- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Christine Michael - myth or mistake?
Posted on 6/22/09 at 6:13 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 6/22/09 at 6:13 am to SlowFlowPro
DD told me last year that the coaches thought CM was a soft runner ....so the interest was not all there from LSU's stand point...
DD said, a player who runs soft in HS most likely will always be a soft runner...
I found these comments interesting, and may explain his strange recruitment....Did Texas even off this young man?
He seems to be a top character guy IMO..from I have read on him..
DD said, a player who runs soft in HS most likely will always be a soft runner...
I found these comments interesting, and may explain his strange recruitment....Did Texas even off this young man?
He seems to be a top character guy IMO..from I have read on him..
Posted on 6/22/09 at 6:57 am to SlowFlowPro
settle? on a message board?
For the record: BIG MISTAKE, but I'm not bitchin
For the record: BIG MISTAKE, but I'm not bitchin
Posted on 6/22/09 at 7:32 am to Slinger16
quote:
Maybe the coaches thought that Pratt was a batter fit than Michael. Obviously if they had known what was going to happen, Michael would've gotten the offer over Pratt.
if we wanted michael, we would have at least offered him post-pratt. we didn't
Posted on 6/22/09 at 7:34 am to ApexTiger
quote:
Did Texas even off this young man?
no, but he wasn't a "texas guy," so thats why
they didn't offer loston either until late possibly
Posted on 6/22/09 at 8:24 am to ApexTiger
quote:
Did Texas even off this young man?
no, and neither did OU
Posted on 6/22/09 at 9:14 am to ColtsTigers
quote:
I think they had 3 RBs committed (including Calhoun), and felt that they had a great shot for Lache. So yeah, if we don't get Lache, it was a mistake.
I think it's a mistake no matter how you look at it. Either guarantee Michael last year or hope to Lache this year. I'd rather a guaranteed Michael than a probably Lache. And now that it looks like Lache won't be coming, well...
Posted on 6/22/09 at 9:15 am to chinese58
quote:
no, but he wasn't a "texas guy,"
Wrong!
Texas and LSU are like my favorites so far," Michael said. "The reason for that, I know when it comes down to pick colleges, it's going to be hard, but I don't want to be too far from home. I want to be within driving distance.
"I like Texas because for the past couple of years, they've been producing good running backs like Priest Holmes, Ricky Williams, (Cedric) Benson and Jamaal Charles. I'd like to follow in that history. And LSU, I just like them because they're a big name."
"It's just A&M, Texas and LSU," he said. "I want to stay close to home and those are the three schools that really fit everything I'm looking for. Mississippi State came down for me and Miami too but those schools I'm not really interested in."
"It's still open. I still like UT. That's my number one school but after I got more letters I've started to think about others," Michael said. "But right now, UT is still my number one school. LSU is probably number two, and then I'd probably say Texas A&M."
He wanted to go to Texas we wanted Whaley more. Whaley had Gilbert and Whaley 1A and 1B We were only taking 1 back.
Posted on 6/22/09 at 9:40 am to SlowFlowPro
Great thread.
I am totally happy with Ford and Calhoun.
Ford's video is encouraging for LSU's future at RB.
And if I am right, I think Calhoun will be a guy that LSU will see a lot of at some kind of RB or slot/speedy back position.....pleasant surprise?
It is crazy how we are CURRENTLY having trouble signing a 'speed back' though.
But it is not all said and done. Hopefully we will get Seastruk or Dyer (though they are not at all similar).
If you look at our RB depth NEXT year.
We are good with:
Murphy
Ridley (we have so many FB's that he should be an RB...plus he's had some positive mop up duty- hell, Ally Broussard couldn't do that)
Ford
Calhoun (read on the rant where he is up to 190 lbs -still a frosh too)
FB's
Dugas
Theriot
Allen
Worle
I am totally happy with Ford and Calhoun.
Ford's video is encouraging for LSU's future at RB.
And if I am right, I think Calhoun will be a guy that LSU will see a lot of at some kind of RB or slot/speedy back position.....pleasant surprise?
It is crazy how we are CURRENTLY having trouble signing a 'speed back' though.
But it is not all said and done. Hopefully we will get Seastruk or Dyer (though they are not at all similar).
If you look at our RB depth NEXT year.
We are good with:
Murphy
Ridley (we have so many FB's that he should be an RB...plus he's had some positive mop up duty- hell, Ally Broussard couldn't do that)
Ford
Calhoun (read on the rant where he is up to 190 lbs -still a frosh too)
FB's
Dugas
Theriot
Allen
Worle
This post was edited on 6/22/09 at 9:47 am
Posted on 6/22/09 at 9:54 am to TigerBait45
quote:I think it was more about Michael than either of those guys.
I think it was probably about Trent Richardson more than Seastrunk.
Posted on 6/22/09 at 10:20 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
LET'S SETTLE THIS ONCE AND FOR ALL
How? Nobody on here knows for sure which it was. Nothing will be settled.
That said, this is always a good topic.
Posted on 6/22/09 at 10:31 am to Texaswill
quote:
He wanted to go to Texas
you misunderstood what i meant
texas has their guys. he wasn't one. he wasn't recruited
mack can be weird about that (see: terrence tolliver)
Posted on 6/22/09 at 10:33 am to SlowFlowPro
I think it was just a strong running back year and Michael was overrated by the recruiting services. Simple as that. If he was as good as they said he was, UT, LSU, and OU would have been all over him.
Posted on 6/22/09 at 11:39 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
texas has their guys. he wasn't one. he wasn't recruited
So that means Mack/UT wasn't that impressed with his running ability?? Maybe Mack, Stoops, and Miles had the same opinion of this kid??
If UT, LSU, and OU passed on him then it seems like maybe this kid was overrated by Rivals.
This post was edited on 6/22/09 at 11:40 am
Posted on 6/22/09 at 11:43 am to STEVED00
quote:
So that means Mack/UT wasn't that impressed with his running ability?
i think he just didn't jump when mack said jump early in the process
stoops not offering is a question mark. he offers a bunch of good/solid (not great) RBs to bump his stars
Posted on 6/22/09 at 11:49 am to SlowFlowPro
how can it be a mistake whenever the kid hasn't even stepped foot on a college field yet?
Posted on 6/22/09 at 11:51 am to SlowFlowPro
I get the whole UT pressure its recruits into early commitments philosophy, but I still find it hard to believe they would pass on a 5* guy just bc they didn't want to engage in a recruiting battle. I can see that philosophy on 4/3* guys but not 5* unless said 5* was overrated by the recruiting services.
Plus its pretty clear that Miles prefers "physical" RBs over pure finesse/speed guys so that would definitely support the theory of Pratt/TR/Ford over CM.
Plus its pretty clear that Miles prefers "physical" RBs over pure finesse/speed guys so that would definitely support the theory of Pratt/TR/Ford over CM.
This post was edited on 6/22/09 at 11:58 am
Posted on 6/22/09 at 11:54 am to Prominentwon
quote:
how can it be a mistake whenever the kid hasn't even stepped foot on a college field yet?
LSU basically turning down a 5* prospect I assume. You wouldn't think that would happen unless the coaches felt he was overrated. Most colleges would gladly take a very very talented player (5*) even if they had a stockpile of strong players at that position.
Posted on 6/22/09 at 11:59 am to Prominentwon
quote:
how can it be a mistake whenever the kid hasn't even stepped foot on a college field yet?
IF we held out his schollie for richardson and/or lache, and we get neither, it would be a mistake
that's what "mistake" means
"myth" means that this situation never existed and we never wanted him at all
Posted on 6/22/09 at 12:00 pm to STEVED00
quote:
I get the whole UT pressure its recruits into early commitments philosophy, but I still find it hard to believe they would pass on a 5* guy just bc they didn't want to engage in a recruiting battle. I can see that philosophy on 4/3* guys but not 5* unless said 5* was overrated by the recruiting services.
ask terrance tolliver about this
Posted on 6/22/09 at 12:03 pm to SlowFlowPro
Michael sounds like a mama's boy. He wanted to stay close to home. So it was always LSU, UT, or Aggy. I think OU maybe even was too far from him.
So SFP is right. If we don't get Lache, LSU screwed up here.
So SFP is right. If we don't get Lache, LSU screwed up here.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News