Started By
Message

Have you or would you do a ball fitting ?

Posted on 8/16/23 at 2:30 pm
Posted by bopper50
Sugarland Texas
Member since Mar 2009
9814 posts
Posted on 8/16/23 at 2:30 pm
Titleist and Bridgestone believe that 70% of all amateur golfers play the wrong ball for their skill set.

So how do you pick the right ball ?

I think that most of us get lost in the mamafactuers marketing and what the Pro's play.

IMO, ultra low spin balls combined with low profile fairway woods are a oxymoron.

We all put emphasis on compression,spin, feel, durability, trajectory, pricing, etc..

My Golf Spy says that Soft is slow and Hard spins more, etc..

I still consider the old Titleist Professional to be one of the best overall balls ever made.

I can't seem to settle on a particular ball right now, so I guess doing a ball fitting might be the answer.

Thoughts ?

Posted by barbapapa
Member since Mar 2018
3701 posts
Posted on 8/16/23 at 2:33 pm to
doesn't seem like there's anything to lose from doing one - i go back and forth between titleist, srixon, and taylormade balls
Posted by mikedatyger
Orlandeaux, FL
Member since Jun 2005
4161 posts
Posted on 8/16/23 at 2:55 pm to
I think I have read the same things you have been reading: TXG, MyGolfSpy, etc. I did a Bridgestone ball fitting at the PGA show one year. I just don't notice the difference and I'm not convinced it makes much of a difference depending on your skill level and your aspirations.

I like the "feel" of a softer ball. Even though "X-balls" spin more, I don't see much difference on the green between a TP5 and a TP5x. I just don't generate that spin consistently.

I was playing the Maxfli Tour for a good while. LOVED IT. Great performance for the cost. Preferred it over the Maxfli Tour X. Dick's raised the prices and I went to the Vice Pro. I get good feel and good performance at a great price point (2 dozen for $48.99). With green fees going up and up, I have to cut costs somewhere. I think the golf ball is the logical choice for me.

My two cents.
This post was edited on 8/16/23 at 2:57 pm
Posted by MrSpock
Member since Sep 2015
4822 posts
Posted on 8/16/23 at 2:58 pm to
I play Vice Pro Plus based on price and the sound off my putter. Swing speed was also a consideration
Posted by RawDog7984
Member since Oct 2019
1942 posts
Posted on 8/16/23 at 3:01 pm to
Ball fittings are fantastic. The ping ballnamic online fitting (if you know your launch and averages) is unreal. It doesn’t just give you one ball. It gives you a ranking and you can pick the closest one based off of the feel you like and or price point. I for one notice a major difference in balls cause i create a ton of spin. If i play the Prov1x i can instantly tell the difference. Next is feel but the green side stuff if very minimal. It’s def worth the money and time to do it.
Posted by Veritas
Raleigh, NC
Member since Feb 2005
8836 posts
Posted on 8/16/23 at 4:27 pm to
quote:

Titleist and Bridgestone believe that 70% of all amateur golfers play the wrong ball for their skill set.


What are they categorizing as an amateur golfer?
Posted by notsince98
KC, MO
Member since Oct 2012
20128 posts
Posted on 8/16/23 at 4:58 pm to
quote:

Dick's raised the prices and I went to the Vice Pro.


I also ended up on Vice Pro. Feels fantastic, best distance I have had from any ball and plenty of spin.

I just ask for them as a christmas gift. I get my dad to order them on black friday. Last year i think it came to $20/dz.
Posted by Tiger1242
Member since Jul 2011
32681 posts
Posted on 8/16/23 at 5:28 pm to
I did a fitting to see what fitting most fit my game. They were in between a ball, fitting, a grip fitting, and a bag towel fitting.

In the end, I actually opted for a club brush fitting. I got fitted into a wooden handle with extra fine bristles, and a soft horse hair brush. My clubs have never been cleaner. Only $499.99
Posted by coolpapaboze
Parts Unknown
Member since Dec 2006
18362 posts
Posted on 8/16/23 at 7:40 pm to
quote:

Titleist and Bridgestone believe that 70% of all amateur golfers play the wrong ball for their skill set.
I think this is probably low. I'm always amazed at the popularity of the Pro V1. I know it's a great ball, but every hacker plays it. I'm no scientist, but I'd guess the consistency in ball striking needed to tell the difference between balls is probably beyond 90% of golfers.
This post was edited on 8/18/23 at 8:56 am
Posted by makersmark1
earth
Member since Oct 2011
18544 posts
Posted on 8/16/23 at 8:08 pm to
All I know is the covers on a premium ball create more spin.

