- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Been out, and I’m sure this has been discussed ad nauseam, but Neal totally fubar that
Posted on 5/25/24 at 10:28 pm to drizztiger
Posted on 5/25/24 at 10:28 pm to drizztiger
quote:
Meauxjeaux Why am I not surprised at your reaction.
Because 1kneal continues to exhibit shite catching techniques and I like appreciate quality catching?
Posted on 5/25/24 at 10:30 pm to Meauxjeaux
I have a feeling Neal has practiced this exact situation, knew where to put his knee and his foot , to not touch home, to not be forward the plate . And that's exactly what happened.
This post was edited on 5/25/24 at 10:34 pm
Posted on 5/25/24 at 10:32 pm to Tigershine
The camera angle they showed on Sports Center right after the softball game shows that Neal clearly stepped in front of the plate before he caught the ball.
Posted on 5/25/24 at 10:32 pm to Choupique19
quote:
You realize that a batter is allowed to swing at a pitch, right? The batter could have knocked Neal in the back of the head and it would have been catcher's interference.
You are getting downvoted, but you are right. What Neal did is fine ONLY b/c the batter didn't swing.
Posted on 5/25/24 at 10:34 pm to gabzooks
quote:
But you got to see how others don’t care because at the end of the day he didn’t actually violate the rule the umps said he did
I do see what they’re saying. And I agree it does not violate the rule.
My point is at the highest echelon of D1 baseball we should expect better.
Look, i like the kid. I don’t like how he has regressed since the first half of his freshman season.
He’s extremely lucky he’s not in the hospital right now.
Whoever is coaching, this kid is screwing him up big-time.
Posted on 5/25/24 at 10:34 pm to LL7
quote:
The camera angle they showed on Sports Center right after the softball game shows that Neal clearly stepped in front of the plate before he caught the ball.
He stepped on the side of it. In front would imply fair territory. Neal never touched the plate and his toes might have been past the front line of the plate, but he never stepped in front of the plate.
Posted on 5/25/24 at 10:34 pm to LSUJML
quote:
his stupid trolls make me want to kick puppies
I've noticed that about him. There's a few who will take any situation, win or loss, to troll. 00 Tech Grad, Tiger Prophet are some others that immediately come to mind.
Posted on 5/25/24 at 10:39 pm to Meauxjeaux
Blame the rule, blame the umps, blame the replay review rules…. Lots of blame that will be discussed… In more important circles than here because we all watched that nonsense. A bright light was shine on it.
But blaming the catcher and the defense there is silly…… for ANYONE that has common sense.
But blaming the catcher and the defense there is silly…… for ANYONE that has common sense.
This post was edited on 5/25/24 at 10:42 pm
Posted on 5/25/24 at 10:41 pm to notbilly
quote:
What Neal did is fine ONLY b/c the batter didn't swing.
The batter COULD NOT swing because he left the batters box. Why is this simple fact so hard for many of you to get straight.
Posted on 5/25/24 at 10:43 pm to Meauxjeaux
quote:
Neil should’ve been clocked in the back of the head with 100 mile an hour swing.
Batter left the box. Would have been hard to hit the catcher as he was running away from the plate.
quote:
he stays crouched even with a stupid arse one kneel down stuff, he catches the ball puts the glove on the plate and runner is out.
This is false. Neal had to take 2 steps to be In line with the plate. Simply dropping his glove would not have done anything.
quote:
You gain absolutely zero by moving onto the plate like he did. Whether he actually touched it or went in front of it or not.
This is also false. Neal played it perfectly. He caught the ball in a perfect defensive stance to tag the runner coming home. His right foot was on the side of the plate, and his left foot was behind. It was literally textbook defensive play from the catchers position.
The umps fricked up, plain and simple. Not only did they get the balk call wrong but they awarded SC a run even though the runner never touched the plate.
Posted on 5/25/24 at 10:45 pm to purple18
quote:
But he didn’t…he stepped completely out the box before the pitch was delivered
That's not accurate. The batter has both feet in the box when Herring released the ball. See the frame below. In the second pic, the ball is cleary on it's way (near Herring's foot from this angle) and the batter still has a foot in the box.
Ump still fricked the call, but the batter was in the box when it was thrown.

Posted on 5/25/24 at 10:49 pm to saint tiger225
quote:
You idiots all want to have hot takes but you just make yourselves look stupid AF because you end up posting dumb shite like this.
Dude check his post history. Lol. It’s what he does
Posted on 5/25/24 at 10:57 pm to notbilly
quote:
the ball is cleary on it's way (near Herring's foot from this angle) and the batter still has a foot in the box.
He is also clearly moving backwards
Posted on 5/25/24 at 11:06 pm to 0
quote:
He is also clearly moving backwards
You think that’s relevant and you’re running me down about rule technicalities lol
Posted on 5/25/24 at 11:08 pm to Meauxjeaux
I think the problem here is we have a bunch of perfect game experts who think the 16-year-old pop times of 1.7 are awesome when they release the ball 8 inches in front of the plate.
Posted on 5/25/24 at 11:11 pm to Choupique19
quote:but he didn’t. So tell me why it’s inference .
realize that a batter is allowed to swing at a pitch, right? The batter could have knocked Neal in the back of the head and it would have been catcher's interference.
Posted on 5/25/24 at 11:13 pm to Meauxjeaux
And what about the batter leaving the box before the pitch was thrown?
What's the rule on that? Someone quoted a rule stating it's a strike penalty. Also with runners on it is possibly a 2 strike penalty?
What's the rule on that? Someone quoted a rule stating it's a strike penalty. Also with runners on it is possibly a 2 strike penalty?
Posted on 5/25/24 at 11:13 pm to tigerfoot
quote:
but he didn’t. So tell me why it’s inference .
I didn’t call it interference, I only said that Neal didn’t “play it perfectly” as another poster said he did.
Posted on 5/25/24 at 11:15 pm to Paddyshack
quote:
That’s correct but the batter stepped out before that which is an automatic strike. The umps ignored that altogether.
Bingo. Just like when the time ran out on the SC pitcher, Travinski went to first. That was the third strike, inning over!
Posted on 5/25/24 at 11:16 pm to Meauxjeaux
quote:better than a defense of a slow move to home w a runner on an attempted steal.
do see what they’re saying. And I agree it does not violate the rule. My point is at the highest echelon of D1 baseball we should expect better.
shite.
quote:drama much?
He’s extremely lucky he’s not in the hospital right now.
Popular
Back to top



0




