Started By
Message

re: Just finished my first sous vide brisket - I need some advice

Posted on 2/18/22 at 9:43 am to
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
87390 posts
Posted on 2/18/22 at 9:43 am to
quote:

How long did you sous vide?
About 24 hours.
quote:

And I’m guessing you smoked to 195 internal temp

Yes.
Posted by GynoSandberg
Bay St Louis, MS
Member since Jan 2006
74444 posts
Posted on 2/18/22 at 9:49 am to
quote:

need some advice


Chop it up and make a chili
Posted by USMCTIGER1970
BATON ROUGE
Member since Mar 2017
2371 posts
Posted on 2/18/22 at 10:14 am to
Sorry, not trying to flame but I have to ask did you understand what you were watching in the video or understand what he was trying to accomplish? He was shooting for a mid-rare brisket that would give him more of a steak like texture.

To each his own but I have zero interest in eating brisket this way. He smoked it, then cooked it sous vide for 24hrs @ 131 degrees, which for him worked out because he got what he wanted. But not for you because it appears you were looking for a more traditional texture.

Next time you need to up the water temp, or not waste ano extra 12hr of you life doing something for 24hrs that could be done in 10-12 and get the desire results yu were looking for.
Posted by BottomlandBrew
Member since Aug 2010
29887 posts
Posted on 2/19/22 at 8:36 am to
quote:

In Texas, your man card would be revoked


Who gives a frick? Traditions are boring and rules are meant to be broken. OP tried something new and is wanting to improve. I applaud that.

OP, everything I've ever seen does the sous vide first and then finishes on the smoke. I'd try and sous vide it above the stall temp and then throw on the smoke for a few hours.

If doing it your way, you need a longer bath time. Like 48-72 hours. I know the difference between 24 hour chuck and 48 hour chuck is night and day.
Posted by t00f
Not where you think I am
Member since Jul 2016
102114 posts
Posted on 2/19/22 at 8:39 am to
I would suggest OP was an expensive troll post.
Posted by skuter
P'ville
Member since Jan 2005
6262 posts
Posted on 2/19/22 at 7:38 pm to
Just doesn’t sound like brisket and sous vide belong in the same sentence
Posted by t00f
Not where you think I am
Member since Jul 2016
102114 posts
Posted on 2/19/22 at 8:56 pm to
quote:

Rohan Gravy


Posted by Chucktown_Badger
The banks of the Ashley River
Member since May 2013
37031 posts
Posted on 2/19/22 at 9:57 pm to
quote:

Preferred customers would get a better piece of meat


It does look like a bad cut. Also it's severely undercooked. Which is obvious of course.
Posted by Chucktown_Badger
The banks of the Ashley River
Member since May 2013
37031 posts
Posted on 2/19/22 at 10:12 pm to
quote:

If doing it your way, you need a longer bath time. Like 48-72 hours. I know the difference between 24 hour chuck and 48 hour chuck is night and day.


Help me understand why you'd commit to this length of cook when you can just smoke it at 250 for 12 hours and get the best results possible?
Posted by Slingin Pickle
Fancy side of the North Shore
Member since Jun 2008
3043 posts
Posted on 2/19/22 at 10:16 pm to
I’m a huge sous vide guy. Will die on that hill. I will never use it on a brisket.
Posted by BottomlandBrew
Member since Aug 2010
29887 posts
Posted on 2/19/22 at 10:50 pm to
quote:

Help me understand why you'd commit to this length of cook when you can just smoke it at 250 for 12 hours and get the best results possible?


Why not? You can cook a cut of meat many different ways. For example, pastrami isn't made in 12 hours. It takes days. So why the hate on the long sous vide time? Sous vide takes all of 10 minutes to prep, then you walk away for the rest of the cook. I thought we were over this argument a decade ago.

Look, I love a traditional smoked brisket. A lot. That doesn't mean I don't look for other ways to cook brisket.
Posted by Chucktown_Badger
The banks of the Ashley River
Member since May 2013
37031 posts
Posted on 2/19/22 at 11:43 pm to
So you're looking to invest more time for an inferior result? More power to you, I guess.
This post was edited on 2/19/22 at 11:44 pm
Posted by Rohan Gravy
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2017
20728 posts
Posted on 2/20/22 at 3:05 pm to
quote:

Look, I love a traditional smoked brisket.

A lot.

That doesn't mean I don't look for other ways to cook brisket.


I bet you’ve tried putting the seasoning on top of the crawfish after you boiled them.

Your pastrami example is a strawman argument


Some things just don’t need a drastic change in cooking methods.

Steaks, I can do on the grill or in a pan stove top and they come out perfect.

No need to sous vid or reverse sear bullshite





This post was edited on 2/20/22 at 3:14 pm
Posted by VABuckeye
NOVA
Member since Dec 2007
38283 posts
Posted on 2/20/22 at 4:37 pm to
Particularly a tough cut of beef like brisket. If it doesn't hit the magic temperature it's not a good product.
Posted by t00f
Not where you think I am
Member since Jul 2016
102114 posts
Posted on 2/20/22 at 4:54 pm to
OP can’t be stupid enough to sous vide to 140 and blow torch the thing and think it will take it to 205 and come on here and say what did I do wrong.
Posted by AbitaFan08
Boston, MA
Member since Apr 2008
27902 posts
Posted on 2/20/22 at 5:01 pm to
quote:

OP can’t be stupid enough to sous vide to 140 and blow torch the thing and think it will take it to 205 and come on here and say what did I do wrong.


The same OP that spent $40/lb on a piece of shite cut of meat he thought was “wagyu” and then came here asking posters to “rate his meat”?

Nah. He couldn’t be that stupid.
Posted by LSU fan 246
Member since Oct 2005
90567 posts
Posted on 2/20/22 at 5:50 pm to
quote:

OP can’t be stupid enough to sous vide to 140 and blow torch the thing and think it will take it to 205 and come on here and say what did I do wrong.



i mean the guy buys used underwear at garage sales on the weekends
Posted by bnb9433
Member since Jan 2015
14831 posts
Posted on 2/20/22 at 5:50 pm to
This post was edited on 2/20/22 at 5:51 pm
Posted by NWHoustonTiger
Cypress, TX
Member since Sep 2010
785 posts
Posted on 2/20/22 at 5:55 pm to
quote:

I've done a sous vide brisket before and it came out amazing... but it was about the opposite of what you did. I did sous vide first at 185 for 24+ hours and then smoked it for 4 hours to get the internal temperature up even more. You have to render a brisket and a medium temp sous vide isn't going to work.


Bradley Robinson cooked a brisket using the inverse of this technique - he smoked it to temp like he normally does, then used sous vide for the extended rest. Results looked amazing.

Chuds BBQ: Brisket w/ Sous Vide Rest
This post was edited on 2/20/22 at 8:04 pm
Posted by BottomlandBrew
Member since Aug 2010
29887 posts
Posted on 2/20/22 at 9:09 pm to
A couple things about my argument:
A) time =/= work. I don't know why this always comes up in sous vide threads.
B) How do you know it's an inferior product? Obviously OPs is, but if done right, could it be just as good or better? I don't know, but I'm always down for experimenting. I don't think we should knock people for trying something new.

quote:

Rohan Gravy


Trolling is an art. Maybe with some more practice you can catch someone on your hook. I believe in you.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram