Started By
Message

Which Method Will Yield a Better Stock?

Posted on 6/15/18 at 9:07 am
Posted by Stadium Rat
Metairie
Member since Jul 2004
9533 posts
Posted on 6/15/18 at 9:07 am
Method A - Cover meat and bones with as little water as possible and simmer. Strain.

Method B - Use a lot of water to start, strain, and then reduce liquid to a volume equal to the liquid in Method A.

All other things being equal.
Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
43318 posts
Posted on 6/15/18 at 9:12 am to
I don't really do either one of those. I usually use a lot of water, simmer, and let the liquid naturally reduce to the amount I want then strain.

Posted by KosmoCramer
Member since Dec 2007
76475 posts
Posted on 6/15/18 at 9:13 am to
It all depends what method would extract more nutrients from the meat and bones.

I would think more water would do this more effectively since there would be more ability for water to flow and give the ingredients more room to breathe.
Posted by ShootingsBricks4Life
Member since May 2017
2601 posts
Posted on 6/15/18 at 9:22 am to
Am I experiencing Deja vu? I could have sword you asked this before. In method B, are you straining the bones and dumping the water out? Then putting new water in?
Posted by MountainTiger
The foot of Mt. Belzoni
Member since Dec 2008
14661 posts
Posted on 6/15/18 at 9:25 am to
I agree with Kosmo - Method B. More water will extract more flavor from the meat and bones. As the stock reduces, top up with more water to keep it as dilute as possible. Then strain and reduce down to your final volume. The reason you strain before reducing is that you're losing less flavor in the straining process.
Posted by gumbo2176
Member since May 2018
15007 posts
Posted on 6/15/18 at 9:40 am to
Been making stocks for years now and for things like meat stocks I prefer to cook them down for a long time. I'll put onion, garlic, celery, carrots, salt, pepper, green onions, parsley, bay leaves, etc. in the pot along with the chicken bones, turkey carcass, etc. let this cook down for several hours. When it is done I'll strain it and let it come to room temperature and then put it in the fridge to cool.

Once it cools, the fat will be solidified on top of the stock and I'll remove that. What is left is really not a liquid any longer, but a jelly and that is loaded with flavor. You have to carefully remove this jelly to store in freezer bags or however you store it because fine particulates will gather on the bottom of the container and you don't want to use that.

For things like crab, shrimp, fish stocks, I don't cook them any longer than an hour as I find the longer they cook the taste can get a little bitter for my liking.

For beef stocks, I'll take the bones when I can get them, season them liberally and put them in my oven to brown, then put them in the pot of water with the above mentioned vegetables and cook for several hours with the same jelling results when done and cooled. These are more like aspics that are loaded with flavor. A little goes a long way.
Posted by HungryFisherman
Houston,TX / BR, LA
Member since Nov 2013
2689 posts
Posted on 6/15/18 at 9:44 am to
Posted by hungryone
river parishes
Member since Sep 2010
11987 posts
Posted on 6/15/18 at 9:47 am to
Skip all that and just use the pressure cooker. Better flavor, less work, less time heating up the kitchen with long-simmering at this time of year.
Posted by TH03
Mogadishu
Member since Dec 2008
171035 posts
Posted on 6/15/18 at 9:53 am to
We’ve done this same thread. I believe reducing was the correct answer.
Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
43318 posts
Posted on 6/15/18 at 9:59 am to
quote:

The reason you strain before reducing is that you're losing less flavor in the straining process.




Ah ok. That makes sense.
Posted by LSUballs
RayVegas LA
Member since Feb 2008
37718 posts
Posted on 6/15/18 at 9:59 am to
Roast them bones on top of some aromatics and/or their peelings for about 45 minutes. Make a stock with that.
Posted by ShootingsBricks4Life
Member since May 2017
2601 posts
Posted on 6/15/18 at 10:13 am to
I noticed slow cooker is the way to go during these bad heat waves as well.
This post was edited on 6/15/18 at 10:52 am
Posted by Demigawd
My own little world
Member since Apr 2005
196 posts
Posted on 6/15/18 at 10:13 am to
You are doing it right my friend.
Posted by gumbo2176
Member since May 2018
15007 posts
Posted on 6/15/18 at 10:27 am to
quote:

You are doing it right my friend.


Thanks. I'm a firm believer in using stocks to cook many dishes with. You are adding instant flavor as opposed to just adding plain water to a pot. I especially like to use them in soups and stews.

Things like chicken/andouille gumbo will often find me using some shrimp stock or oyster liquor to add to the flavors, but the chicken cooking down will make it's own flavorful gravy without using any of that type stock.
Posted by TigerstuckinMS
Member since Nov 2005
33687 posts
Posted on 6/15/18 at 10:56 am to
Not only the same thread, but literally the exact same wording and spacing in the OP. The title is slightly different.

Rat, WTF are you up to?
This post was edited on 6/15/18 at 10:57 am
Posted by ShootingsBricks4Life
Member since May 2017
2601 posts
Posted on 6/15/18 at 10:57 am to
quote:

Rat, WTF are you up to?


It's a deep emotional study to see how food opinion changes on different days and seasons.
Posted by KyrieElaison
Tennessee
Member since Oct 2014
2392 posts
Posted on 6/15/18 at 11:05 am to
Make sure you roast the bones before simmering to get them brown for a stock
Posted by Stadium Rat
Metairie
Member since Jul 2004
9533 posts
Posted on 6/15/18 at 11:07 am to
I didn't remember posting it here. I thought I only posted it on Reddit.

BTW, some folks on Reddit brought up that you lose the aromatics if you cook them too long. So one person said they cook beef stock for 8 hours and poultry for 4, but they only add the aromatics in the last hour.

So use method B, but only add the aromatics late.

Also, if the bones aren't roasted, start in cold water. Starting with hot water seals up pores in the bones, so you get less collagen into the water.
This post was edited on 6/15/18 at 11:12 am
Posted by MountainTiger
The foot of Mt. Belzoni
Member since Dec 2008
14661 posts
Posted on 6/15/18 at 12:03 pm to
quote:

Also, if the bones aren't roasted, start in cold water. Starting with hot water seals up pores in the bones, so you get less collagen into the water.

I've always heard to start with cold water regardless. Never knew the reason why but that's what I do.
Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
43318 posts
Posted on 6/15/18 at 12:30 pm to
quote:

I've always heard to start with cold water regardless. Never knew the reason why but that's what I do.




Same here. Grandma said to start with cold water, so I start with cold water.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram