Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Arrcos vs. Shotscope vs. Anything Else

Posted on 6/9/26 at 2:18 pm
Posted by AUjim
America
Member since Dec 2012
3835 posts
Posted on 6/9/26 at 2:18 pm
I like the idea of having real, on course shot distance data - not hitting at the range.

What I don't like about arrcos is the annual subscription.
What I don't like about Shotscope is having to carry my phone or the other little device they have, or wearing a watch (i get antsy wearing the wrong shorts or shirt that is the least bit binding)

Anyone use either of these, or something else? I was using the 18 birdies app to track distances, but again, I don't want to fiddle with my phone.
Posted by Arthur Bach
Member since Jul 2016
3309 posts
Posted on 6/9/26 at 3:15 pm to
Bushnell works great.

I can accurately laser how far the pin is.

Then I’m able to pick the perfect club to slice it and get nowhere near said pin.
Posted by Not Cooper
Member since Jun 2015
5050 posts
Posted on 6/9/26 at 8:46 pm to
Tried arccos and hated it. It’s a cool concept but it just doesn’t work. You constantly have to be looking at your phone because it will just randomly not register shots or register practice swings as shots, or if you bring 2 clubs to the green and put your putter down it’ll register that as a stroke. One day it just missed every stroke I made and registered an albatross and hole in one on back to back holes.

The yardages also never really worked. I like to hit punch shots with my 4 iron and it would always calculate those into my average distance so I’d have to go in manually and remove those. They were supposed to have improved a lot of those features but I don’t see myself ever going back to it.
Posted by JScoop8
Member since Oct 2014
1094 posts
Posted on 6/10/26 at 8:43 am to
quote:

The yardages also never really worked. I like to hit punch shots with my 4 iron and it would always calculate those into my average distance so I’d have to go in manually and remove those. They were supposed to have improved a lot of those features but I don’t see myself ever going back to it.


This is the biggest problem I have with any kind of tracking. It's going to factor in those kinds of shots, or even fat/thin shots that just don't go the distance a properly struck shot would go. While that technically would give me a "true average" of how far my shots go, that isn't helpful for trying to plan my shot while I'm playing. I'm not planning to fat/thin/chunk or whatever a shot. I want to know how far properly struck shots are going only and no one can really give you that info without a lot of extra work on the back end.
Posted by DestrehanTiger
Houston, TX by way of Louisiana
Member since Nov 2005
13640 posts
Posted on 6/10/26 at 9:05 am to
When I used to use Shotscope, they had a P-average that removed outliers like fatted shots and such. I really liked it, but I realized I was having to do too much editing after rounds to get accurate shots. I also had it in the back of my mind when I would practice swing. So, the concept seemed great to me, but eventually favored my in round enjoyment over post round enjoyment.

I believe arcos has recently come out with a system that doesn't use trackers on clubs and is supposed to be very low maintenance. I haven't used it or know anyone that has, though.
Posted by SmoothBox
Member since May 2023
2881 posts
Posted on 6/10/26 at 3:35 pm to
None of them really work great bc it tracks every shot. So knockdowns, punch outs, duffs, etc go into the avg distance to it’s all out of whack.
Posted by LSUfan4444
Member since Mar 2004
57309 posts
Posted on 6/11/26 at 5:42 am to
quote:

I like the idea of having real, on course shot distance data -


Not a fan of this. Not only does it slow down pace of play on the course the composite data isn;'t very useful unless you're adding notes to each shot, selecting what shots remain and what ones get deleted, etc.

I hit my 52 yesterday, once I hit a 3/4 it to a front pin 100' out into the wind and another, downwind to a two tier green playing 125 and I would say both shots had a carry distance difference of maybe 30 yards.

On the course, play the hole, play the course, use what you know about your distances to play different shots based on the course, conditions, game / match, etc.

I hit three 4i...one, I was running it low from the trees about 120 out and it went maybe 90 yards. Another, was from the center of the fairway and another was a punch shot on a par 5 as a layup curling it around some bunkers.
Posted by DestrehanTiger
Houston, TX by way of Louisiana
Member since Nov 2005
13640 posts
Posted on 6/11/26 at 9:01 am to
If you are going to get one of these systems, it's definitely more useful for the Strokes Gained data than distance. You can adjust it to your handicap to get an idea of how you compare. You may think you are losing shots due to putting, but the strokes gained may show that you are putting fine but your approach shots are killing you. It could help find weaknesses that you can improve.

My problem was that I didn't have time to practice. So, while I love data, I wasn't doing anything with it.
Posted by JScoop8
Member since Oct 2014
1094 posts
Posted on 6/11/26 at 9:33 am to
quote:

If you are going to get one of these systems, it's definitely more useful for the Strokes Gained data than distance.


I agree with this part. Strokes gained data is much more helpful to me. It really pointed out how much my iron play was killing me. Tee shots and putting number were always above my playing handicap, but approach was way behind. I have the tags that also show your swing data so they can be used during play or while just hitting balls for practice at the range or in a net at home. Makes it more worth the cost to me.
Posted by mikedatyger
Orlandeaux, FL
Member since Jun 2005
4452 posts
Posted on 6/11/26 at 10:36 am to
I used/use Shotscope tags and watch. I had no problem with it at all. They tweaked the website / interface and I do NOT like the changes they made.
Harder for me to find and get the data I want. I wear a watch anyway, so that is not a new feeling that disrupts my swing.
I’m not a big techie person, so I do not do big dives into the apps. :(

Another small annoyance is that they do not have an adapter for putter tags for the metal counterbalanced end caps that SuperStroke uses. Arrcos does.
Reached out to SS and they had not answer.

Chose it over Arrcos because you get same data and do not need a subscription.
If you do not like carrying your phone, wearing a watch, or clipping the Arrcos reader to your belt, I’m not sure what options you have.
Carry a portable launch monitor with you?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram