Started By
Message

re: I think Walker Howard > Arch Manning

Posted on 10/26/20 at 4:05 pm to
Posted by thunderbird1100
GSU Eagles fan
Member since Oct 2007
70808 posts
Posted on 10/26/20 at 4:05 pm to
quote:

Manning is going to Ole Miss for sure.


You have no clue where he is going

quote:

I'm firmly in the stance of you need an athletic pocket passer in modern NCAA. Name me a team that has won the NC the past decade who didn't have a super athletic QB?


Alabama 2015 - Jake Coker
Alabama 2012 - AJ McCarron
Alabama 2011 - AJ McCarron

quote:

Guys like Brennan don't cut it anymore


Are you serious? The guy has had one of the best starts in LSU history at QB, this is ridiculous
Posted by TexasTiger88
Madisonville
Member since Jun 2010
1845 posts
Posted on 10/26/20 at 4:18 pm to
quote:

Name me a team that has won the NC the past decade who didn't have a super athletic QB?


Alabama is the only one I can think of. But they are the exception not the rule.
Posted by deuce985
Member since Feb 2008
27660 posts
Posted on 10/26/20 at 4:25 pm to
Brennan also shows you why he's limited. Wait until LSU plays a half decent defense. You already see it in the games he doesn't have the athleticism to extend plays. He can't move around in the pocket, they blitz, he's dead to rights. This is largely a reason we've struggled on 3rd downs. When he takes off to run he can't extend plays either. He just doesn't have it athleticism wise.

Athletic QBs who can extend plays are modern football now. They're being raised to be very good pocket passers on top of their athleticism. Dual threat QBs look different than QBs we saw 15 years ago. Finley looked better than Brennan did all season on 3rd down and it's largely due to his athleticism. Not saying he's better than Brennan right now but it shows you why you need that attribute for a QB especially on a shitty oline.

I don't care how good your oline is they're going to struggle at some point. Having a guy who can move around and extend plays makes a world of difference compared to a guy who's a hitting dummy in the pocket. The Burrows and Mahomes are modern football now. You're seeing more and more polished dual threat QBs coming out of HS.

*edit* I seem to remember Mccarron being fairly athletic no? Maybe I'm remember wrong. I know he was a pocket passer but didn't he have the ability to move around and extend plays?
This post was edited on 10/26/20 at 4:30 pm
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
285048 posts
Posted on 10/26/20 at 4:32 pm to
I agree with your premise. I think you need a Qb that can run for a few hundred yards in a season, at the least. I’m not sure Finley is that guy tho either tbh
Posted by Sampson
Drusilla and Jefferson
Member since Mar 2012
24968 posts
Posted on 10/26/20 at 4:36 pm to
I don’t know what you’re using to measure mobility but Brennan’s 40 time was 4.74 as a senior at the elite 11. That’s faster than Finley’s (4.85) and as good or better than half the starting QBs in the NFL right now.


ETA: and I’m genuinely asking what metric do people use to gauge that? Or is just sheer live play?
This post was edited on 10/26/20 at 4:39 pm
Posted by Sampson
Drusilla and Jefferson
Member since Mar 2012
24968 posts
Posted on 10/26/20 at 4:41 pm to
And perhaps Brennan’s speed has slowed a touch since he put on 30-40 pounds since then but again IDK. I just don’t see this vast gap in mobility from Brennan to Finley. And again half the starters in the league run much closer to a 5 than a 4.5.
This post was edited on 10/26/20 at 4:42 pm
Posted by deuce985
Member since Feb 2008
27660 posts
Posted on 10/26/20 at 4:42 pm to
Maybe not but he at least has way more athleticism in the pocket to where he can move around and extend a play. He doesn't necessarily have to use his legs to run for tons of yards. It's nice to have but it's more about not being a statue in the pocket.

When Brennan runs it looks UGLY. It's almost embarrassing at the spin moves and everything he tries to do and gets whacked. He has played well but he definitely doesn't have the ability to extend plays with his athleticism.

All I'm saying is if LSU is recruiting pocket passers they need athleticism. Howard and Nuss have athleticism. Brennan does not but that's not a O recruit. It's even easier now to find true dual threats that have great passing ability too.
This post was edited on 10/26/20 at 4:46 pm
Posted by thunderbird1100
GSU Eagles fan
Member since Oct 2007
70808 posts
Posted on 10/26/20 at 4:46 pm to
quote:

Brennan also shows you why he's limited


Brennan hasnt shown anything to say he's "limited" yet. Again he's basically re-writing the records books here among his first 3 starts so far.

quote:

You already see it in the games he doesn't have the athleticism to extend plays.


Maybe in game 1, not so much in games 2 and 3 or you werent paying attention. He even tore his abdominal against Missouri early the game and still threw for 430 yards and 4 TD making plays left and right, that shows a lot.

quote:

This is largely a reason we've struggled on 3rd downs.


The biggest reason we've struggled on 3rd downs is play calling by far.

quote:

Finley looked better than Brennan did all season on 3rd down and it's largely due to his athleticism.


You're using a 1 game sample size with a simplified play book, almost zero pass rush against Finley and quick throws for most part, not exactly apples to apples.

quote:

I don't care how good your oline is they're going to struggle at some point.


How do you know Finley will be so good when things break down considering the only sample size we have of him is 1 game where literally South Carolina was credited with 0 sacks, 1 hit on QB and 3 total pressures per PFF? Being good against pressure is not something guys usually naturally do right out the gate, it's something you learn over time. Burrow was sh*t against pressure in 2018 and really good against it in 2019.

quote:

I seem to remember Mccarron being fairly athletic no?


You said, and I quoted BEFORE you deleted it now:
quote:

Name me a team that has won the NC the past decade who didn't have a super athletic QB?


There's no one on the planet who would argue Coker or McCarron were "super athletic" QBs for Alabama nor even remotely really athletic for a QB. McCarron ran a 5 second 40 and had like a 28" vertical at the combine. Despite throwing for 9k yards and had a ridiculous 77 TD to 15 INT ratio in college his testing numbers were meh at best and went in the 5th round and is a career clipboard holder in the NFL.
This post was edited on 10/26/20 at 4:48 pm
Posted by Bjorn Cyborg
Member since Sep 2016
32031 posts
Posted on 10/26/20 at 4:59 pm to
quote:

Name me a team that has won the NC the past decade who didn't have a super athletic QB?


Florida State - Jameis Winston

The already mentioned Alabama titles.

So, 4 out of 10.

Nice theory.
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
285048 posts
Posted on 10/26/20 at 5:09 pm to
He’s not wrong. Look at the QBs that have been in the playoffs. There is a clear pattern
Posted by Bjorn Cyborg
Member since Sep 2016
32031 posts
Posted on 10/26/20 at 5:37 pm to
I don't think it's ever been preferable to have a big stiff at QB. But the categories are getting cloudy to where Joe Burrow and Trevor Lawrence are getting lumped in with Vince Young and Jalen Hurts as running quarterbacks.

Sure they are athletic and mobile, but they run just enough to keep the defense honest.
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
285048 posts
Posted on 10/26/20 at 5:41 pm to
Lawrence ran for 500yards & 9 TDs last year

Burrow ran for 368 & 5 TD. Take away his sack yardage & he was over 500
Posted by Bjorn Cyborg
Member since Sep 2016
32031 posts
Posted on 10/26/20 at 5:46 pm to
Burrow and Lawrence also played 15 games. The term "duel threat" is thrown around a lot and has difference meanings to different people. It's subjective.

I consider Johnny Manziel to be a duel threat. Same with Jalen Hurts.

I consider Burrow and Lawrence to be athletic pocket passers who can run if needed.

The doesn't fit into the neat and tidy DT/PP binary, but oh well.

I consider Myles Brennan and Tj Finley to be pure pocket passers. People keep posting that Finley is a running threat. I think he looked awkward running the ball and at his height is going to get hurt.
Posted by Elleshoe
Wade’s World
Member since Jun 2004
143642 posts
Posted on 10/26/20 at 5:53 pm to
quote:

and at his height is going to get hurt.



Wat
Posted by Bjorn Cyborg
Member since Sep 2016
32031 posts
Posted on 10/26/20 at 5:55 pm to
He looked awkward and gangley running the ball. He's going to get his legs chopped out from under him and get hurt.
Posted by Elleshoe
Wade’s World
Member since Jun 2004
143642 posts
Posted on 10/26/20 at 6:13 pm to
That’s a ridiculous statement
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
285048 posts
Posted on 10/26/20 at 6:18 pm to
You want to recruit SS. Those guys are SS.

Brennan is a 3B.

Finley is too.
Posted by burreauxxx
Member since Dec 2019
5249 posts
Posted on 10/26/20 at 6:19 pm to
I actually agree at the moment although they're both so young especially Arch

Nuss and Walker are legit impressive. Best run of QBs by far LSU has recruited in a long time, whether they actually turn out to be or not. But you have to feel good that some will
Posted by deuce985
Member since Feb 2008
27660 posts
Posted on 10/26/20 at 6:19 pm to
Do you see them calling designed QB runs for Brennan? You have your answer.
Posted by japes3
Member since Sep 2020
25 posts
Posted on 10/26/20 at 6:37 pm to
Eli Holstein transferred so he could play. Probably all you need to know
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram