- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 30 + 29 + 28 + 32 = 85 (The practice of oversigning)
Posted on 2/7/10 at 5:27 am to OldManRiver
Posted on 2/7/10 at 5:27 am to OldManRiver
quote:
We all know that every year coaches in the SEC sign 1-2 kids per class(or more) that they know have 0% chance of qualifying, but want the opportunity to forge a relationship and help place them in a friendly JUCO. No current player is displaced in that scenario, but it's going to be counted as "oversigning".
+1
I haven't really thought about all the repercussions of this, but, what about allowing scholarships that do not count against the team limit for guys that are cut but wish to continue their education at that school?
I also dislike the sit out rule for transfers.
Posted on 2/7/10 at 7:20 am to Atari
There's way too much money involved with college football for anyone to not think of it in terms of a business. Recruiting is just one aspect of this business, and it isn't always fair to eveyone involved in it.
Personally, I think there's a lot to learn for the 17 and 18 year olds that partake in the recruitment process on their way to being college students - especially if they're planning on studying business.
This country has always been this way and will continue to be this way so long as B.O.'s approval rating continues to drop and democrats continue to lose seats in the house and the senate.
The one thing everyone should note, first and foremost, when it comes to overrecruiting is that those teams WIN.

Personally, I think there's a lot to learn for the 17 and 18 year olds that partake in the recruitment process on their way to being college students - especially if they're planning on studying business.
This country has always been this way and will continue to be this way so long as B.O.'s approval rating continues to drop and democrats continue to lose seats in the house and the senate.
The one thing everyone should note, first and foremost, when it comes to overrecruiting is that those teams WIN.
Posted on 2/7/10 at 9:48 am to Atari
Didn't read everything, but I agree that the website has a huge slant against the SEC.
If a program takes the signing only 21 a year approach that coach should be fired. You have to plan for academic and athletic casualties. Plain and Simple.
If a program takes the signing only 21 a year approach that coach should be fired. You have to plan for academic and athletic casualties. Plain and Simple.
Posted on 2/7/10 at 9:50 am to Dodd
quote:
Dodd
Do you read your comments? I just noticed the other day how much shite people talk about you there but they talk as if they have read every article you have ever written
Posted on 2/7/10 at 9:51 am to LSUpsychWARD
It's the reason I keep on keeping on. I love to throw gas on fires
Posted on 2/7/10 at 9:56 am to Dodd
quote:
It's the reason I keep on keeping on. I love to throw gas on fires
Take it from me, it's hilarious and you sometimes throw out a gem. I like to post on your comments once in a while to stoke the fires for you.
Posted on 2/7/10 at 10:23 am to offdacorner
quote:
So you would take a scholarship from a kid just because he wasn't as good as you thought he'd be?
Yes, I personally don't have a problem with it for the following reasons:
1. Schools like LSU and Alabama are in it to win it, and the fans have no one to blame but themselves in this respect.
2. The kid can still go to school if he wants, just like any other kid out there. It's not like he's all the sudden told "you're cut, you cannot go to school and get an education." The only difference is his education is not getting paid for by the athletic department. And honestly, if he's not contributing to the football team, why does the kid deserve to get his education paid?
3. The kid can still get a scholarship if there's a another school out there that wants him.
4. I'd be willing to bet there is a large percentage of football player that WOULD NOT go to school anyway if it wasn't for football. So for those players, what does this change?
5. The kids know all this going in.
All that said, I'm not "blind" to the other side of this argument. I see what you are saying, and understand your points that it is not "fair" to the kid in some respects. Nonetheless, me personally, I don't have a problem with it. It's the name of the game, and everyone (including the kids) know the rules going in and know the possible consequences.
This post was edited on 2/7/10 at 10:27 am
Posted on 2/7/10 at 10:57 am to JPLSU1981
LSU seems to lose players for one of three reasons, kid wants to to home, grades, rules violations. Of course the rules violations can be used to cover up almost anything, and any kid who is "cut" could cover himself by saying that he is leaving to get closer to home, but I really don't see LSU as being guilty of these practices. If anything, it looks like Miles is an honorable coach. We certainly haven't lost poor performers, in most cases, and when we have, the kids seem to have left on thier own initiative.
Posted on 2/7/10 at 11:03 am to DaveDoggy
quote:
DaveDoggy
quote:
This country has always been this way and will continue to be this way so long as B.O.'s approval rating continues to drop and democrats continue to lose seats in the house and the senate.
WTF? Poli board, a-hole.
Posted on 2/7/10 at 11:08 am to JPLSU1981
quote:
JPLSU1981
JP is seeing this issue most clearly. Athletic scholarships are given out primarily in the basis of pohysical skills just like academic scholarships are given out based on acedemic capability. Like the academic scholar, the athletic scholar who cannot keep up his end of the bargain runs the risk of losing his free ride.
BTW: when either scholar lose the free ride, they become just lke the rest of us.....Oh the horror!!!!
This post was edited on 2/7/10 at 11:09 am
Posted on 2/7/10 at 12:31 pm to Sid in Lakeshore
quote:
Athletic scholarships are given out primarily in the basis of physical skills just like academic scholarships are given out based on academic capability. Like the academic scholar, the athletic scholar who cannot keep up his end of the bargain runs the risk of losing his free ride.
This is an excellent point. A scholar usually must maintain a 3.0 GPA and some cases better to keep their scholarship.
Also this is not exactly anything new. I have read several players over the years say their scholarship was pulled so as to be given to someone else. An example, Rob Bironas who kicks for the Titans has his scholarship pulled when Tuberville started at Auburn because Tuberville does not give kickers scholarships. Bironas had been the team's kicker He was not cut but no longer had a free ride. He transferred.
"Bironas attended Auburn University where he was a semi-finalist for the Lou Groza Award in 1998 after making 12 of 16 field goal attempts (including two successful 49-yard (45 m) tries with the four misses from 40+) and making all 18 PATs for a team-high 54 points. The following season, new head coach Tommy Tuberville kicked the preseason All-SEC kicker off the football team and replaced Bironas with the punter, Damon Duval.[1][2] Bironas later transferred to Georgia Southern University, where his brother was on the soccer team, for his final year of collegiate eligibility. While with the Eagles, Bironas won the 2000 NCAA Division I-AA National Championship, before returning to graduate from Auburn with a degree in marketing."
Posted on 2/7/10 at 1:19 pm to ValleyTiger
quote:
t. A scholar usually must maintain a 3.0 GPA and some cases better to keep their scholarship.
Yes and that what ever standards an academic scholarship requires are clearly spelled out before the kids accepts it.
If you are going to cut kids for not playing to whatever level you imagine is good enough then it needs to be spelled out before the kid signs that LOI.
In my mind if a guy shows up to practice, gives it his all, then regardless of how he turns out on the field he has fulfilled his end of the bargain. If his talent isn't good enough then it was the staff's fault for not doing a good enough job evaluating talent.
Posted on 2/7/10 at 2:31 pm to tigerguy121
quote:
In my mind if a guy shows up to practice, gives it his all, then regardless of how he turns out on the field he has fulfilled his end of the bargain.
My gut tells me that guys that do what you stated are not the ones who normally get "cut" ... I would guess that the unlucky kids that do eventually get "cut" (or whatever you want to call it) have done more to deserve that, whether it's grades, commitment, getting in trouble, bad attitude, or a combination of a lot of these things, etc, etc. Not to mention there is a good percentage of these kids that decide to leave on their own for lack of playing time, depth chart, etc. Also, most kids that are good enough to get a scholarship at LSU can easily get a scholarship at a smaller school to continue playing ball and getting their education paid for. Miles makes one call and the kid's gonna have a spot somewhere else.
I don't think there are many kids that do everything right on and off the field, have a great attitude, give it their all, and then LSU decides to yank their scholarship. I certainly don't know how many of these types we have had at LSU, but I'd bet the number is much closer to 0 than it is to 50 over the last 6 years under Miles.
The guys that we lose (RP, deas, Ricky Dixon, Odom, jarvis jones, etc, etc, etc) typically have a lot more factors involved in their departure. Point being, they weren't all great kids giving it their all on and off the field).
IMO, coaches should factor all of this into their recruiting. It is imperitive that they include the high probability that they will have guys leave the program for whatever reason into their recruiting philosophy. The shouldn't be signing 40 guys every year (and obviously can't now), but I believe the coaches should definitely oversign just about every year IMO to help with what should be EXPECTED: attrition.
this chart helps track where all our signees ended up... LINK...In the gray are kids that are no longer with the LSU program.
