Started By
Message

re: 10 blown calls by refs that ensured Bama beat LSU, with images

Posted on 11/10/14 at 9:58 pm to
Posted by cwill
Member since Jan 2005
54752 posts
Posted on 11/10/14 at 9:58 pm to
Let it go, get over it.
Posted by Dunk47
Member since Jan 2014
1059 posts
Posted on 11/10/14 at 10:00 pm to
So you don't notice the deep safeties and CBs giving deep cushions letting the WRs eat up yardage underneath and get out of bounds on the last drive?

Or was that the refs fault too?
Posted by TigerCub
Team Boxtard
Member since May 2006
20215 posts
Posted on 11/10/14 at 10:12 pm to
quote:

I am ready to move on but if you do not think the Tigers were Robbed, we definitely see it differently.


There were some bad calls but if LSU would have made one or two more plays they would have won in spite of it. And we got away with some stuff too.
Posted by austintexastiger
Austin, Texas
Member since Aug 2006
1914 posts
Posted on 11/10/14 at 10:16 pm to
this has been going on since the Bear Bryant days
Posted by Mulat
Avalon Bch, FL
Member since Sep 2010
17517 posts
Posted on 11/10/14 at 10:17 pm to
quote:

if LSU would have made one or two more plays they would have won in spite of it


Still don't think you get it yet
Posted by Alt26
Member since Mar 2010
28363 posts
Posted on 11/10/14 at 10:18 pm to
Despite all of that Alabama GAVE LSU the game when they fumbled inside their own 10.

Leading with 50 seconds left. The opponent has no TOs

1. Don't kick the ball out of bounds
2. Make ONE tackle in-bounds to keep the clock moving
3. Have some situational awareness. If Les thought the deep ball on the last drive wasn't caught. Call a TO to have it reviewed.
Posted by TigerCub
Team Boxtard
Member since May 2006
20215 posts
Posted on 11/10/14 at 10:18 pm to
quote:

Still don't think you get it yet


Yeah I'm pretty sure I do.
Posted by Tiger1242
Member since Jul 2011
31927 posts
Posted on 11/10/14 at 10:21 pm to
You'll get a lot of hate for this thread but I don't mind it so much.
Some of those calls are excusable, most are very bad.

I will say on #4 you're wrong at least on the illegal contact. He wasn't more than 5 yards past the line of scrimmage
Posted by GeauxTigerTM
Member since Sep 2006
30596 posts
Posted on 11/10/14 at 10:35 pm to
quote:

Yeah I'm pretty sure I do.


No, I don't think some of you do.

I don;t think anyone is in disagreement that if LSU had made more plays they could have overcome these issues that are being brought up. That's clearly the case. But then, that's the case in literally ANY situation where horrendous officiating effects a game. The team on the short end of the stick could have always played harder, made that extra play, gone above and beyond to overcome getting hosed, etc.

My question is...why does it seem perpetually necessary that LSU do this when playing Alabama? Why be so quick to seemingly accept this role rather than seek to rectify any potential issues that would require LSU to go beyond merely winning but winning large enough to overcome officiating problems?

I appreciate the lack of desire to look weak...to appear to be whining. No one likes that. But isn't being a dupe worse? Why should any of us (or for that matter the other 12 members of the conference) give two shits what BAMA fans consider "whining?"

BAMA fans do not respect you. A fanbase that sings Rammer Jammer is incapable of that. So long as the rest of the conference minds its business, stays quiet for fear of being called whiners, BAMA will continue to run roughshod over the remaining members by virtue of its undue influence within the SEC offices.

Put it this way...as an LSU fan, would you feel more, less or the same level of comfort having the SEC offices located in New Orleans with the #3 guy at the conference table who is most directly responsible for scheduling be an LSU alumnus and and LSU alumnus be the head of officiating? I'd be ecstatic, and I'd assume everyone else in the conference would be leery of the expected LSU bias to come.

You remember the final scene in The Untouchables with Kevin Costner and Sean Connery? Where Ness tricks the judge into switching the paid for jury with the jury next door? I imagine the average BAMA fan's reaction would be similar to DeNiro's if tomorrow the SEC offices packed up shop, moved West into office space in NOLA and made sweeping changes to some of the most prominent members of the administration.

