re: After rewatching a couple games, i think we will look back and call BK an elite coach

Says the guy who comes back with an insult, and it doesn’t even make sense. Keep showing that brilliance of yours.

“Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.”

-Mark Twain

quote:

---

Says the guy who comes back with an insult,

---

Actually never insulted you. However, you are acting like a liberal. All you do is claim to be smarter about a subject and result to insults lmfao. When you cannot even answer a basic question. As I said I am praying for your soul.

"The fool thinks himself to be wise, while a wise man knows himself to be a fool."

You called me a liberal, that’s an insult. Dude, I’m not going back and forth with your childishness. Go away.

quote:

---

I’m not going back and forth with your childishness

---

LMFAO. The Hypocrisy. Opponents must be gently instructed, in the hope that God will grant them repentance leading them to a knowledge of the truth.

HaHaHa

quote:

---

Now when you look at the throws he is making he is still shredding defenses in the intermediate game. Which I might add is his best area throwing the football.

---

EVERY.SINGLE.GAME that is where he is best. Yet, it's as if Sloan doesn't even watch the tape because every game LSU starts off the first few series with a bunch of ineffective throws to the boundary and the usual ineffective running game. At some point after Sloan finally accepts that approach isn't going to produce anything for the 11th, 12th, 14th, 16th, time, you start seeing crossers and slants between the hashes. Like "magic", the passing game begins to cook.

It's not "plays". It's an understanding of what your guys do best. Two completely different OLs don't block the running game approach well. It's HIGHLY unlikely LSU just stumbled upon 10 different O-linemen that can't run block. It's more like what they are being asked to do isn't effective. So rather than continue to do the same thing over and over, change the approach.

Just go back and look at 2021. LSU was terrible on the ground during the first 5 games. In game 6 (Kentucky) they insert Jack Mashburn and start to run a lot more counter. TDP goes for nearly 150. The next week he sets the single game rushing record. LSU didn't replace their entire OL or suddenly get better at doing what they were previously doing overnight. They adjusted the approach to what fit their personnel.

If you watch a game from 2024 and the first 3 games from 2025, the approach looks EXACTLY the same. Nothing has changed. The only difference is opponents now have 16 games of film to prepare for what LSU is doing.

quote:

---

5 interceptions and we could only score 20?

---

It's worse. 1 TD by the offense. 1 by the defense, and 2 field goals.

quote:

---

EVERY.SINGLE.GAME that is where he is best. Yet, it's as if Sloan doesn't even watch the tape because every game LSU starts off the first few series with a bunch of ineffective throws to the boundary and the usual ineffective running game. At some point after Sloan finally accepts that approach isn't going to produce anything for the 11th, 12th, 14th, 16th, time, you start seeing crossers and slants between the hashes. Like "magic", the passing game begins to cook.

---

I agree with you. As I have said. Every pass play should have at least 1 player on an in-breaker. Down and distance can determine depth of route and route concept but we always need a receiver having a shake, dig, shallow or deep crosser, or slant in our concept.

The splits, spacing, depth, and synching of routes in our route concepts has been very poor the last two weeks outside a couple plays. Seeing 2 receivers in the same area over and over where 1 defender can actually play both is maddening.

That’s all I want to see fixed. The deep shots are going to come eventually but play calls and play design can be tightened and cleaned up allowing us to be more successful.