- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Not done in the portal for OL
Posted on 12/30/24 at 2:47 pm to ProjectP2294
Posted on 12/30/24 at 2:47 pm to ProjectP2294
I'm thinking Kelly is looking more seriously at the "uber"-experienced guys for Game 1 vs Clemson.
Losing your opener is waaay too big of deal for a team that has an SEC schedule and wants to make the playoffs. I think Kelly has finally learned this truth now.
Losing your opener is waaay too big of deal for a team that has an SEC schedule and wants to make the playoffs. I think Kelly has finally learned this truth now.
Posted on 12/30/24 at 2:48 pm to ProjectP2294
That’s not the reason, they were looking for OL before practices for the bowl started.
Posted on 12/30/24 at 2:56 pm to ReverendJeffro
quote:
That’s not the reason
Then what is?
quote:
they were looking for OL before practices for the bowl started.
No shite. But after the practices he made sure to update that we're still looking for more, which would be a change to his previous statements about the number of transfers we're taking.
Posted on 12/30/24 at 3:15 pm to Woodman
I believe he will have 2-3 seasons left to play if he transfers from WSU to LSU.
Posted on 12/30/24 at 3:23 pm to Kool Kaliper
quote:couldn't.
If the development of the linemen currently on the team isn't up to standards, I think that issue would fall on the feet of Brad Davis.
Not necessarily. They may have taken some of them with possible limitations physically or mentally that they thought they could work out of them and just haven't been able to. Recruiting and development isn't an exact science, which is why I like the transfer portal.
Posted on 12/30/24 at 3:30 pm to ProjectP2294
Yep he likely has a concern at one or more positions on the OL and thinks he may be able to upgrade. Not sure why people would downvote this. OL is probably the hardest position group to project from HS and some guys aren’t ready for SEC after only 1 or 2 years. Chester definitely wasn’t ready this year to be a starting C.
Posted on 12/30/24 at 3:40 pm to ProjectP2294
quote:
No shite. But after the practices he made sure to update that we're still looking for more, which would be a change to his previous statements about the number of transfers we're taking.
Wrong.
He said we're not done.
Stop reading something that isn't there.
Posted on 12/30/24 at 3:44 pm to wadewilson
quote:
Wrong.
He said we're not done.
Stop reading something that isn't there.
He said we're taking a specific number of guys. We're at that number and now says we're not done taking OL guys. The only thing that has happened in the interim between those statements is additional practice and eval time.
I'm not reading something that isn't there. I'm applying a skill that seems to be in short supply on this board.
Posted on 12/30/24 at 4:10 pm to ProjectP2294
quote:
He said we're taking a specific number of guys. We're at that number and now says we're not done taking OL guys. The only thing that has happened in the interim between those statements is additional practice and eval time.
Ok. When, specifically, did he give an exact number of how many OL we were getting in the portal, and what was that exact number?
Posted on 12/30/24 at 4:17 pm to wadewilson
quote:
When, specifically, did he give an exact number of how many OL we were getting in the portal
When specifically did I say he gave an exact number of OL guys?
I said he gave a number of guys. I didn't specify OL in that part of the statement.
It's fricking tiring dealing with you people. You either don't or can't read and then get your panties in a wad about some perceived wrongness.
Just go ahead and pretend you somehow "won" this discussion, which you should be fine with since you seem to keep pretending I've said things I haven't. I'm fricking done.
Posted on 12/30/24 at 4:21 pm to ProjectP2294
quote:
When specifically did I say he gave an exact number of OL guys?
I said he gave a number of guys. I didn't specify OL in that part of the statement.
Oh, I see.
quote:
He said we're taking a specific number of guys. We're at that number and now says we're not done taking OL guys.
You're trying to be cute and play semantics.
If you wanna bitch about Brian Kelly, or Brad Davis, or anything at all, go off queen. Just don't pretend like he said something he didn't say.
Posted on 12/30/24 at 4:22 pm to ProjectP2294
quote:
It's fricking tiring dealing with you people.

Posted on 12/30/24 at 4:28 pm to wadewilson
quote:
If you wanna bitch about Brian Kelly, or Brad Davis, or anything at all, go off queen.
I didn't bitch about anything. I even defended Davis a little bit in this thread. But again, you're too fricking dumb to understand anything I've said. And like the apparent child you are, you lash out in anger at the things you don't understand.
quote:
Just don't pretend like he said something he didn't say.
I didn't. But you definitely have continued to pretend I've said things in this thread that I didn't.
Posted on 12/30/24 at 4:30 pm to ProjectP2294

Calm down, sweetheart.
Posted on 12/30/24 at 4:34 pm to ProjectP2294
quote:
He said we're taking a specific number of guys. We're at that number and now says we're not done taking OL guys. The only thing that has happened in the interim between those statements is additional practice and eval time
15 practices does not sway a coach one way or the other. This isn’t NCAA 25 lol.
Posted on 12/30/24 at 4:39 pm to vidtiger23
quote:
15 practices does not sway a coach one way or the other. This isn’t NCAA 25 lol.
This is even dumber than what the other retard was saying.
Posted on 12/30/24 at 4:42 pm to ProjectP2294
He wants more experience available. We have lots of talent at these positions but not a lot of experience.
Posted on 12/30/24 at 4:43 pm to ProjectP2294
quote:Or, he has the money, no more real pressing needs outside of safety, and would rather make the OL depth as good as possible.
If he's making that comment after 15 bowl practices, they don't feel good about the development of some of the young guys on the roster.
Right now it would be
LT - Adams, Bordelon
LG - Thompson/Curne/Mubenga
C Moore, Echols
RG - Chester, Thomas
RT - Davis/Thompson, Bordelon
I don't think guys like Williams, Lee, and Calloway are ready to contribute yet. Those are your emergency depth guys right now.
As of right now you are looking at 10 guys likely to be the 2 deep. Of that 2 deep, 2 of them are true freshman. Getting one more guy for a year, knocks these guys down so your immediate backups at guard aren't true freshmen.
ETA: I don't know why i thought the transfer guy was named Johnson.
This post was edited on 12/30/24 at 5:00 pm
Posted on 12/30/24 at 4:44 pm to Datbayoubengal
quote:
Or, he has the money, no more real pressing needs outside of safety, and would rather make the OL depth as good as possible.
I don't think it's "or". I think it's "and".
ETA: I mentioned it in response to another post earlier in the thread. The 15 practices for the bowl, which are primarily used as an evaluation period, allowed him to see which or how many guys aren't ready to contribute next year.
This post was edited on 12/30/24 at 4:47 pm
Popular
Back to top
