- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 12/11/09 at 3:01 pm to Dobermann
LB play was impressive
At least the S were in better position this year compared to last - Coleman and Jones were lost last year
DL talent is disturbing but that is more a reflection on Miles/Lane than Chavis
When will LSU switch to 3/4 to compensate for lack of talent on dline? that seems to be the new trend
With that said, the Texas DL is not dominant either but Muschamp seems to get pressure
At least the S were in better position this year compared to last - Coleman and Jones were lost last year
DL talent is disturbing but that is more a reflection on Miles/Lane than Chavis
When will LSU switch to 3/4 to compensate for lack of talent on dline? that seems to be the new trend
With that said, the Texas DL is not dominant either but Muschamp seems to get pressure
Posted on 12/11/09 at 3:05 pm to Xenophon
quote:
there was virtually no pressure on the QB ever..
No. There was pressure, there were just no sacks. The QB always escaped the rush and made a throw. We didn't try to disrupt the throw or get in his face, we ran full speed right at the QB who would always just take 3 steps to the side and escaped the rush.
I hope this is something Miles addresses. We have to stop letting the QB escape the pocket.
Posted on 12/11/09 at 3:06 pm to dutchtowntiger100
I do not think a passive defense is the answer to any problems. Just ask a Tennessee fan. It reminds me of Lou Tepper all over again. Look at what an agressive defense like Alabama or Nebraska does to opponents. He is not the answer.
Posted on 12/11/09 at 4:07 pm to geauxjudge
quote:
3rd and Chavis?
Saw way too much of it this year. I don't think our LBing talent is all that great, and our D line was not our strong point, but DAMN you take our secondary and play ten yards off the ball on a third and three and it seemed to equal first down.
It also led to our defense being on the field way too long. It takes opportunity and consistency away from the offense.
Third down efficency:
Alabama 29.38
Florida 30.17
Mississippi 30.73
Auburn 33.73
Tennessee 34.12
Arkansas 36.02
Georgia 36.20
Mississippi St. 36.36
South Carolina 36.63
LSU 36.76
Vanderbilt 38.34
Kentucky 39.66
It's better than what we had last year, but that is pathetic and I hate this defense.
Posted on 12/11/09 at 4:19 pm to LSUcjb318
Bottom line. The defense played well enough to win every game. 13 points to the Gators-Offense let the team down. Alabama- Great defensive play, maybe the best of the year, wiped out by a horribly incompetent officiating crew, thus denying the offense a chance to win the game. Ole Mrs- Team mismanagement on offense lost the game though the defense did give up too many yards. Anyway, Chief's defense did not lose any games and that is a big improvement.
Posted on 12/11/09 at 4:31 pm to Suntiger
quote:
but DAMN you take our secondary and play ten yards off the ball on a third and three and it seemed to equal first down.
Amen!! AS physical as our DBs are, we should be jamming the WR at the LOS.
quote:
RANDY44
quote:
mismanagement on offense lost the game
That and the blown PP play when Mccluster threw the TD. The game should have never come down to us having to score on the final drive. So I would put more on the D for that loss though the other 2 Ls were definately O.
Posted on 12/11/09 at 4:45 pm to LSUcjb318
3rd and chavis defiantly exist. 3rd and 20 vs arky with the game on the line = arky first down bc of prevent d on 3rd down
Posted on 12/11/09 at 4:54 pm to heartbreakTiger
For the first year under a new coach, I thought things well pretty good. Now that the team has had a year of work with him, I would expect improvement next year. Yes, the defense did play well enough to keep us in every game as well as close enough to make them winnable.
NOW something needs to happen with that fricking offense.
Also, someone needs to teach Les to tell time.
NOW something needs to happen with that fricking offense.
Also, someone needs to teach Les to tell time.
Posted on 12/11/09 at 5:02 pm to DaSaltyTiger
It was the ultimate bend but don't break defense. Great improvement from last year and will only get better. I'm relieved with the Chavis hire.
Posted on 12/11/09 at 5:19 pm to biglego
quote:3rd and Chavis needs to be changed to "between the 20's".
Yup. I dont know if I've ever seen a defense so unimpressive to look at and that gave up so much yardage and yet kept teams out of the end zone so well.
Posted on 12/11/09 at 5:22 pm to Tiger_n_ATL
I think they were really gassed by the Ark game. They sure spent a lot of time on the field partly because of the inept offense and partly because of the bend but don't break philosophy. The defense deserves a pass for the Ark game.
Posted on 12/11/09 at 7:55 pm to LSUcjb318
Don't forget that our linebackers were a very average bunch also. Overall Chavis did a very good job.
Posted on 12/11/09 at 7:57 pm to LSUcjb318
quote:
better than last year.
Yes, the defense was better than last year. Better than the worst defense LSU has had in at least 11 years, maybe ever. Chavis is good. Not great, but good.
Posted on 12/11/09 at 7:59 pm to RANDY44
quote:
Alabama- Great defensive play, maybe the best of the year,
We gave up 450 yards and 24 points (21 if you take away the 3 they got after Peterson's interception). That's not too bad, but hardly great. Alabama ripped through our defense throughout the second half.
Posted on 12/11/09 at 8:01 pm to Suntiger
quote:
Alabama 29.38
...
LSU 36.76
It's amazing how much difference seven little percentage points make. That's only one out of about every 14 attempts, or roughly one more third down conversion per game. And look at the difference in results.
This post was edited on 12/12/09 at 9:46 am
Posted on 12/11/09 at 8:01 pm to KingwoodLsuFan
cant help but compare it to a particular past defense.....doesnt match up.
Posted on 12/11/09 at 8:15 pm to LSUcjb318
I never pined for Chavis when he was at Tennessee and wasn't as thrilled at the hire as some, but he "coached up" his position without question and definitely improved the defense.
Of course improving on last years product was not a big chore, but he improved it significantly nonetheless and should be given that due credit.
IMHO Chavis is solid. Not innovative or spectacular but solid. I see him as a defensive version of Jimbo Fisher in that respect and we could do much worse, as we showed in 2008.
Of course improving on last years product was not a big chore, but he improved it significantly nonetheless and should be given that due credit.
IMHO Chavis is solid. Not innovative or spectacular but solid. I see him as a defensive version of Jimbo Fisher in that respect and we could do much worse, as we showed in 2008.
Posted on 12/11/09 at 8:31 pm to Tiger Ugly
A better D-line and some better TOP from offense will turn it around. They spent to much time on the field and were gassed in a lot of games.
He did well with what was there.
He did well with what was there.
Posted on 12/11/09 at 8:45 pm to LSUcjb318
This year's defense was waaaaay beyond my expectations. A+ for Chavis.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News