Started By
Message

re: Baby back vs St. Louis. Which do you cast your vote for?

Posted on 5/17/18 at 7:47 am to
Posted by Marlbud
Member since Jun 2017
964 posts
Posted on 5/17/18 at 7:47 am to
SL
Posted by mmmmmbeeer
ATL
Member since Nov 2014
10189 posts
Posted on 5/17/18 at 8:31 am to
St Louis....they not only taste better to me but also retain a 'bite' after cooking. BBs become almost revoltingly tender, imo.
Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
45987 posts
Posted on 5/17/18 at 8:46 am to
quote:

St Louis....they not only taste better to me but also retain a 'bite' after cooking. BBs become almost revoltingly tender, imo.


I've never had an issue with BBs becoming mushy. That's usually more of an overcooking problem.

Ribs are the one hunk of dead animal I don't smoke to a specific temperature, but instead to texture.
Posted by Janky
Team Primo
Member since Jun 2011
35957 posts
Posted on 5/17/18 at 8:47 am to
quote:

I've never had an issue with BBs becoming mushy. That's usually more of an overcooking problem.


Bingo.
Posted by mmmmmbeeer
ATL
Member since Nov 2014
10189 posts
Posted on 5/17/18 at 8:52 am to
quote:

I've never had an issue with BBs becoming mushy. That's usually more of an overcooking problem.


Pretty tough to frick up pig parts on a smoker....get it somewhere between 195 and 205. You're right though, I should rely less on temp and more on the give in the bones.

Do you cook your BB to ~195 or have you never taken a reading?
Posted by OTIS2
NoLA
Member since Jul 2008
52556 posts
Posted on 5/17/18 at 8:53 am to
Yep. The BB's are easier to "overcook", i.e., cook to a fall-a-part texture.
Posted by fillmoregandt
OTM
Member since Nov 2009
14368 posts
Posted on 5/17/18 at 8:56 am to
St. Louis
Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
45987 posts
Posted on 5/17/18 at 9:07 am to
quote:

Do you cook your BB to ~195 or have you never taken a reading?


Never taken a reading, only by feel and pull back on the bones. That's how my dad taught me to smoke ribs, and I still do it to this day.
Posted by rbdallas
Dallas, TX
Member since Nov 2007
10346 posts
Posted on 5/17/18 at 9:18 am to
Video TURNING SPARE RIBS INTO ST LOUIS

LINK

Baby Backs vs St Louis
LINK
Posted by golfntiger32
Ohio
Member since Oct 2013
12486 posts
Posted on 5/17/18 at 9:39 am to
St Louis. Higher fat content better for low and slow.
Posted by sjmabry
Texas
Member since Aug 2013
18950 posts
Posted on 5/17/18 at 9:50 am to
St. Louis, but I prefer spare ribs over St. Louis or baby backs.
This post was edited on 5/17/18 at 10:02 am
Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
45987 posts
Posted on 5/17/18 at 10:26 am to
quote:

St Louis. Higher fat content better for low and slow.


This will be my next experiment. I normally use the 3-2-1 method for my BBs, but I'm going to try a rack of St Louis at 225 without foiling.
Posted by Saskwatch
Member since Feb 2016
18204 posts
Posted on 5/17/18 at 10:27 am to
Is it just me or has the price for a rack of ribs in the grocery store increased significantly? The price of 3 racks of ribs is more than a good size whole brisket.

My vote is St. Louis
This post was edited on 5/17/18 at 10:28 am
Posted by El Magnifico
La casa de tu mamá
Member since Jan 2014
7017 posts
Posted on 5/17/18 at 11:43 am to
St. Louis
Posted by Neauxla
New Orleans
Member since Feb 2008
34536 posts
Posted on 5/17/18 at 12:11 pm to
Spare. I don't like the St. Louis cut. leave me that knuckle on there.
Posted by Coater
Madison, MS
Member since Jun 2005
33573 posts
Posted on 5/17/18 at 12:28 pm to
i've only cooked baby backs.

just had some leftover st louis ribs from hamil's for lunch. they were fantastic. i'll be grabbing those next time i'm cooking ribs
Posted by Count Chocula
Tier 5 and proud
Member since Feb 2009
63908 posts
Posted on 5/17/18 at 12:32 pm to
Baby backs.

I don't like that tendon that runs thru the middle of 2/3rs of a rack of St Louis ribs.
Posted by GeauxTigers0107
We Coming
Member since Oct 2009
10997 posts
Posted on 5/17/18 at 12:34 pm to
Love them both. But if I go back and count my last 10 rib cooks, ~7/8 were St. Louis cut.
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
87395 posts
Posted on 5/17/18 at 1:50 pm to
I'm sitting this one out.
Posted by RedHawk
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2007
9655 posts
Posted on 5/17/18 at 2:02 pm to
quote:

I do baby-backs now and then, but they are sort of like the chicken breast of ribs. Whiter and drier meat. St Louis are more like dark meat with more flavor.


Exactly how I would describe it too.

St. Louis all day.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram