- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Anyone noticed how the D improved once the 5 star players concerned with their brand left?
Posted on 12/2/21 at 5:02 pm to BlackAngus
Posted on 12/2/21 at 5:02 pm to BlackAngus
We would have beat Alabama with Steven end munger calling plays
Posted on 12/2/21 at 5:09 pm to SPEEDY
It had nothing to do with the lack of 5 stars. It had everything to do with switching the defense.
What you should be bitching about is how good this team could have been had our defense been called the same way it has since the Alabama game with
Andre Anthony
Ali Gaye
Maason Smith
Baskerville
Ricks
Stingley
Burns
Ryan
What you should be bitching about is how good this team could have been had our defense been called the same way it has since the Alabama game with
Andre Anthony
Ali Gaye
Maason Smith
Baskerville
Ricks
Stingley
Burns
Ryan
Posted on 12/2/21 at 5:12 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
O recruited too many primadonnas.
That's a deal breaker for any program
You won’t find many prima donnas when you’re winning, but you’ve got it backwards.
The lack of winning creates the problems, not the other way around.
Posted on 12/2/21 at 5:53 pm to SPEEDY
O created that curlture. Can't wait for this chapter to start
Posted on 12/2/21 at 6:04 pm to SPEEDY
The DB's sure had less busted coverages and seemed to communicate well. Damn prima donnas with all the talent in the world and just made themselves look bad when second and third stringers outperformed them.
Posted on 12/2/21 at 6:07 pm to SPEEDY
quote:
Talent means Jack shite if they aren’t in it for the team.
I agree, but it also coincided with the scheme change before the Bama game.
Posted on 12/2/21 at 6:10 pm to slackster
quote:
You won’t find many prima donnas when you’re winning, but you’ve got it backwards.
Non primadonnas arent pussies and opt out when they lose. They get better and make those around them better.
O recruited soft players who cry at the first sign of weakness and run elsewhere. Thats 100% a character flaw. Those people are not winners and need to be flushed from the program
These bitches will leave anyway if they don't start, of don't get enough NIL money.
Good riddance.
This post was edited on 12/2/21 at 6:18 pm
Posted on 12/2/21 at 6:44 pm to Big Gorilla
This is exactly why we need new top level DC and OC.
It will be interesting to see who Kelly Hires.
It will be interesting to see who Kelly Hires.
Posted on 12/2/21 at 7:16 pm to SPEEDY
quote:
Anyone noticed how the D improved once the 5 star players concerned with their brand left?
The D improved because O got fired and DJ was actually able to run the defense he wanted to run which was a 3-4 attacking style defense!
Instead of the 4-3 no blitz D that Oeaux was forcing DJ to run!
Posted on 12/2/21 at 7:33 pm to SPEEDY
quote:if not developed into strengths. The players were not well coached early on. Eventually things get better on the defense side. If we had those five stars by the end of the season, we would be 8-4 at least.
Talent means Jack shite if
Posted on 12/2/21 at 7:34 pm to crystalmaze
Point well taken……noticeable difference.
Posted on 12/2/21 at 7:56 pm to SPEEDY
The sad part is there’s not much nil money even out there
Posted on 12/2/21 at 7:58 pm to LSUDobber
quote:
The D played better when O STFU
Bingo!
Posted on 12/2/21 at 8:08 pm to Gus Tinsley
It is not often fans to get a glimpse into the dynamics that go into the game plan but for the Bama game we get a rare look.
O - identified the need to change the front / gave thumbs up to zero blitz
Coyle - found / designed the blitzes
Jones - installed the defense and called the plays in the game
Group effort
O - identified the need to change the front / gave thumbs up to zero blitz
Coyle - found / designed the blitzes
Jones - installed the defense and called the plays in the game
Group effort
This post was edited on 12/2/21 at 8:09 pm
Posted on 12/2/21 at 8:18 pm to SPEEDY
That kind of attitude would make us fall quick. You want to turn into Ole Miss or MS State? Go after non NIL guys.
Posted on 12/2/21 at 8:33 pm to Boomshockalocka
quote:
On the decision to move to 3-4 looks on defense...
"I told the guys we have to change going into Alabama. I was looking at the front, since that’s my expertise, and we weren’t stopping the run in the 4-3. You have to do different things … I knew some defenses we could put in that were better against the run, and they would change their blocking schemes. Why I was doing that, other people were researching, and Coach Coyle came up to me and said he’s got blitzes that he knows can get home, but they have to be zero. I said run them. We put them in, ran them all week and they have been working for us."
This glosses over the fact that he is the one that insisted on the move to the 4-3.
Posted on 12/2/21 at 9:01 pm to thejudge
quote:
When Neal Ferrell got Benny Logan back things changed drastically.
I bet they did
Posted on 12/3/21 at 5:52 am to BlackAngus
Only bc we had 36 guys dress for Bama game.
Back to top


0



