- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 5/4/18 at 12:41 pm to Geauxgurt
These assistant figures could be before any supplemental pay from TAF, which would explain Krags salary being reduced that much.
Posted on 5/4/18 at 12:58 pm to Tiger Ree
frick off, shithead.
If you don’t get the point the original poster made, you’re a dumbass.
But hey ... I bet THIS is the part of the post you had problems with:
But enough. I don’t normally respond to a paid shill and dick sucker, other than to stop by and downvote.
If you don’t get the point the original poster made, you’re a dumbass.
But hey ... I bet THIS is the part of the post you had problems with:
quote:
This will be one less excuse for losing to Bama
But enough. I don’t normally respond to a paid shill and dick sucker, other than to stop by and downvote.
This post was edited on 5/4/18 at 1:01 pm
Posted on 5/4/18 at 1:18 pm to cra_cra
quote:
Made possible by O taking less money so they could put more money into the coaches, and staff, and get some coaches off payroll.
What? O altruistically "taking less money" for the good of the program?
He's not "taking less money". He's taking over $1.5 million MORE than his actual market value. That is unless you think someone besides LSU was going to pay him at or slightly over $1,000,000 to be a position coach.
Posted on 5/4/18 at 2:27 pm to Alt26
quote:
What? O altruistically "taking less money" for the good of the program?
That’s not really the point. O sold himself as a discount not with a discount. In other words he knew he wasn’t worth what the market value for a coach at LSU was.
“Hire me and support staff you need to compete with other big time programs or hire someone else without the support staff.”
In the long run, this will help the program because the staff has already expanded and is part of the “budget”. I’m not trying to praise O for this, he did what he had to do to sell himself; he wasn’t looking out for the program, at least not above himself. But the byproduct is an expanded staff which is a good thing because it was needed to stay competitive and will persist after O runs his course here.
Posted on 5/4/18 at 2:50 pm to Mo Jeaux
quote:If they lose more than they should, will you like it then?? Lol
I like it.
Posted on 5/4/18 at 2:52 pm to timlan2057
quote:
But enough, I don't normally respond to a paid shill and dick sucker
Are you sure Ree is a paid shill?
quote:
other than to stop by and downvote.
Nice to know I'm not the only one. 
Posted on 5/4/18 at 3:18 pm to tubucoco
quote:
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I like it.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If they lose more than they should, will you like it then?? Lol
Unlike what you may be able to accept, an LSU fan liking the fact that the program has added support is not a bad thing.
How happy will you be IF LSU loses more than they should? That is the question you need to ponder.
Posted on 5/4/18 at 5:48 pm to OceanMan
NCAA increased the GA to 4.
Posted on 5/4/18 at 7:38 pm to Tiger Ree
Surprise surprise. Defensive ones paid well. No wonder our offense is clueless. I mean honestly, can we get something that remotely resembles a Read Option? That is what moves the chains in 2018. Not this Under center Iowa looking offense.
Posted on 5/4/18 at 8:20 pm to tigernnola
quote:
NCAA increased the GA to 4.
Thanks
Posted on 5/4/18 at 9:20 pm to Tiger Ree
There are no stats guys. All coaches. Coaches are great but we need some numbers guys on staff, too.
This post was edited on 5/4/18 at 9:21 pm
Posted on 5/4/18 at 9:25 pm to cra_cra
quote:
Yet, more positives on turning this thing around. Made possible by O taking less money so they could put more money into the coaches, and staff, and get some coaches off payroll.
I’d rather a HC who actually is an x and o guy and takes care of at least one side of the ball.
Plus I’d rather an actual successful OC rather than promoting the guy who was the position coach of a nkt so successful position.
Should we really be impressed by these offensive consultants?
Posted on 5/4/18 at 9:34 pm to Tiger Ree
The question I have is why are we able to attract analysts at such paltry salaries to live in such a shut hole state with a terrible quality of life according to you yet we can’t attract big name coaches at 70 times those salaries
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News