We simply don;t get anything, respect or otherwise, for sitting quietly while getting systematically fricked. Sitting quietly while it happens is essentially emboldening the behavior.
Posted by Raider
Nashville, Tn
Member since Feb 2006
280 posts
Posted on 11/10/14 at 10:40 pm to
Get over it. Get a life
Posted by Storm22
Biloxi
Member since Jul 2013
922 posts
Posted on 11/10/14 at 10:44 pm to
Posted by sjmabry
Texas
Member since Aug 2013
18500 posts
Posted on 11/10/14 at 10:46 pm to
#5 was an egregious call.
Posted by JamesonandTiger
Arlington tx
Member since Sep 2014
330 posts
Posted on 11/10/14 at 10:59 pm to
Just let it go...you're just gonna lose sleep over it. Bama is gonna get the majority of the calls and we all know why. Unless you think it's just a coincidence that Saban's LSU teams were penalized WAY more than his Bama teams
Posted by la_birdman
Lake Charles
Member since Feb 2005
31014 posts
Posted on 11/10/14 at 11:00 pm to
Excellent post. No sarcasm.




Posted by chinesebandit76
Atlanta
Member since Nov 2007
515 posts
Posted on 11/10/14 at 11:10 pm to
I have a question about how the LSU penalty on Vadal and the penalty on the Alabama o-linemen in OT were assessed differently. Why was the LSU penalty a 2nd and goal from the 21 after the 15 yard penalty, and the Alabama penalty a 1st and 10 instead of a 1st and goal from the 16? Considering Bama barely got the first on 3rd and 1, this could have made a big difference.
Posted by AlwysATgr
Member since Apr 2008
16446 posts
Posted on 11/11/14 at 12:24 am to
To preface: this thread is not about other things we should have done better that could've changed the outcome nor is it to say there were infractions we 'got away with', it's about a specific subset of plays that appear to have been incorrect calls. Discuss these.

I'll comment on two:
2) Had there been no call or offsetting PF's, no one would've looked at this and said the refs should've flagged that. It was a chicken poop call.
3) CRob is lined-up in the neutral space. Bama should've been flagged for encroachment.

Bonus: the contexts for the Vadal PF and the OT PF were dissimilar. For one, there was no clock in play in OT.
Posted by earl keese
A Thousand Miles from Nowhere
Member since Jan 2014
7027 posts
Posted on 11/11/14 at 1:02 am to
quote:

Go ARKIE.....AND the refs........ I hope LSU gets called for 20 penalties so I can go through this next week.............
You keep claiming to be a superfan of LSU athletics, yet you keep shooting yourself in the foot trying to prove it. And I still don't understand why a so-called fan would continue to spout off all the bullshite that you do.
Posted by hehateme2285
Katy, TX
Member since Dec 2007
5131 posts
Posted on 11/11/14 at 1:09 am to
#1 was a catch. Ground didn't aid him.

Miles said our coaches in the booth told him it was a catch and do not review. There was no way it was getting overturned
Posted by crimsonandwhite
Nashville
Member since Dec 2010
119 posts
Posted on 11/11/14 at 1:24 am to
quote:

#1 was a catch. Ground didn't aid him.

Miles said our coaches in the booth told him it was a catch and do not review. There was no way it was getting overturned


And yet all the haters on here believe they know more than Les, his coaches, the refs on the field, the review ref, the announcers and most of the rest of the world. Purple Glasses must really blur your vision.
Posted by TheDude321
Member since Sep 2005
3158 posts
Posted on 11/11/14 at 1:25 am to
There's an old saying that penalties occur on every single play, but the refs only catch a tiny fraction of 'em. The refs only called 5 penalties for the teams COMBINED, so they obviously just left the players free to play without much intervention. Honestly, no matter what happens from here on out, the final results (20-13) won't change--however, if the Tigers dwell on this past event instead of preparing for Arkansas (in only four more days), then they could lose again.
Jump to page
Page First 3 4 5 6 7 ... 13
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 13Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram