Started By
Message

re: 1 player on MBB roster?

Posted on 4/28/26 at 1:11 pm to
Posted by ChatGPT of LA
Member since Mar 2023
6093 posts
Posted on 4/28/26 at 1:11 pm to
quote:

Upvoting your own post is hysterical.


Can you? Im in! Which post did i up vote? Go back and check, I bet it goes up 1 now....showing your wrong....again, kid
Posted by TigerLunatik
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Jan 2005
108248 posts
Posted on 4/28/26 at 1:14 pm to
quote:

I gave the info

Your posting in this thread looks like this...



And you are telling other people to respond like adults. The only information that you have given is something from tik tok that says the 5th year won't be grandfathered in. Again, you are looking for information on the situation because you have no idea what is going on just like the rest of us. Unlike the rest of us, you are overly impatient and feel entitled to information right now. That is information you do not need an it's information you can't do anything with right now anyways.

Posted by Alt26
Member since Mar 2010
35519 posts
Posted on 4/28/26 at 1:21 pm to
quote:

The only information that you have given is something from tik tok that says the 5th year won't be grandfathered in. Again, you are looking for information on the situation because you have no idea what is going on just like the rest of us. Unlike the rest of us, you are overly impatient and feel entitled to information right now. That is information you do not need an it's information you can't do anything with right now anyways.


The NCAA President said yesterday that the NCAA is optimistic the 5 for 5 rule will pass. However, it will likely NOT be retroactive for players who have already exhausted their eligibility....


quote:

As the NCAA considers a generational change to the organization's eligibility rules for athletes, some potential clarity emerged regarding one of the most vexing parts of the age-based eligibility proposal.

NCAA president Charlie Baker told ESPN in a phone interview Monday that the implementation, which had been uncertain, is not expected to include athletes who graduated or exhausted their eligibility in the 2025-26 season.

"If you've used up your eligibility, you've used it up," Baker told ESPN of the tenor of the discussion of the Division I board of directors on Monday.

Baker added that he is "pretty optimistic" the new rules will pass.


IMO, that was always the most logical conclusion. Now, I'm sure there will be lawsuits/request for injunctions brought on behalf of some players that have already exhausted their eligibility. But I don't think it is a slam dunk at all those lawsuits will be successful.
Posted by ChatGPT of LA
Member since Mar 2023
6093 posts
Posted on 4/28/26 at 1:21 pm to
quote:

I dont even understand how the 5yr to play rule being voted on in May can be something he is waiting for


Go back and find explanation video that I posted. These clowns here are sadly mistaken!! They think a guy currently a senior in last year if eligibility, will be grandfathered another year. HE WILL NOT.

So in their bizzaro world, they think players that were left alone because eligibility was ending, will suddenly be on the open market for Wade to grab. And somehow magically LSU would have been the only ones bidding! But, the video proves none of that is reality.
NO EXTRA YEARS AWARDED TO EXPIRING ELIGIBILITY ATHLETES.

So, with that info in place, what's our current position look like? You can ask all day, but none of these self appointed smartasses will even attempt to answer. And the reason? It hurts them to admit that we would be in a world of shite
Posted by ChatGPT of LA
Member since Mar 2023
6093 posts
Posted on 4/28/26 at 1:23 pm to
quote:

TigerLunatik


Checks out

Go play in traffic, kid. Leave the adult stuff to others
Posted by drizztiger
Deal With it!
Member since Mar 2007
47669 posts
Posted on 4/28/26 at 1:24 pm to
quote:

Again, you are looking for information on the situation because you have no idea what is going on just like the rest of us.
Don’t add more confusion for him. I don’t think he can handle it.
Posted by sharkfhin
Water
Member since Sep 2008
6020 posts
Posted on 4/28/26 at 1:30 pm to
Even with that said and do understand better about the grandfathering in and what not but 247 sports shows players are done deals across the top 30 teams. Many are finished and yes they are finished "already".

I dont understand the quietness. I mean players that Wade could be potentially signing but hush so far for whatever reason, other teams had to have the same info? No? Yes? If so , regardless of that said player's position(what his situation is and why he hasnt signed yet) if he was somebody who can drop dbl digit games wouldn't other teams be knocking the door down by now also?
Posted by sharkfhin
Water
Member since Sep 2008
6020 posts
Posted on 4/28/26 at 1:32 pm to
So a 4th yr player who played and used up 4 yrs wont get a 5th but a 3rd yr player will have 2 more yrs to play?
This post was edited on 4/28/26 at 1:33 pm
Posted by rutiger
purgatory
Member since Jun 2007
21895 posts
Posted on 4/28/26 at 1:41 pm to
quote:

It hurts them to admit that we would be in a world of shite


In April???????

Posted by rutiger
purgatory
Member since Jun 2007
21895 posts
Posted on 4/28/26 at 1:42 pm to
quote:

I dont understand the quietness


Cool. What does that have to do with anything? Patience is a virtue.
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
70162 posts
Posted on 4/28/26 at 1:45 pm to
5 for 5 is holding everything up. Draft entries have to be complete by May 27th, a bunch of kids both 5th year and not have to decide, the 5th year guys have influence in this. The UFA will influence the G-league and overseas leagues who can take advantage of the Bediako rule now. The roster spots in these leagues are finite, until the draft entries and UFA groups are known nobody’s going to move and nobody will know that until the ruling and the withdrawal date. This isn’t rocket science.
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
70162 posts
Posted on 4/28/26 at 1:47 pm to
He wants it to be true so of course he’s going to bend everything to that outcome.
Posted by ChatGPT of LA
Member since Mar 2023
6093 posts
Posted on 4/28/26 at 1:47 pm to
quote:

In April?


With 1 roster player, that is a scrub transfer? Yes

Will LSU field a team? Of course

But dont expect much of anything. If roster isn't more stacked, an elite or top player isn't coming to waste a year with bad support players. Won't happen
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
70162 posts
Posted on 4/28/26 at 1:48 pm to
quote:

a scrub transfer



With every post you show how ignorant you are
Posted by sharkfhin
Water
Member since Sep 2008
6020 posts
Posted on 4/28/26 at 1:48 pm to
quote:

Cool. What does that have to do with anything? Patience is a virtue.
he is the only one being hush when 90% of the top 30 has their rosters done. Im not impatient, was just wondering what type of recruiting this is. Who is in the mix etc. Maybe he has a 7'6 kid(twins perhaps ) not in school that nobody knows about and has dreams of "Coming to America" to play basketball?
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
70162 posts
Posted on 4/28/26 at 1:50 pm to
That’s just false
Posted by ChatGPT of LA
Member since Mar 2023
6093 posts
Posted on 4/28/26 at 1:55 pm to
quote:

With every post you show how ignorant you are


Oh really...

Backups are considered scrubs

He was a backup, and in 3 years of college ball he averaged 6 pts per game
Let me be very very clear. Last year he was w Kentucky. They had the worst team maybe ever (not positive). He was a backup.

Sorry, but if you would have ever played, youde know a frequent non starter transfer, is considered a scrub.....or any other term you wish to apply.

No worries though, he posted a picture in LSU gear, presenting himself as a king!! So, he has to be legit, right? Now that I think about it, hes the only player on the roster, so yes, that makes him king for a day!
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
70162 posts
Posted on 4/28/26 at 1:56 pm to
Again you just try to invent your own reality because you don’t know what you’re talking about. It’s pathetic


quote:

Kentucky. They had the worst team maybe ever


With every post you show just how ignorant you are
This post was edited on 4/28/26 at 1:57 pm
Posted by redfishfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2015
5505 posts
Posted on 4/28/26 at 1:57 pm to
quote:

Oh really...

Backups are considered scrubs


I guess Manu was a scrub. Also there are 2 sides of the game of basketball. Offense and Defense. And so far we added one of the best defenders in the SEC.
Posted by sharkfhin
Water
Member since Sep 2008
6020 posts
Posted on 4/28/26 at 1:57 pm to
Im just asking bro. Thats it. Your other explanation alittle further up was a good read to understand all of this but why does Wade have to use this route? Because he has no team and no "pull yet" on regular portal top players and top hs recruits who go to better schools meaning he has to establish LSU again by winning as an attractive school in BB? So he is gonna do what he has too to win this year and build that bridge back? Real question. Why do you think he is taking the route you said above now? Is it because of what I said above? If so I totally get.
Jump to page
Page First 4 5 6 7 8 ... 15
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 15Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram