- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 4/28/26 at 1:14 pm to ChatGPT of LA
quote:
I gave the info
Your posting in this thread looks like this...
And you are telling other people to respond like adults. The only information that you have given is something from tik tok that says the 5th year won't be grandfathered in. Again, you are looking for information on the situation because you have no idea what is going on just like the rest of us. Unlike the rest of us, you are overly impatient and feel entitled to information right now. That is information you do not need an it's information you can't do anything with right now anyways.
Posted on 4/28/26 at 1:21 pm to TigerLunatik
quote:
The only information that you have given is something from tik tok that says the 5th year won't be grandfathered in. Again, you are looking for information on the situation because you have no idea what is going on just like the rest of us. Unlike the rest of us, you are overly impatient and feel entitled to information right now. That is information you do not need an it's information you can't do anything with right now anyways.
The NCAA President said yesterday that the NCAA is optimistic the 5 for 5 rule will pass. However, it will likely NOT be retroactive for players who have already exhausted their eligibility....
quote:
As the NCAA considers a generational change to the organization's eligibility rules for athletes, some potential clarity emerged regarding one of the most vexing parts of the age-based eligibility proposal.
NCAA president Charlie Baker told ESPN in a phone interview Monday that the implementation, which had been uncertain, is not expected to include athletes who graduated or exhausted their eligibility in the 2025-26 season.
"If you've used up your eligibility, you've used it up," Baker told ESPN of the tenor of the discussion of the Division I board of directors on Monday.
Baker added that he is "pretty optimistic" the new rules will pass.
IMO, that was always the most logical conclusion. Now, I'm sure there will be lawsuits/request for injunctions brought on behalf of some players that have already exhausted their eligibility. But I don't think it is a slam dunk at all those lawsuits will be successful.
Posted on 4/28/26 at 1:21 pm to sharkfhin
quote:
I dont even understand how the 5yr to play rule being voted on in May can be something he is waiting for
Go back and find explanation video that I posted. These clowns here are sadly mistaken!! They think a guy currently a senior in last year if eligibility, will be grandfathered another year. HE WILL NOT.
So in their bizzaro world, they think players that were left alone because eligibility was ending, will suddenly be on the open market for Wade to grab. And somehow magically LSU would have been the only ones bidding! But, the video proves none of that is reality.
NO EXTRA YEARS AWARDED TO EXPIRING ELIGIBILITY ATHLETES.
So, with that info in place, what's our current position look like? You can ask all day, but none of these self appointed smartasses will even attempt to answer. And the reason? It hurts them to admit that we would be in a world of shite
Posted on 4/28/26 at 1:23 pm to TigerLunatik
quote:
TigerLunatik
Checks out
Go play in traffic, kid. Leave the adult stuff to others
Posted on 4/28/26 at 1:24 pm to TigerLunatik
quote:Don’t add more confusion for him. I don’t think he can handle it.
Again, you are looking for information on the situation because you have no idea what is going on just like the rest of us.
Posted on 4/28/26 at 1:30 pm to ChatGPT of LA
Even with that said and do understand better about the grandfathering in and what not but 247 sports shows players are done deals across the top 30 teams. Many are finished and yes they are finished "already".
I dont understand the quietness. I mean players that Wade could be potentially signing but hush so far for whatever reason, other teams had to have the same info? No? Yes? If so , regardless of that said player's position(what his situation is and why he hasnt signed yet) if he was somebody who can drop dbl digit games wouldn't other teams be knocking the door down by now also?
I dont understand the quietness. I mean players that Wade could be potentially signing but hush so far for whatever reason, other teams had to have the same info? No? Yes? If so , regardless of that said player's position(what his situation is and why he hasnt signed yet) if he was somebody who can drop dbl digit games wouldn't other teams be knocking the door down by now also?
Posted on 4/28/26 at 1:32 pm to Alt26
So a 4th yr player who played and used up 4 yrs wont get a 5th but a 3rd yr player will have 2 more yrs to play?
This post was edited on 4/28/26 at 1:33 pm
Posted on 4/28/26 at 1:41 pm to ChatGPT of LA
quote:
It hurts them to admit that we would be in a world of shite
In April???????
Posted on 4/28/26 at 1:42 pm to sharkfhin
quote:
I dont understand the quietness
Cool. What does that have to do with anything? Patience is a virtue.
Posted on 4/28/26 at 1:45 pm to drizztiger
5 for 5 is holding everything up. Draft entries have to be complete by May 27th, a bunch of kids both 5th year and not have to decide, the 5th year guys have influence in this. The UFA will influence the G-league and overseas leagues who can take advantage of the Bediako rule now. The roster spots in these leagues are finite, until the draft entries and UFA groups are known nobody’s going to move and nobody will know that until the ruling and the withdrawal date. This isn’t rocket science.
Posted on 4/28/26 at 1:47 pm to rutiger
He wants it to be true so of course he’s going to bend everything to that outcome.
Posted on 4/28/26 at 1:47 pm to rutiger
quote:
In April?
With 1 roster player, that is a scrub transfer? Yes
Will LSU field a team? Of course
But dont expect much of anything. If roster isn't more stacked, an elite or top player isn't coming to waste a year with bad support players. Won't happen
Posted on 4/28/26 at 1:48 pm to ChatGPT of LA
quote:
a scrub transfer
With every post you show how ignorant you are
Posted on 4/28/26 at 1:48 pm to rutiger
quote:he is the only one being hush when 90% of the top 30 has their rosters done. Im not impatient, was just wondering what type of recruiting this is. Who is in the mix etc. Maybe he has a 7'6 kid(twins perhaps
Cool. What does that have to do with anything? Patience is a virtue.
Posted on 4/28/26 at 1:55 pm to Madking
quote:
With every post you show how ignorant you are
Oh really...
Backups are considered scrubs
He was a backup, and in 3 years of college ball he averaged 6 pts per game
Let me be very very clear. Last year he was w Kentucky. They had the worst team maybe ever (not positive). He was a backup.
Sorry, but if you would have ever played, youde know a frequent non starter transfer, is considered a scrub.....or any other term you wish to apply.
No worries though, he posted a picture in LSU gear, presenting himself as a king!! So, he has to be legit, right? Now that I think about it, hes the only player on the roster, so yes, that makes him king for a day!
Posted on 4/28/26 at 1:56 pm to ChatGPT of LA
Again you just try to invent your own reality because you don’t know what you’re talking about. It’s pathetic
With every post you show just how ignorant you are
quote:
Kentucky. They had the worst team maybe ever
With every post you show just how ignorant you are
This post was edited on 4/28/26 at 1:57 pm
Posted on 4/28/26 at 1:57 pm to ChatGPT of LA
quote:
Oh really...
Backups are considered scrubs
I guess Manu was a scrub. Also there are 2 sides of the game of basketball. Offense and Defense. And so far we added one of the best defenders in the SEC.
Posted on 4/28/26 at 1:57 pm to Madking
Im just asking bro. Thats it. Your other explanation alittle further up was a good read to understand all of this but why does Wade have to use this route? Because he has no team and no "pull yet" on regular portal top players and top hs recruits who go to better schools meaning he has to establish LSU again by winning as an attractive school in BB? So he is gonna do what he has too to win this year and build that bridge back? Real question. Why do you think he is taking the route you said above now? Is it because of what I said above? If so I totally get.
Popular
Back to top


0