The distance balls have less side spin.

I’m trying to sort out options that have some of both. So far I’ve liked TM Tour Response and Titleist Tour Soft.

I get a little more distance out of Callaway Supersoft, but it does not spin.
It’s a trade off.

I don’t have enough speed to game a Prov, but they are amazing short game balls.
Posted by coolpapaboze
Parts Unknown
Member since Dec 2006
18362 posts
Posted on 8/16/23 at 8:12 pm to
quote:

I was playing the Maxfli Tour for a good while. LOVED IT
This is a great ball.
Posted by Bawpaw
Member since May 2021
1352 posts
Posted on 8/16/23 at 8:29 pm to
I think we had our belt fittings done by the same guy? Martinez in BR
Posted by bopper50
Sugarland Texas
Member since Mar 2009
9814 posts
Posted on 8/16/23 at 8:49 pm to
My Golf Spy is talking up the new Maxfli Tour S.

They gave it a good score.

LINK
Posted by RichJ
The Land of the CoonAss
Member since Nov 2016
4234 posts
Posted on 8/16/23 at 8:50 pm to
My company buys Titleist Pro-V1 balls through GM, logo stamped. Guess what ball I play? My Ally Bank rep routinely has Pro-V1 balls, logo stamped that he gives out by the dozen. They were a better “fit” years ago, but still a very nice ball for free…
Posted by bopper50
Sugarland Texas
Member since Mar 2009
9814 posts
Posted on 8/16/23 at 8:53 pm to
The only thing that I miss about working.

Getting free balls, customer golf outings and playing in Pro-Am's.

Being retired is still better though.
Posted by RichJ
The Land of the CoonAss
Member since Nov 2016
4234 posts
Posted on 8/16/23 at 8:55 pm to
quote:

Being retired is still better though.


Maybe one day, I can be like you!
Posted by TigernMS12
Member since Jan 2013
5616 posts
Posted on 8/16/23 at 9:17 pm to
quote:

The distance balls have less side spin.



You realize this is simply it true. A ball can only spin on one axis. Depending on the strike the ball can spin more less on an east west axis vs north south but the spin is constant.

Excessive “side spin” is indicative of a bad strike/swing path/face angle at contact but the ball would be spinning the same rpm’s if it was exactly north south spin and going straight. At that point you still lose distance is spin isn’t optimal (either it will simply fall out of the sky for lack of spin or ballon and be short because of to much spin).

In short, balls only spin more or less. When you see a track man giving you “side spin” numbers it’s more or less a telling you the axis at which the ball is spinning; not that the ball is spinning on two separate axis’ (backspin and left/right).
Posted by Cleathecat
Houston
Member since Feb 2021
1056 posts
Posted on 8/16/23 at 10:39 pm to
Bopper,

Chad does ball fittings at Marti Golf Center.
Posted by NewOrleansBlend
Member since Mar 2008
1150 posts
Posted on 8/17/23 at 2:11 am to
I think that most people playing the newer lower spinning players distance or game improvement irons would benefit from a ball with more spin and higher trajectory to give longer carry, better stopping power and distance control. A lot of these players play the exact wrong ball, one of the low compression, low spin, low launch ones (avx, rxs, tour response, etc) when they should be playing a high compression, high launch, high spin (v1x, tp5x, maxfli tour x, zstar xv/diamond).

A ball change can change spin by 1000 rpm’s which is quite a big difference, enough to completely change how a club will play.

The main problem with a ball fitting is that what is optimal for someone’s irons may not be for the driver though, so you have to find a balance or find clubs that match up better.
Posted by makersmark1
earth
Member since Oct 2011
18544 posts
Posted on 8/17/23 at 4:35 am to
quote:

In short, balls only spin more or less


You’re right.

My bad shots usually have face open to path so reduced spin might keep it in bounds.

I do think the urethane cover is what we are paying for as far as golf ball pricing goes. It’s worth it for the most part. My swing speed is slow so I’ve been trying different options.

Yesterday, I played the Callaway Supersoft.
Hit the green but did not hold on 3 holes with irons, but green side it was decent.

Of the urethane cover balls, I want to give Srixon Q star tour a try. I like the TM Tour Response with the stripe, I like Titleist tour soft as well.

You are probably right, in general any good swing will get a better result with a better ball. Plus the premium balls seem to not scuff as easily.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram