Started By
Message

re: Been out, and I’m sure this has been discussed ad nauseam, but Neal totally fubar that

Posted on 5/25/24 at 10:28 pm to
Posted by Meauxjeaux
102836 posts including my alters
Member since Jun 2005
45463 posts
Posted on 5/25/24 at 10:28 pm to
quote:

Meauxjeaux Why am I not surprised at your reaction.


Because 1kneal continues to exhibit shite catching techniques and I like appreciate quality catching?
Posted by Tigershine
New Orleans
Member since Dec 2015
1947 posts
Posted on 5/25/24 at 10:30 pm to
I have a feeling Neal has practiced this exact situation, knew where to put his knee and his foot , to not touch home, to not be forward the plate . And that's exactly what happened.
This post was edited on 5/25/24 at 10:34 pm
Posted by LL7
Houston
Member since Mar 2010
3390 posts
Posted on 5/25/24 at 10:32 pm to
The camera angle they showed on Sports Center right after the softball game shows that Neal clearly stepped in front of the plate before he caught the ball.
Posted by notbilly
alter
Member since Sep 2015
6669 posts
Posted on 5/25/24 at 10:32 pm to
quote:

You realize that a batter is allowed to swing at a pitch, right? The batter could have knocked Neal in the back of the head and it would have been catcher's interference.



You are getting downvoted, but you are right. What Neal did is fine ONLY b/c the batter didn't swing.
Posted by Meauxjeaux
102836 posts including my alters
Member since Jun 2005
45463 posts
Posted on 5/25/24 at 10:34 pm to
quote:

But you got to see how others don’t care because at the end of the day he didn’t actually violate the rule the umps said he did


I do see what they’re saying. And I agree it does not violate the rule.

My point is at the highest echelon of D1 baseball we should expect better.

Look, i like the kid. I don’t like how he has regressed since the first half of his freshman season.

He’s extremely lucky he’s not in the hospital right now.

Whoever is coaching, this kid is screwing him up big-time.
Posted by notbilly
alter
Member since Sep 2015
6669 posts
Posted on 5/25/24 at 10:34 pm to
quote:

The camera angle they showed on Sports Center right after the softball game shows that Neal clearly stepped in front of the plate before he caught the ball.



He stepped on the side of it. In front would imply fair territory. Neal never touched the plate and his toes might have been past the front line of the plate, but he never stepped in front of the plate.
Posted by saint tiger225
San Diego
Member since Jan 2011
45556 posts
Posted on 5/25/24 at 10:34 pm to
quote:

his stupid trolls make me want to kick puppies



I've noticed that about him. There's a few who will take any situation, win or loss, to troll. 00 Tech Grad, Tiger Prophet are some others that immediately come to mind.
Posted by JPLSU1981
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2005
27885 posts
Posted on 5/25/24 at 10:39 pm to
Blame the rule, blame the umps, blame the replay review rules…. Lots of blame that will be discussed… In more important circles than here because we all watched that nonsense. A bright light was shine on it.

But blaming the catcher and the defense there is silly…… for ANYONE that has common sense.
This post was edited on 5/25/24 at 10:42 pm
Posted by LSUgrad88
Member since Jun 2009
8201 posts
Posted on 5/25/24 at 10:41 pm to
quote:

What Neal did is fine ONLY b/c the batter didn't swing.


The batter COULD NOT swing because he left the batters box. Why is this simple fact so hard for many of you to get straight.
Posted by 0
Member since Aug 2011
17341 posts
Posted on 5/25/24 at 10:43 pm to
quote:

Neil should’ve been clocked in the back of the head with 100 mile an hour swing.


Batter left the box. Would have been hard to hit the catcher as he was running away from the plate.

quote:

he stays crouched even with a stupid arse one kneel down stuff, he catches the ball puts the glove on the plate and runner is out.


This is false. Neal had to take 2 steps to be In line with the plate. Simply dropping his glove would not have done anything.

quote:

You gain absolutely zero by moving onto the plate like he did. Whether he actually touched it or went in front of it or not.


This is also false. Neal played it perfectly. He caught the ball in a perfect defensive stance to tag the runner coming home. His right foot was on the side of the plate, and his left foot was behind. It was literally textbook defensive play from the catchers position.

The umps fricked up, plain and simple. Not only did they get the balk call wrong but they awarded SC a run even though the runner never touched the plate.
Posted by notbilly
alter
Member since Sep 2015
6669 posts
Posted on 5/25/24 at 10:45 pm to
quote:

But he didn’t…he stepped completely out the box before the pitch was delivered



That's not accurate. The batter has both feet in the box when Herring released the ball. See the frame below. In the second pic, the ball is cleary on it's way (near Herring's foot from this angle) and the batter still has a foot in the box.

Ump still fricked the call, but the batter was in the box when it was thrown.



Posted by WHATDOINO
Member since Dec 2008
6857 posts
Posted on 5/25/24 at 10:49 pm to
quote:

You idiots all want to have hot takes but you just make yourselves look stupid AF because you end up posting dumb shite like this.



Dude check his post history. Lol. It’s what he does
Posted by 0
Member since Aug 2011
17341 posts
Posted on 5/25/24 at 10:57 pm to
quote:

the ball is cleary on it's way (near Herring's foot from this angle) and the batter still has a foot in the box.


He is also clearly moving backwards
Posted by Meauxjeaux
102836 posts including my alters
Member since Jun 2005
45463 posts
Posted on 5/25/24 at 11:06 pm to
quote:

He is also clearly moving backwards


You think that’s relevant and you’re running me down about rule technicalities lol
Posted by Meauxjeaux
102836 posts including my alters
Member since Jun 2005
45463 posts
Posted on 5/25/24 at 11:08 pm to
I think the problem here is we have a bunch of perfect game experts who think the 16-year-old pop times of 1.7 are awesome when they release the ball 8 inches in front of the plate.
Posted by tigerfoot
Alexandria
Member since Sep 2006
60499 posts
Posted on 5/25/24 at 11:11 pm to
quote:

realize that a batter is allowed to swing at a pitch, right? The batter could have knocked Neal in the back of the head and it would have been catcher's interference.
but he didn’t. So tell me why it’s inference .
Posted by beauchristopher
Member since Jan 2008
71455 posts
Posted on 5/25/24 at 11:13 pm to
And what about the batter leaving the box before the pitch was thrown?
What's the rule on that? Someone quoted a rule stating it's a strike penalty. Also with runners on it is possibly a 2 strike penalty?
Posted by Choupique19
The cheap seats
Member since Sep 2005
64456 posts
Posted on 5/25/24 at 11:13 pm to
quote:

but he didn’t. So tell me why it’s inference .


I didn’t call it interference, I only said that Neal didn’t “play it perfectly” as another poster said he did.
Posted by LSUDad
Still on the move
Member since May 2004
61727 posts
Posted on 5/25/24 at 11:15 pm to
quote:

That’s correct but the batter stepped out before that which is an automatic strike. The umps ignored that altogether.


Bingo. Just like when the time ran out on the SC pitcher, Travinski went to first. That was the third strike, inning over!
Posted by tigerfoot
Alexandria
Member since Sep 2006
60499 posts
Posted on 5/25/24 at 11:16 pm to
quote:

do see what they’re saying. And I agree it does not violate the rule. My point is at the highest echelon of D1 baseball we should expect better.
better than a defense of a slow move to home w a runner on an attempted steal.

shite.
quote:

He’s extremely lucky he’s not in the hospital right now.
drama much?
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram