- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 3rd party witness confirms Jefferson and Johns involvment...
Posted on 8/25/11 at 1:37 pm to ScoopAndScore
Posted on 8/25/11 at 1:37 pm to ScoopAndScore
My question is if they released the whole police report because if Lowery was kicked out of the bar or if there was a scuffle inside the bar that would have to be reported. From my experiences working at the bar the police would have at the very least talked to the bar manager. So, if there was a fight inside the bar involving any of the parties involved that would be in the police report.
0
Posted on 8/25/11 at 1:39 pm to TheDoc
quote:
Posted by TheDoc
If the players implicated had nothing to hide, why didnt they stick around to talk to cops?
Jeff! Jeff! Jeff! Let's go!
Posted on 8/25/11 at 1:41 pm to Pinetar
quote:
i'm beginning to think that the only thing worse than your command of the english language is your logic.
there is no implication whatsoever by the statement "while standing outside." it is simply a statement that the alleged attack took place outside as opposed to inside. if you choose to interpret that to mean that he was inside when he made the statement (as opposed to when the attack took place), that is an inference on your part that does not follow logically from the statement made.
quote:
why would he then stick around
there was nobody there when the cop first arrived. he returns sometime later and encounters this guy who said he was attacked. could it be possible that this "victim" left the scene before the cop arrived and then returned? maybe he left after getting in a fight with some football players and came back when he heard the cops were there. problem is, you don't know and we don't know. but you are performing mental gymnastics to try to support your point while criticizing others. get you yard in order first, then criticize your neighbors.
How ignorant are you? I said it was not an explicit implication. You could draw several different inferences from it, but none are relevant to the conclusion drawn.
There was a crowd of people there and he spoke to several people. Can't you read either?
How does this work for you. He was there talking to the cops after supposedly being not only the aggressor in a fight but also a stalker and having been kicked out of the bar. If police spoke to anyone at the bar they would have probably been told of anything out of the ordinary that night. Like maybe that Lowery was tossed out. It would likely be in this report and shed negative light on Lowery's statement. I really love how you question my logic. Get a math degree and then get back to me.
Posted on 8/25/11 at 1:41 pm to TigerKnights
Not reading this whole thread, but why the frick does Jefferson have 49 pairs of shoes?
Posted on 8/25/11 at 1:42 pm to Cadello
quote:
I am starting to believe this isnt about Lowery at all and about one of the other 3, who must be connected to money or power.
That was known the minute they all lawyered up. Where have you been? Money is pushing this investigation, and all Fisher and LSU are saying is, yes sir.
Posted on 8/25/11 at 1:42 pm to Joe Joe Joe
quote:
Doesn't make sense considering the fight occurred in the parking lot. Why would Shady's or anyone else let this kid back in the bar after a fight? Every bar and bouncer I know wants it out of the bar as quickly as possible.
Ur not going to be aloud in a bar with blood all over you. plain and simple.
Posted on 8/25/11 at 1:42 pm to TheDoc
quote:
If the players implicated had nothing to hide, why didnt they stick around to talk to cops?
Maybe they were told to leave? Maybe they didn't know the cops were coming. If they had been in the bar and were now standing out of the bar, chances are they were going to leave anyway. Why would they then decide to stay after getting into a fight?
This post was edited on 8/25/11 at 1:44 pm
Posted on 8/25/11 at 1:44 pm to TheDoc
quote:
If the players implicated had nothing to hide, why didnt they stick around to talk to cops?
Yes, or my question, if Lowery did have something to hide why did he stick around to talk to the cops?
Posted on 8/25/11 at 1:45 pm to Stewie Griffin
quote:
Not reading this whole thread, but why the frick does Jefferson have 49 pairs of shoes?
He likes his AJs, get over it. I'm sure you buy a bunch of stuff he wouldn't...
Posted on 8/25/11 at 1:45 pm to MightierThePenIs
quote:
Did JJ possibly spit on the guy on the ground after he allegedly kicked him?
Not the only way to get DNA Einstein!
Posted on 8/25/11 at 1:45 pm to mattchewbocca
quote:
just b/c they cant put a cast on it doesnt mean it's not serious!....and any injury to the spine is most definately serious!!!
if this was an injury to his spinal cord, i'd be singing a different tune. don't be a retard.
Posted on 8/25/11 at 1:46 pm to Stewie Griffin
quote:
Not reading this whole thread, but why the frick does Jefferson have 49 pairs of shoes?
Cuz he stylin son!
Posted on 8/25/11 at 1:47 pm to ScoopAndScore
quote:
Which one has broken vertebrae - marine or first guy?
quote:
The man who was knocked unconscious and suffered contusions to his head, nose and hands is a Marine, police said.
All im trying to point out is, we went from JJ kicking a marine to now breaking someones vertebrae. JJ should be arrested. see how stupid this all is. We still dont know what happened.
This post was edited on 8/25/11 at 1:52 pm
Posted on 8/25/11 at 1:47 pm to TigerKnights
quote:
I said it was not an explicit implication
once again, is this even possible?
Posted on 8/25/11 at 1:48 pm to DEANintheYAY
quote:
DEANintheYAY
how do you connect the witness to Lowery again?
Posted on 8/25/11 at 1:48 pm to Tigerrama55
quote:
u r completely wrong that 3 broken vertebrae is not a serious injury. Multiple M.D.'s have stated that to break a vertebra that extreme force, usually with a blunt object would have to be used.
No, it does not require extreme force.
Posted on 8/25/11 at 1:48 pm to bmy
quote:
and any injury to the spine is most definately serious!!!
Any injury to the spine with potential for instability is definitely serious. A stable vertebral fracture is not a serious threat to your ability to function normally.
Posted on 8/25/11 at 1:50 pm to bmy
quote:
if this was an injury to his spinal cord, i'd be singing a different tune. don't be a retard.
oh excuse me ....i meant the vertebrae which protects the spinal cord! still serious!
and who are you? ...zach galifianakis?
Posted on 8/25/11 at 1:50 pm to Geaux2Hell
quote:
Any injury to the spine with potential for instability is definitely serious. A stable vertebral fracture is not a serious threat to your ability to function normally.
Nor does it require treatment, a majority of the time.
Posted on 8/25/11 at 1:51 pm to mattchewbocca
quote:
oh excuse me ....i meant the vertebrae which protects the spinal cord! still serious!
You think it's serious because you are ignorant.
Page 15 of 21
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News