Started By
Message

Apple Watch accuracy

Posted on 9/22/22 at 9:22 am
Posted by bad93ex
Walnut Cove
Member since Sep 2018
36070 posts
Posted on 9/22/22 at 9:22 am
I have had an Apple Watch for the past 5 years that I have mostly used to track my walks and workout sessions but I recently upgraded to the Series 7 which touts more health tracking features like blood oxygen levels. How accurate are these watches? Currently it shows that my resting energy is around 3k calories and active energy is 1.7k calories? This feels like it is a little inflated since I should be dropping considerable weight with that many calories being burned.
Posted by TigerInCbus
Raymond
Member since Feb 2018
361 posts
Posted on 9/22/22 at 9:30 am to
are you sure it's not saying that your total calorie burned isn't 3k and BMR is 1.7k?
Posted by bad93ex
Walnut Cove
Member since Sep 2018
36070 posts
Posted on 9/22/22 at 9:45 am to
quote:

are you sure it's not saying that your total calorie burned isn't 3k and BMR is 1.7k?



The description for resting energy is "estimate of the energy your body uses each day while minimally active" and active energy is "estimate of energy burned over and above your resting energy."

They're all estimates which may be the problem.
Posted by FieldEngineer
Member since Jan 2015
2980 posts
Posted on 9/22/22 at 10:19 am to
I wonder the same thing on how accurate the heart rate monitoring is. It seems really flaky if there is sweat between the sensor and wrist. Probably ok if you're completely dry and sitting still.
Posted by bamaguy17
Member since Jul 2022
1282 posts
Posted on 9/22/22 at 10:34 am to
What does everyone use? I despise wearing an apple watch while lifting.
Posted by BigPerm30
Member since Aug 2011
32030 posts
Posted on 9/22/22 at 11:11 am to
How big of a baw are you? 1.7k active seems like a lot unless you are pushing hard for multiple hours a day. I typically run 2 to 3 miles in the morning and do an hour of CrossFit in the afternoon. I push it pretty hard and I’d say I average about 850 active calories a day.
Posted by OysterPoBoy
City of St. George
Member since Jul 2013
44797 posts
Posted on 9/22/22 at 11:25 am to
quote:

1.7k active seems like a lot


That’s what I get on my 10 mile run days with my Apple Watch.
Posted by bad93ex
Walnut Cove
Member since Sep 2018
36070 posts
Posted on 9/22/22 at 11:27 am to
quote:

How big of a baw are you?


6'5" 271 lbs as of this morning
Posted by whiskey over ice
Member since Sep 2020
3758 posts
Posted on 9/22/22 at 11:35 am to
quote:

6'5"


gross
This post was edited on 9/22/22 at 11:36 am
Posted by OysterPoBoy
City of St. George
Member since Jul 2013
44797 posts
Posted on 9/22/22 at 12:27 pm to
quote:

6'5" 271 lbs as of this morning


That might do it.
Posted by Hu_Flung_Pu
Central, LA
Member since Jan 2013
22543 posts
Posted on 9/22/22 at 12:34 pm to
make sure your weight is entered correctly in the health app
Posted by bad93ex
Walnut Cove
Member since Sep 2018
36070 posts
Posted on 9/22/22 at 1:51 pm to
quote:

make sure your weight is entered correctly in the health app



I had to switch to the "Weigh-In" app since MyFitnessPal went to "you have to pay for everything" mode but it is updated almost daily.
Posted by pwejr88
Red Stick
Member since Apr 2007
37873 posts
Posted on 9/22/22 at 2:16 pm to
Heart rate monitors are more accurate but Apple Watches are accurate enough. That answer comes from me using it the last three years and also asking my doctor.

I wear my Apple Watch while lifting. It’s how I’ve had success.

On days where I work out, usually for around 60-70 minutes, I’ll burn 3,000 calories for the day and I sit at a desk all day. The workout will show 957 total calories and 809 active calories.

TDEE according to your measurements without knowing your age or job, puts you around 2,800 calories just to maintain your current body weight.
500 over or 500 under will help you achieve your goals.

Hope any of this helps
This post was edited on 9/23/22 at 6:10 am
Posted by BigPapiDoesItAgain
Amérique du Nord
Member since Nov 2009
3472 posts
Posted on 9/22/22 at 2:42 pm to
Notoriously inaccurate on some measurements, but pretty well reproducible from one measurement to the next with regard to caloric expenditure. One can find numerous articles and citations detailing this.

Heart rate measurement is generally quite accurate as is SaO2 if the watch is making good contact. VO2 max is significantly over estimated as heart rate variability can generally be as well.

Use a formula to get an idea of what BMR/RMR making sure that you give an honest assessment of the questions in the calculator, or even better yet if you have access to it get BMR/RMR and VO2 max calculated (a university physiology dept. or exercise science lab often will look for subjects to accumulate data). You can then compare to what your watch is telling you.

TLDR: fitness devices almost always overestimate calories burned, do a good job with HR and Sa02, and poor job estimating V02 max. Apple watch is notoriously one of the best of the fitness trackers/monitors.
Posted by FieldEngineer
Member since Jan 2015
2980 posts
Posted on 9/22/22 at 5:45 pm to
quote:

over estimated as heart rate variability can generally be as well


Mine says my HRV is low. Guess I’m fricked.
Posted by BigPapiDoesItAgain
Amérique du Nord
Member since Nov 2009
3472 posts
Posted on 9/22/22 at 8:05 pm to
quote:

Mine says my HRV is low. Guess I’m fricked.

Generally you want the average HRV to be higher, with regards to HRV, higher (ie, more variability)is generally better. It is a proxy for sympathetic or parasympathetic tone. To greatly over simplify, lower HRV could imply higher sympathetic tone, which in a tonic state is not a good thing.
Posted by BeachDude022
Premium Elite Platinum TD Member
Member since Dec 2006
36406 posts
Posted on 9/22/22 at 8:23 pm to
I sync my Apple Watch with the MapMyRun app and the workouts i create on there. It seems a lot more realistic with calories burned when compared to the workouts on the watch itself.

Ex: weights on the watch say i burn like 2000 calories during a 90 min workout. On the app, it’s about 900 calories.
This post was edited on 9/22/22 at 8:25 pm
Posted by bad93ex
Walnut Cove
Member since Sep 2018
36070 posts
Posted on 9/22/22 at 8:59 pm to
quote:

weights on the watch say i burn like 2000 calories


A lifting session does seem to push the calories burned through the roof but walks seem to be more reasonable.
Posted by Ice Cream Sammich
Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2010
10146 posts
Posted on 9/22/22 at 9:04 pm to
Different question, same topic.

I have one of the first iWatches, Series 1 or 2. On some of my most active days it tracks 5k steps. On days that I work from home I get 10k steps.

Are the new series better at tracking steps?

Watch is on my left hand, btw...
Posted by bad93ex
Walnut Cove
Member since Sep 2018
36070 posts
Posted on 9/22/22 at 9:16 pm to
quote:

Are the new series better at tracking steps?


Yeah, just about everything is better with the newer series watches, battery life being the main thing for me. I can put it on the charger while I take a shower and it gets almost a full charge in that 20-30 minutes.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram