Started By
Message

re: Stuck losing weight

Posted on 8/7/25 at 2:56 pm to
Posted by Shotgun Willie
Member since Apr 2016
4182 posts
Posted on 8/7/25 at 2:56 pm to
So far today I've already done 11K steps and as of now my calorie intake is only at 471, with 44 g of protein. I didn't eat until about 11:30 AM this morning, and just had a low car roll up for quick bite. Not overly hungry as of now. I'll keep tracking calories but I guarantee you I've been under. I know I need to start lifting weights to help.
Posted by tigercross
Member since Feb 2008
5060 posts
Posted on 8/7/25 at 3:53 pm to
quote:

I'll keep tracking calories but I guarantee you I've been under.


If you are no longer losing weight, I guarantee you have not been in a caloric deficit.
Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
39746 posts
Posted on 8/7/25 at 4:22 pm to
quote:

I'll keep tracking calories but I guarantee you I've been under


I don't mean this in a rude way, but I can probably assure you that you aren't. I'm betting there is something that isn't being factored in when you are calculating your calories eaten, be it sauces or incorrect measurement of ingredients, etc. It is an extremely common thing to happen.

Now, it's normal to have some brief pauses. Things will fluctuate so if its only been a short amount of time and you've fluctuated around the same number and you are confident you are still in a good deficit to be losing 1-2lbs a week, it will probably jump down a significant amount soon. Could be holding more water than normal or other things. However, if we are talking you haven't had any movement in a month or so now, then you aren't in a deficit anymore.
This post was edited on 8/7/25 at 4:26 pm
Posted by TheDrunkenTigah
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2011
18155 posts
Posted on 8/7/25 at 7:54 pm to
quote:

today I've already done 11K steps


I would invest in a more accurate step tracker and a food scale and be amazed at how this all figures itself out.
Posted by Reubaltaich
A nation under duress
Member since Jun 2006
5398 posts
Posted on 8/7/25 at 8:14 pm to
quote:

veggies, fruit


Check out the glycemic index(GI) of these.

We want to go with foods, with a low GI.

Vegetables that have a high GI:
Potatoes, Corn, Peas, White rice, Carrots, Sweet potatoes...

Vegetables that have a low GI:
Broccoli, Cauliflower, Cucumbers...

Fruits that have a high GI:
Bananas, pineapple, grapes, watermelon...

Fruits that have a low GI:
Apples, cherries, grapefruit...

Now there is a sneaky little trick that big ag, especially in the fruit industries has done.

They have genetically modified their fruits(even some vegetables) to contain even more sugar, to get us even more addicted to their 'produce'.


Posted by pwejr88
Red Stick
Member since Apr 2007
37614 posts
Posted on 8/7/25 at 10:21 pm to
quote:

I'll keep tracking calories but I guarantee you I've been under.


Wrong or you would be losing weight.

Burning more calories than you consume will 100% of the time result in weight loss. Science
Posted by SallysHuman
Lady Palmetto Bug
Member since Jan 2025
15029 posts
Posted on 8/8/25 at 10:01 am to
quote:

This is a good calculator that 777 posted a while back. I keep it bookmarked


Well... I just found out why I'm still fat. To lose weight I need 1210cal per day. **sigh**
Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
39746 posts
Posted on 8/8/25 at 11:04 am to
That seems very low.
Posted by SallysHuman
Lady Palmetto Bug
Member since Jan 2025
15029 posts
Posted on 8/8/25 at 11:05 am to
quote:

That seems very low.


I'm short, chunky, female and sedentary.
Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
39746 posts
Posted on 8/8/25 at 11:13 am to
Well, increase that activity then and the calories will go up

Posted by SallysHuman
Lady Palmetto Bug
Member since Jan 2025
15029 posts
Posted on 8/8/25 at 11:21 am to
quote:

Well, increase that activity then and the calories will go up


I know... it's hard though- I'll get there one day. Maybe.
Posted by Mingo Was His NameO
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2016
37386 posts
Posted on 8/8/25 at 11:21 am to
quote:

it's hard though


No it’s not
Posted by SallysHuman
Lady Palmetto Bug
Member since Jan 2025
15029 posts
Posted on 8/8/25 at 11:28 am to
quote:

No it’s not


Bite me, Mingo... it IS hard to go from fat and sedentary to fit and active. Not impossible, but it is hard.

I spent most of my life very fit and active- middle age and covid restrictions really effed my game and now I'm tired on top of and because of being fat and sedentary.

When I was fit, it WAS easy to stay that way. Truly was.
Posted by Tiger1984
Member since Aug 2024
17 posts
Posted on 8/8/25 at 11:37 am to
I’m a short female too (5’3”). The key for petite women is to put on muscle. The more muscle you have, the better your body is at being efficient. They say weight loss happens in the kitchen, and it’s totally true, but getting movement in and putting on lean mass is equally important, unless you want to starve at 1200 calories. I eat around 1700-1800 calories daily at 120lbs, but the reason I can eat more is because of my lean mass.

Put on muscle and you can eat more…it’s changed my entire diet perspective
Posted by MemphisGuy
Germantown, TN
Member since Nov 2023
13785 posts
Posted on 8/8/25 at 11:44 am to
quote:

Bite me, Mingo

You'd have to get him a step stool.
Posted by Mingo Was His NameO
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2016
37386 posts
Posted on 8/8/25 at 11:45 am to
quote:

You'd have to get him a step stool.


Ankles aren’t too high
Posted by SallysHuman
Lady Palmetto Bug
Member since Jan 2025
15029 posts
Posted on 8/8/25 at 11:46 am to
quote:

Put on muscle and you can eat more…it’s changed my entire diet perspective


My son bodybuilds, I should take advantage of a built in workout buddy- I know I've lost a lot of tone over the past few years and I certainly don't desire to live on 1200cal forver!

Thanks for the reply from a similar perspective- although I'd love being 5'3"... I'm not quite 5'1".

Posted by BluegrassBelle
RIP Hefty Lefty - 1981-2019
Member since Nov 2010
106295 posts
Posted on 8/8/25 at 11:51 am to
quote:


My son bodybuilds, I should take advantage of a built in workout buddy- I know I've lost a lot of tone over the past few years and I certainly don't desire to live on 1200cal forver!

Thanks for the reply from a similar perspective- although I'd love being 5'3"... I'm not quite 5'1".



My OB/GYN really emphasized at my last annual lifting now (in my 40s) as a woman before menopause hits to preserve bone density and reduce mobility issues/injury later on.
Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
39746 posts
Posted on 8/8/25 at 12:12 pm to
One of the worst lies women ever convinced themselves of in regards to health and fitness is that they will get too "buff" by lifting weights. God I wish getting legit buff was as easy as women thought it was

Long term health, you need a solid foundation of muscle. When you get older, you will thank yourself.
Posted by SallysHuman
Lady Palmetto Bug
Member since Jan 2025
15029 posts
Posted on 8/8/25 at 12:14 pm to
quote:

lifting now (in my 40s) as a woman before menopause hits to preserve bone density and reduce mobility issues/injury later on.


Good point.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram