5
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
James Starks Practiced Today...
Posted on 11/3/16 at 11:18 am
Posted on 11/3/16 at 11:18 am
He was Limited but looks to be back next week. Grab him while you can
Posted on 11/3/16 at 11:21 am to Jizzamo311
Just grabbed him myself
Posted on 11/3/16 at 11:28 am to Jizzamo311
Adams stock down
Montgomery stock down
Montgomery stock down
Posted on 11/3/16 at 11:39 am to Jizzamo311
quote:
Jizzamo311
Just grabbed him
Thanks to your info
Posted on 11/3/16 at 11:45 am to Jizzamo311
Already grabbed him yesterday. But thanks for the heads up.
Posted on 11/3/16 at 11:46 am to Boomshockalocka
Jackson stock?
Posted on 11/3/16 at 11:47 am to Jizzamo311
Starks isn't good
Posted on 11/3/16 at 11:48 am to Lester Earl
This stock for Dynasty or this year?
Posted on 11/3/16 at 11:50 am to Boomshockalocka
This doesn't affect Montgomery at all
Posted on 11/3/16 at 11:50 am to Nonetheless
quote:
Starks isn't good
Name a RB on the Packers roster better.
Name a RB on the Packers they will trust more than him.
Name a RB on the Packers roster that is an actual RB.
Posted on 11/3/16 at 12:00 pm to Jizzamo311
They'll keep using Montgomery more as a pass catcher out the backfield.
Lack of depth doesn't make Starks any better.
Lack of depth doesn't make Starks any better.
Posted on 11/3/16 at 12:04 pm to Nonetheless
Kinda like they used Montgomery last week....oh wait, he's dealing with some type of Sickle Cell issue.
Lack of depth makes him a better play due to volume alone
Lack of depth makes him a better play due to volume alone
This post was edited on 11/3/16 at 12:05 pm
Posted on 11/3/16 at 12:06 pm to Jizzamo311
It was precautionary last week. If he was really that bad he wouldn't have been on the field before the game warming up
Posted on 11/3/16 at 12:08 pm to Nonetheless
quote:
Starks isn't good
it never hurts to add a RB that's due to get some volume regardless of his talent. That is the state of affairs at RB.
Posted on 11/3/16 at 12:09 pm to Byron Bojangles III
Montgomery won't be lining up in the backfield as much as he was when they had no rbs. That equates to less dump off receptions. Clear stock down.
Posted on 11/3/16 at 12:15 pm to Boomshockalocka
quote:he's still designated as a RB/WR that I can play at RB
Montgomery won't be lining up in the backfield as much as he was when they had no rbs. That equates to less dump off receptions. Clear stock down.
Posted on 11/3/16 at 12:17 pm to Byron Bojangles III
His designation may still be beneficial but his production is due for a decrease.
Posted on 11/3/16 at 1:00 pm to Jizzamo311
Montgomery practiced today
Posted on 11/3/16 at 1:01 pm to Jizzamo311
quote:
Lack of depth makes him a better play due to volume alone
this has been said every year for the last 4 years it seems.
Starks is simply not that good. Sure he might have a good game once in a while, but I expect a bunch of single digit outings for him the vast majority of the time.
Posted on 11/3/16 at 5:44 pm to Nonetheless
quote:
Starks isn't good
huh?
dude has always been capable and extremely reliable.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News