Started By
Message

re: If we don’t sign another RB in this class,

Posted on 1/5/20 at 4:56 pm to
Posted by The First Cut
Member since Apr 2012
14012 posts
Posted on 1/5/20 at 4:56 pm to
quote:

But he has to weigh what happened vs Oklahoma vs what happened the other 13 games. He has to know the other guys are set to be 1-2


If there’s only three RBs on the roster, I don’t see anyone leaving. You’ll get touches with only three and the incumbent starter gone.
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
278748 posts
Posted on 1/5/20 at 5:04 pm to
Don’t know what?
Posted by Indiana Tiger
Member since Feb 2005
4057 posts
Posted on 1/5/20 at 5:11 pm to
quote:

Why sign somebody that you know will likely never play.

quote:

Because you absolutely need the depth. You cannot go into a season with 3 scholarship backs.


I think more people on here are more obsessed with a number than actual depth. Getting someone who has little chance to positively contribute his first year is not really depth. Look to the roster. Tory Carter. Ask him to lose a little weight to improve his speed. Knows the offense could be your #4. Try out Devonta Lee. Has the size and speed, knows the receiving offense and could be readier quicker. What about the walkons? How do they look? Could one be your emergency backup?

If you don't like the answers and you're concerned about depth, then you should be looking at JC and grad transfers to get someone who could contribute quicker. The problems is, ironically, that they would probably be turned off by our depth.

Not against a running back, but he should be someone who could make a quality contribution right away. Not being an EE will make that difficult for many recruits at our level of competition, so we shouldn't be afraid of looking internally.
Posted by Good Times
Hill top in Tn
Member since Nov 2007
23523 posts
Posted on 1/5/20 at 5:35 pm to
That Curry will be back to No 3 rb next year.

Clyde was not supposed to play before our new stars.

IMHO. might consider using those letters.
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
278748 posts
Posted on 1/5/20 at 6:00 pm to
I don’t use imho when it’s something I’d bet on
Posted by boxcar willie
kenner
Member since Mar 2011
16036 posts
Posted on 1/5/20 at 6:35 pm to
we dont need to waste a scolly on a RB who will likely never be a starter. If it is just for depth, how much depth does a very average true freshman give you anyway? We have guys already on the team (Carter and Kirkland) that would give better quality depth for the 2020 season and can shoot for a couple RB's in the next class that are difference makers
Posted by Good Times
Hill top in Tn
Member since Nov 2007
23523 posts
Posted on 1/5/20 at 6:46 pm to
Unfortunately for you, that’s all it is, your opinion. If you want to follow your hunch, go lay a bet and we can meet in a thread next year to see how good your opinions are.
This post was edited on 1/5/20 at 6:48 pm
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
39679 posts
Posted on 1/6/20 at 7:38 am to
quote:

RB is the one it is easiest to get a freshman serviceable for in a pinch.


I think this is true of most offenses, but not ours. If the RB is either running the ball or executing play-action 90% of the time it's easy to pick up the offense. That's not the case with our offense. The RB is having to make pre-snap reads. That's why our best RB is fourth on the depth chart.
Posted by cra_cra
Member since Nov 2016
1743 posts
Posted on 1/6/20 at 7:48 am to
quote:

This isnt NCAA 14 where guys don't get hurt and you can get by with limited numbers. We saw this year that "freshmen can come in and play" isn't always true. Sure they can take a few carries but in this offense if they can't catch or pass protect they aren't ready. TDP and Emery are more talented than any back we will bringing this class, aside from Evans, and they weren't and still aren't ready for a major load.

Moving guys from another position puts in a position like Texas was in most of the year. That's not good roster management. It also hurts depth at the position you take the player from.


Great post! Perhaps boxcar should actually think before he posts.
Posted by cra_cra
Member since Nov 2016
1743 posts
Posted on 1/6/20 at 7:56 am to
quote:

we dont need to waste a scolly on a RB who will likely never be a starter. If it is just for depth, how much depth does a very average true freshman give you anyway?


No one is advocating "wasting" a scholarship. What we are advocating is bringing in a really good back. Remember Brossette and Williams, and how "they" would never be starters? Just how important were they in their senior years? And Williams in the NFL now.

This takes a lot of vision and experience to understand and as others have said its about continuing the line of development and roster management. The what if's in a year or two or three, and injury management.

Ex. Price goes down for the year, and then Emory gets banged up in a game and is out a game or two (which happens a lot to players). We have one guy at that point.
This post was edited on 1/6/20 at 9:48 am
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
278748 posts
Posted on 1/6/20 at 11:15 am to
quote:

Unfortunately for you, that’s all it is, your opinion. If you want to follow your hunch, go lay a bet and we can meet in a thread next year to see how good your opinions are.



Do you think curry leads the team in carries next year?
Posted by Pipedream
Member since Nov 2019
1231 posts
Posted on 1/6/20 at 11:18 am to
I think if we only have 3 RBs we could potentially use some WRs as as pseudoRB if needed.
Posted by joechristoppher77
Ruston
Member since Apr 2006
5321 posts
Posted on 1/6/20 at 11:19 am to
I think it's Davis-Price for the most snaps based on how he seemed to pick up the offense, in particular pass pro. As far as carries, I've no clue, could be week to week based on practice
Posted by boxcar willie
kenner
Member since Mar 2011
16036 posts
Posted on 1/6/20 at 12:33 pm to
Brossette and Williams werent just space fillers. Brossette was one of the most prolific RB's in La. high school history and Williams was a big bruising physical speciman of a high school RB who is now in the NFL. All Im saying is that if all we can sign is a lesser quality back than usual LSU quality at the position, then save the spot for next year. We have other better options already on the team for this year
Posted by lsupicker
Member since Oct 2015
1292 posts
Posted on 1/6/20 at 12:58 pm to
I think the staff is on top of this and probably have it covered already so not worried at all
Posted by Datbayoubengal
Port City
Member since Sep 2009
26707 posts
Posted on 1/6/20 at 1:56 pm to
quote:

Brossette and Williams werent just space fillers. Brossette was one of the most prolific RB's in La. high school history and Williams was a big bruising physical speciman of a high school RB who is now in the NFL. All Im saying is that if all we can sign is a lesser quality back than usual LSU quality at the position, then save the spot for next year. We have other better options already on the team for this year



Exactly. They just want any back for depth purposes which is idiotic. I'd rather a guy already on the team that has experience and can pick up the pass blocking and reads quicker (see how Curry started out of nowhere). I'd rather look to another position to grab a guy that isn't really being used. Devonte Lee or Tory Carter would be my pick. Honestly they'd only be used for relief at that point anyway. You plan for stuff to happen, not complete catastrophe. That's why the average school only roles with 3 deep at most positions.

In LSU's worst injury year for RBs we lost Murphy preseason, Scott against Bama, and then Keiland against La Tech I think. That's when we were down to Ridley and swiss army knife Holliday. Nothing like that has ever come close to happening again.
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
278748 posts
Posted on 1/6/20 at 3:55 pm to
quote:

They just want any back for depth purposes which is idiotic.


It’s not just about that lol. It’s about ideal roster construction not just for this year but for the next few

Just like any other recruit. They don’t sign every kid to play right away
Posted by Hot Carl
Prayers up for 3
Member since Dec 2005
59334 posts
Posted on 1/7/20 at 7:04 am to
quote:

Do you think curry leads the team in carries next year?


Probably not, but he’s not transferring. He redshirted last year, got very few carries this year, I can’t see him willingly sitting out his 3rd year while he transfers. Especially with our lack of depth and his playing time against OU. If he ever leaves, it will likely be as a grad transfer where he won’t have to sit.
Posted by Dudebro2
San Diego
Member since Dec 2011
8967 posts
Posted on 1/7/20 at 4:06 pm to
quote:

Thanks for the ok, we can all sleep tonight


Always there to help my fellow brethren Tigah's

Posted by Dudebro2
San Diego
Member since Dec 2011
8967 posts
Posted on 1/7/20 at 4:10 pm to
quote:

We’re going to sign another RB. I think it’s important to do so this year. It MAY not hurt us next year but I’d like not to take that chance.


I agree with you, but at this point with the success that LSU has had under O and considering the year we had we don't need to settle for "a RB" if there isn't a truly elite back that we can sign. Instead use that scholly for another prime time playa and wait until next year their are some serious quality RB's in the 2021 class priority should be to sign 2 or 3 next year.

Emery & TDP are here until 2021 unless they transfer so just load up next year if we can't get the elite back this year.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram