are claiming he was not given the right to cure.
It says he has a right to cure "to the extent curable" on seven days notice. So it may come down to whether the cause was "curable."
Posted on 11/11/25 at 11:01 am to Chad504boy
Im not
Im just saying if he is owed 54, get it over with, the world is watching.
If lsu has some bs shite on him that wont stick and it backfires, that will be bad for the future.
Everybody and their momma knows LSU is trying to save some money and nail him on some shite. Make's us look stupid. Everyone wanted him fired cause the team wasnt producing. End of story.
Im just saying if he is owed 54, get it over with, the world is watching.
If lsu has some bs shite on him that wont stick and it backfires, that will be bad for the future.
Everybody and their momma knows LSU is trying to save some money and nail him on some shite. Make's us look stupid. Everyone wanted him fired cause the team wasnt producing. End of story.
This post was edited on 11/11/25 at 11:04 am
Posted on 11/11/25 at 11:03 am to LetsGeauxbb
Neither party is blameless here. Kelly has said some very inconsistent things since he was relieved too. That’s why there are courts to decide civil disputes. Let it play out, LSU needs to do a professional, competent, and fair financial proposal, and we will land a quality coach.
Posted on 11/11/25 at 11:05 am to sharkfhin
quote:
Im not
Im just saying if he is owed 54, get it over with, the world is watching.
If lsu has some bs shite on him that wont stick and it backfires, that will be bad for the future.
Everybody and their momma knows LSU is trying to save some money and nail him on some shite. Make's us look stupid. Everyone wanted him fired cause the team was producing. End of story.
showed up to LSU, fricking a realtor a relative of a LSU coach... maybe fricked a staffer, drinking on the job, not being on the job, no show at meetings, golfing non stop, not being involved like you should and running the program to the caliber that you were fricking hired to do. brian kelly can frick himself and if half of any is true, he should thank us fricking writing his arse a 25 million dollar get fricked check.
Popular
Back to top


2



