Started By
Message

re: Bloomberg - GTA VI set in Vice City. Latina protagonist. More politically sensitive.

Posted on 7/28/22 at 8:06 am to
Posted by finchmeister08
Member since Mar 2011
35838 posts
Posted on 7/28/22 at 8:06 am to
quote:

Sounds like we’re getting Catalina or her daughter from the old Vice City.


Catalina was in GTA 3. who was her daughter in Vice City?
Posted by mwlewis
JeffCo
Member since Nov 2010
21230 posts
Posted on 7/28/22 at 8:49 am to
I don't care if NPC's don't say racist shite anymore. Can I still get in a tank and frick shite up? That's all that matters to me.
Posted by miked237
Member since Sep 2019
80 posts
Posted on 7/28/22 at 9:30 am to
quote:

Catalina was in GTA 3. who was her daughter in Vice City?


Not Catalina’s daughter, based on time settings for each game, but Mercedes was an NPC in Vice City that figured into quite a few missions.

Vice City was set in 1986; 3 was set around the turn of the millennium (released in 2001). I’d say each character is around the same age, but neither character would be in this game because each era has its own continuity, but I wouldn’t be surprised to hear passing mentions of past characters, especially Tommy, whose VA passed away recently (Ray Liotta).
Posted by skrayper
21-0 Asterisk Drive
Member since Nov 2012
30969 posts
Posted on 7/28/22 at 1:03 pm to
quote:

More politically sensitive.


So do you pay for the hooker's medical bills after you beat them?
Posted by lsuconnman
Baton rouge
Member since Feb 2007
2700 posts
Posted on 7/28/22 at 1:30 pm to
No, they won’t even charge $500 to get out of the hospital after you die moving forward. The GTA verse will soon have universal healthcare.
Posted by Big4SALTbro
Member since Jun 2019
14936 posts
Posted on 7/28/22 at 6:20 pm to
Going to be the worst GTA ever. No one wants a pc GTA the ceo of rockstar should be fired on spot for approving this pile of horse shite.
Posted by TrussvilleTide
The Endless Void
Member since Sep 2021
4069 posts
Posted on 7/29/22 at 8:06 am to
quote:

Female protagonist virtue signal failed. They have had female protagonists in games going back to the 90s.



How do we know its virtue signaling and them not just putting a female protagonist in the game? Like you said, there have been female protagonists in games since the 90s. Were they virtue signaling?

I'm genuinely asking, not trying to make a statement one way or the other. I think inserting a female in WW1 combat like Battlefield 1 did was pretty clearly virtue signaling, but why can't there just be a female protagonist in a GTA game as a character decision? Did you think they were just going to have dudes as the main character forever?
Posted by DaleGribble
Bend, OR
Member since Sep 2014
6821 posts
Posted on 7/29/22 at 9:53 am to
quote:

I think inserting a female in WW1 combat like Battlefield 1 did was pretty clearly virtue signaling, but why can't there just be a female protagonist in a GTA game as a character decision?


There can be. If you want to take an isolated view of this decision, go for it. It'd probably be better to see it as one of the dots projecting where this company is heading and try to connect them.

If you want to preorder this game because you totally trust them, great. After what they let happen to the original trilogy, I have zero faith in the new leadership at Rockstar. There will be plenty of time to pick it up before GTA VII comes out, if I'm wrong.
Posted by CornDogCologne
AFUERA!
Member since Nov 2007
8726 posts
Posted on 7/29/22 at 5:50 pm to
Im far less concerned about a female protagonist than I am about their comment about “punching down”. I think you could write a storyline about a female player character and have it be true to the gta formula. Nobody bitches about Ellen Ripley in alien. Why? She was a well written character.

The usual strategy for tepid inclusive entertainment media is to put out dogshit that hits all the right intersectional themes. Don’t like it? Must be because of the female character, you misogynist.

Rockstar was put on the map for subversive clever satire. If I wanted comedy that was inclusive, I’d go watch Nanette.
This post was edited on 7/29/22 at 5:55 pm
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
50803 posts
Posted on 7/29/22 at 11:54 pm to
quote:

Female protagonist virtue signal failed. They have had female protagonists in games going back to the 90s.


I feel like females and "people of color" are extremely overrepresented now.
Posted by DaleGribble
Bend, OR
Member since Sep 2014
6821 posts
Posted on 7/29/22 at 11:54 pm to
The female protagonist is at the bottom of the list of red flags for me, as far as the future of Rockstar goes. About 20 years ago, two of my favorites were the No One Lives Forever games.

Nothing about having a female as the protagonist felt forced or groundbreaking(Tomb Raider was even old news by then). We'll see if the same can be said about GTA VI.

All I know is that the "remaster" was the last time that I'll be buying a Rockstar game before the reviews start rolling out.
Posted by JKLazurus
Member since Jun 2016
261 posts
Posted on 7/30/22 at 1:10 am to
quote:

Nothing about having a female as the protagonist felt forced or groundbreaking(Tomb Raider was even old news by then). We'll see if the same can be said about GTA VI.


C’mon Jack! The social uprising originated with Tomb Raider. Lora Croft was too fair skinned, athletic, and big busted for society, and she was downsized in every subsequent iteration.

I guarantee the next GTA heroine will follow the archetype of Lizzo…let’s see who wants to spend $70 doing that.
Posted by Josh Fenderman
Ron Don Volante's PlayPen
Member since Jul 2011
6718 posts
Posted on 7/30/22 at 11:40 am to
quote:

guarantee the next GTA heroine will follow the archetype of Lizzo

Then if you can’t lose the weight by running like with CJ in San Andreas Rockstar fricked up
Posted by DaleGribble
Bend, OR
Member since Sep 2014
6821 posts
Posted on 7/30/22 at 12:27 pm to
quote:

it wasn't their's. they were too cheap to do it.




Yeah. I just meant that they were their original cash cows and they had no problem handing them over to Grove Street Games to totally butcher.

If anyone has the resources to hire enough talented developers to remaster games and have a team dedicated to DLC for Story Mode(that could be purchased), it's Rockstar.

I'd happily pay 30-40 bucks for a full expansion for story mode every few years, as long as they wanted to keep releasing them.

ETA that I'd happily pay for something as simple as new music added(not switched out for songs currently on the soundtrack) to the radio stations every now and then. But they won't even throw story mode players that bone.
This post was edited on 7/30/22 at 12:31 pm
Posted by SEClint
New Orleans, LA/Portland, OR
Member since Nov 2006
48769 posts
Posted on 7/30/22 at 12:32 pm to
It won't be based in the 80s again
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
109179 posts
Posted on 7/30/22 at 12:42 pm to
Honestly they should have just let Tim Dillon write the script and do all the radio. Instead it’s going to be garbage. To quote a man I never thought I’d miss:

Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
109179 posts
Posted on 7/30/22 at 12:45 pm to
quote:

He knows that.

He is just trying to deflect from the fact that progressives, like himself, ruin everything.

There is nothing that has become funnier or more fun once progressivism gets involved.


Seriously, is anything left? They ruined Star Wars and now they’re going to do it with Lord of the Rings (although that is more structurally sound and can’t be destroyed in the same way Star Wars was). It’s like they have to ruin everything fun.
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
109179 posts
Posted on 7/30/22 at 12:48 pm to
quote:

And you're being a reactionary over rumors for a video game that won't even be out for two years. It's cowardly and limp-dicked to just say "progressives ruin everything". There's no thought behind it. It's just incendiary.


Oh really, what the frick have you woke cunts made right? I think I’m batting a 1,000 when predicting all the woke reboots turning up like shite. “Give it a chance, you’re overreacting.” Ummmm, no. frick you.

quote:

Plus, being offensive, by itself isn't worth worshipping, comedy-wise. I've seen and performed with plenty of people who thought being "offensive" was enough to get laughs. It's not.


Yeah because you’ve got to be held accountable and go through a Maoist struggle session if you remotely step out of line. Eat shite, you woke cunt.
This post was edited on 7/30/22 at 12:51 pm
Posted by pankReb
Defending National Champs Fan
Member since Mar 2009
64757 posts
Posted on 7/30/22 at 6:26 pm to
quote:

Developers are also being cautious not to "punch down" by making jokes about marginalized groups



It's entertaining to me that people don't see the underlying racism in saying phrases like "punch down by making jokes about marginalized groups."
Posted by pankReb
Defending National Champs Fan
Member since Mar 2009
64757 posts
Posted on 7/30/22 at 6:28 pm to
quote:


Name one thing that became more fun or funny as it became more “woke”.



What....you're telling me a female comedian thinking that just saying the word "vagina" as a punchline isn't funny?
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram