- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Please explain the rationale for anchoring a thread about a Paul Krugman article
Posted on 10/21/14 at 4:24 pm to Rex
Posted on 10/21/14 at 4:24 pm to Rex
The only rational explanation is that the boards moderators are Democrats and knew that there was nothing in that article that could make Obama look good.
0
Posted on 10/21/14 at 4:27 pm to Rex
I read Krugman every week. He's an idiot. But I'm into free speech. Let the Krugman's of the world have a place on this board. It's all about freedom.
Posted on 10/21/14 at 4:29 pm to Rex
quote:
but when a famous, respected and articulate economist
well, 1 out of 3 ain't bad
Posted on 10/21/14 at 4:40 pm to Rex
For starters, there is already a thread on this exact same topic.
Secondly, winning a Nobel prize does not make one all-knowing, nor does it excuse his personality and current partisanship. He isn't nearly as respected as Democrats make him out to be. That is a byproduct of his and his fans' partisanship.
And if you hold Nobel prizes in such high regard, let's not forget Black, Scholes, and Merton.
Secondly, winning a Nobel prize does not make one all-knowing, nor does it excuse his personality and current partisanship. He isn't nearly as respected as Democrats make him out to be. That is a byproduct of his and his fans' partisanship.
And if you hold Nobel prizes in such high regard, let's not forget Black, Scholes, and Merton.
This post was edited on 10/21/14 at 4:42 pm
Posted on 10/21/14 at 4:47 pm to Scruffy
quote:
And if you hold Nobel prizes in such high regard, let's not forget Black, Scholes, and Merton.
Not to mention, it's technically not a "Nobel" prize.
Posted on 10/21/14 at 4:49 pm to Reames239
quote:1. Different committee votes on that. 2. If presidents are responsible for collateral damage then the Reps are in trouble. 3. Republucans are blocking the close of Gitmo. Wait until he does it with an EO and you'll see some fireworks.
Obama is a Nobel peace prize winner and has droned a bunch of kids and kept humans detained at Guantanamo even though he said he would close it.
Posted on 10/21/14 at 4:50 pm to Scruffy
quote:completely your opinion and a good response for the thread except it's not here to respond to
Secondly, winning a Nobel prize does not make one all-knowing, nor does it excuse his personality and current partisanship. He isn't nearly as respected as Democrats make him out to be. That is a byproduct of his and his fans' partisanship.
Posted on 10/21/14 at 4:54 pm to Rex
What was the article about?
Posted on 10/21/14 at 4:57 pm to Rex
quote:
Rex
didn't read, just pressed the button on my shock collar
Posted on 10/21/14 at 5:11 pm to Rex
quote:
Nobel Prize
An award that really doesn't mean anything now. Obama won it and he's bombing countries left and right.
quote:
Rex
You probably love Krugman's Keynesian garbage.
Posted on 10/21/14 at 8:33 pm to Rex
quote:
This board has become a complete joke.
Then GTFO you attention whore.
Posted on 10/21/14 at 8:55 pm to Rex
I'm on your side Rex
It shouldn't have been anchored
It shouldn't have been anchored
Posted on 10/21/14 at 10:31 pm to Vegas Bengal
quote:
If presidents are responsible for collateral damage then the Reps are in trouble.
Because Bush did it.
You are an interesting woman. You show total emotion when the GOP does something, yet when Hope n Change does it, it's A-OK
fricking hack motherfricker. I bet you suck at driving a car.
Two weeks my lady.
Hope n Change = HOLY shite
Posted on 10/21/14 at 10:35 pm to baybeefeetz
quote:
What was the article about?
Obama has been a successful President, and his legacy is rock solid (in a good way).
It was anchored, I believe, because a known troll started it just to rile up the masses.
The troll should e banned, the OP article debated (not much to debate rationally) but either way...
Posted on 10/22/14 at 4:31 am to Wild Thang
quote:
It was anchored, I believe, because a known troll started it just to rile up the masses. The troll should e banned, the OP article debated (not much to debate rationally) but either way...
Interesting considering your post before this one, which by the way is par for the course with you:
quote:
Because Bush did it.
You are an interesting woman. You show total emotion when the GOP does something, yet when Hope n Change does it, it's A-OK
fricking hack motherfricker. I bet you suck at driving a car.
Two weeks my lady.
Hope n Change = HOLY shite
Posted on 10/22/14 at 7:25 pm to Rex
quote:Rex, I'm not sure what happened there. Someone RA'd the thread and evidently it was anchored in response to that RA, but I'm not sure what the rationale was. Fwiw, I agree with you that there seems to be no good reason for anchoring it.
Please explain the rationale for anchoring a thread about a Paul Krugman article
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News