This post was edited on 2/7/10 at 2:51 pm
Posted on 2/7/10 at 3:00 pm to offdacorner
stimulating article.. Obviously there are serious recruiting issues here. But tweaking the system a little could make it fairer to player and school.
First, recognize that sports in the college setting is a $$$ business.
A) PLAYER
1) Player may transfer at any time for any reason within first two years to an out of conference school;
2) Debilitated player would receive equivalent scholarship dollars to peruse their education at that university or an instate school of their choice.
B) SCHOOL
1) Coach may eliminate a player"s scholarship for any reason in the first two years; However, the player may attend the school of their choice and participate in athletics.
2) Increase the total scholarships for football to 90 but not to exceed 28 new recruits in any given year.
3) At least 75% (e.i. 21 players ) of the 28 enrolled each year must graduate ( excludes players who turn professional ). If not, the school loses a scholarship for 2 years for every player that does not graduate in six years.
First, recognize that sports in the college setting is a $$$ business.
A) PLAYER
1) Player may transfer at any time for any reason within first two years to an out of conference school;
2) Debilitated player would receive equivalent scholarship dollars to peruse their education at that university or an instate school of their choice.
B) SCHOOL
1) Coach may eliminate a player"s scholarship for any reason in the first two years; However, the player may attend the school of their choice and participate in athletics.
2) Increase the total scholarships for football to 90 but not to exceed 28 new recruits in any given year.
3) At least 75% (e.i. 21 players ) of the 28 enrolled each year must graduate ( excludes players who turn professional ). If not, the school loses a scholarship for 2 years for every player that does not graduate in six years.
Posted on 2/7/10 at 3:23 pm to Atari
The link has been updated since I originally posted it.
And the link one more time: LINK
So it's not like Saban has 10 players he knows aren't cutting it so he went out and over recruited to fill their spots. If they were that bad they'd already be cut. No he's going to wait until after the spring game and decide "ok, these kids just aren't good enough and need to transfer". That's his fault for recruiting them he should have to eat that scholarship.
quote:
We promise that we are not picking on Nick Saban, the simple fact is that he oversigns players every single year and in order for new guys to come in existing guys gotta go.
This year's numbers are in and basically 9 (possibly 10) players have got to go between now and August.
Our goal is to chronicle every kill until the death march to 85 is complete.
As mentioned above, after taking classes of 25 & 32 his first two years, Saban has followed up with 27 & 28/9.
And the link one more time: LINK
So it's not like Saban has 10 players he knows aren't cutting it so he went out and over recruited to fill their spots. If they were that bad they'd already be cut. No he's going to wait until after the spring game and decide "ok, these kids just aren't good enough and need to transfer". That's his fault for recruiting them he should have to eat that scholarship.
This post was edited on 2/7/10 at 3:26 pm
Posted on 2/7/10 at 3:24 pm to JPLSU1981
quote:
My gut tells me that guys that do what you stated are not the ones who normally get "cut" .
You didn't limit it to guys with character problems what you said was.
quote:
So you would take a scholarship from a kid just because he wasn't as good as you thought he'd be? Yes, I personally don't have a problem with it
I disagree with that as I said earlier.
Posted on 2/7/10 at 5:55 pm to offdacorner
Saban is the one ABUSING this rule and it is pathetic, the way the lying weasel does it. Last year he forced out, cut, forced to quit football or transfer about 8 players in the July/August period. These were guys that went through spring training, and busted their arse, some for years for the program and Saban.
All because he wanted to oversign.
All because he wanted to oversign.
Posted on 2/7/10 at 8:57 pm to Tiger n Miami AU83
Well, although you are correct about Saban, Florida (28), LSU (29), and Auburn (32) all signed more players than Bama in 2010.
It's not just Saban. Like the article points out, it's the SEC in general.
It's not just Saban. Like the article points out, it's the SEC in general.
Posted on 2/7/10 at 9:14 pm to JPLSU1981
quote:LSU only signed 27 and two of those enrolled early.
Well, although you are correct about Saban, Florida (28), LSU (29), and Auburn (32) all signed more players than Bama in 2010.
Posted on 2/7/10 at 10:34 pm to XbengalTiger
quote:
LSU only signed 27 and two of those enrolled early.
But what did their budget allow for? It's not just about how many you sign per year, but also how many you have room for. I don't care if you sign 40, so long as you have scholarships for 40.
Popular
Back to top


0




