- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 'Bama players complain about officiating
Posted on 1/10/17 at 10:58 am to Ace Midnight
Posted on 1/10/17 at 10:58 am to Ace Midnight
Now they know how the rest of the SEC feels playing them!
Posted on 1/10/17 at 10:58 am to LSUStar
Bama players have melted super hard tbh. Way harder than the fans.
Posted on 1/10/17 at 11:15 am to Stephen1979
quote:
Officials have no bias. I've read it here numerous times. Tiger tracker has a plethora of stats to support that fact.
It's funny how you could have such strong opinions on an article you never read, but here you are saying dumb shite about it in another thread. Try reading the article. The whole thing was about ref bias.
quote:
Crying about the officiating is the work of crybabies and losers.
Indeed it is. They sound like all of you on the thread I posted.
Posted on 1/10/17 at 11:21 am to EZE Tiger Fan
quote:
If that's an SEC Game, they lose
Why i thought the whole thing was rigged? Why does it matter if it's an SEC game? Like you said, it's all fixed so Clemson would've won no matter what since we all watched a wwe wrestling match last night right?
Posted on 1/10/17 at 11:42 am to LSUStar
It's nice to see the Gumps crying about the officiating for a change. O.J. Howard blatantly held on Scarborough's first TD run and the two targeting no calls were blatant violations. Screw those entitled Gump a-holes. Let 'em whine. They've benefited for years from poor officiating. It's nice to see karma come back to bite 'em in the arse.
Posted on 1/10/17 at 11:43 am to Tiger Tracker
Finebaum crying about the poor officiating and that they shouldn't have let that Big 12 crew work through game.
Those SEC refs are great though, huh Pawl?
Those SEC refs are great though, huh Pawl?
Posted on 1/10/17 at 11:49 am to bearhc
It was glorious to see the Outland trophy winner get flagged more in this game then the entire season combined.
Posted on 1/10/17 at 11:59 am to bulldog95
Poor Bama. Couldn't get bailed out by SEC refs. Deal with it. LSU does every year. Legal play. You lost. The end.
Posted on 1/10/17 at 12:01 pm to TigersFan64
quote:
O.J. Howard blatantly held on Scarborough's first TD run and the two targeting no calls were blatant violations.
It seems so to me as well. I admit, like Gump fans, I am biased, but I do not see LSU getting the kind of 'official' love in game that Alabama gets all the time. I am sure it has nothing to do with SEC HQ being in Birmingham and full of Gump alums, but then again, maybe it does...
Here's to Saban winning no more mythical national championships!
Posted on 1/10/17 at 12:07 pm to LSUStar
Bama is demanding a recount. They have hired Eric Holder.
Posted on 1/10/17 at 12:14 pm to bayou85
If you watch this play in its entirety you would see that the DB grabs the guy falling down and so gives him a reason to fall in front of that next DB. This is why nothing was called could have been called but wasn't. I say let them play unless it's an obvious penalty then throw that flag. In big games like this you let the guys play, also in regular season big matches let them play. This should be done much much more IMO would make the game so much better. GT
Posted on 1/10/17 at 12:16 pm to LSUStar
Posted on 1/10/17 at 12:28 pm to BayouBengal99
Everyone is wanting to do officials without knowing the rules, which is no surprise.
Pick plays and difficult to call, which is why they are rarely called. If you disengage from contact prior to the ball being thrown, then there is no foul, or ic contact is initiated by the defender, it is not a foul. It has to be overly obvious to be called, but I won't go on the opinions of novices
As for targeting, you have to lead with the crown of helmet against a defenseless player. If both players are going for the ball, it is not targeting and a difficult call to make correctly, so again. It has to 100% obvious. Again, I won't take the opinion of novices.
As for inteference it has to be obvious. High school does not require a catchable ball. College and professional does.
As for holding, the standard is that it has to affect thd play. The player has to be obstructed and thd held player needs to be making an effort to free himself. A defender standing there not trying to get out of the way will not elicit a holding call. We are not technicians.
And to the smart arse who commented about bias, good officials will not favor a certain team because they want to continue being officials. Yes, there may be case here or there, but they are called former officials
Pick plays and difficult to call, which is why they are rarely called. If you disengage from contact prior to the ball being thrown, then there is no foul, or ic contact is initiated by the defender, it is not a foul. It has to be overly obvious to be called, but I won't go on the opinions of novices
As for targeting, you have to lead with the crown of helmet against a defenseless player. If both players are going for the ball, it is not targeting and a difficult call to make correctly, so again. It has to 100% obvious. Again, I won't take the opinion of novices.
As for inteference it has to be obvious. High school does not require a catchable ball. College and professional does.
As for holding, the standard is that it has to affect thd play. The player has to be obstructed and thd held player needs to be making an effort to free himself. A defender standing there not trying to get out of the way will not elicit a holding call. We are not technicians.
And to the smart arse who commented about bias, good officials will not favor a certain team because they want to continue being officials. Yes, there may be case here or there, but they are called former officials
Posted on 1/10/17 at 12:31 pm to The Mick
quote:
The hit on Williams by Tony Brown was text book targeting which should have been an ejection, not even a question.
It wasn't with the crown of the helmet but with the side of his helmet as noted by the announcers and the replay official.
Posted on 1/10/17 at 12:33 pm to Chaseff
quote:
As for targeting, you have to lead with the crown of helmet against a defenseless player.
Doesn't the rule state that is one reason it can be called, but not the only one?
Posted on 1/10/17 at 12:36 pm to 2geaux
Just curious where the refs were from? I didn't think they were horrible. Found it interested Alabama does not get a lot calls in SEC play and nownthe past two games they got to see what it's like getting penalties.
Posted on 1/10/17 at 12:39 pm to LSUJuicer
Boo Frick in hoo, get u some of that
Posted on 1/10/17 at 12:40 pm to Tiger Tracker
quote:
Why i thought the whole thing was rigged?
I hate it when fans of other teams take my posts and turn them into something it wasn't.
quote:
Like you said, it's all fixed so Clemson would've won no matter what since we all watched a wwe wrestling match last night right?
I stated I view it similarly to wrestling, where it is an entertainment piece for me. Nothing more, nothing less. As I stated in a thread earlier, I only watched one play last night, and that was when the Bama player clearly targeted a Clemson player and nothing was called. I changed the channel. I felt like that type of game wasn't going to entertain me.
I woke up this morning, saw the results, and realized I missed some great entertainment last night. My loss, but certainly not for the reasons you are framing above.
Again, I don't know how else to explain it, but I don't view CFB, NFL or any other sport other than that: Entertainment. Sometimes, as part of the show, strange things are going to happen. I have no problem with that, unless player safety becomes compromised.
Does Bama get away with it more often in the SEC? It is my opinion, as well as the opinion of many others that they do. So be it. My observation that you quoted above does not change: Had last night's game been an SEC with Bama playing anyone, anywhere in the SEC, they would not have lost based on what I read this morning. I can't remember the last time Bama had 100 yards of penalties in a big game, and at this point, I don't really care.
Popular
Back to top


0




